Or Sue will go mental at us for revealing it we’ll see hahaGreat spot rae-rae! I wonder if she'll change the name now...
Thank you for all you're doing, you're a superstar!This bunch of selfish bastards wind me right up! When nurses like myself are struggling for basic PPE to stay alive, these creatures are costing our NHS and benefits system a fortune!!!
I was just about to write thisOrphelia is just Orphul
There's a massive difference between having chocolate for breakfast and giving under 5s a whole Thorntons egg to chow down on. They would have been fine with 1/4 of that, broken up in a bowl, and saving the rest for later. I'm surprised nobody was sick.i thought easter was one of the two days a year you can have chocolate for breakfast...along with christmas day. i saw quite a few people on here say the same over the weekend on other threads
Because she probably wants more but if shes seen as complaining people will tell her to stop if its so toughHello! I'm kinda new here, not new to the Radfords though, have been following them for a while. I have a baby and a toddler and to be honest, two are my limit, for so many reasons, not least because of the lack of sleep. So it's completely beyond me how Sue can love the baby phase so much and once her children get to a more interesting stage (i.e. once they develop a personality and you can do fun stuff with them), she loses interest. But to each their own I suppose. I don't think having that many kids is normal and I don't like the fact she just has babies and doesn't have time for any of her other children, but if that's what she wants to do, ok well, we can't stop her. However, what's with this constant sugarcoating?? Any mum with a normal amount of kids has no problem admitting she's tired or it's hard at times, but Sue with her 22 (rhyme not intended) is always having fun and it's all great and easy and fantastic and the bakery pays for it all. I mean that's a whole other psychological issue apart from the compulsive babymaking. Why not admit you get money from other sources, why not admit you don't have time for all your kids? What's the point in painting this ideal image that no one with more than two brain cells can believe anyway? I suppose they want to make people envious, which is just weird.
maybe they have not been used to such a large portion of anything to eat for a while.There's a massive difference between having chocolate for breakfast and giving under 5s a whole Thorntons egg to chow down on. They would have been fine with 1/4 of that, broken up in a bowl, and saving the rest for later. I'm surprised nobody was sick.
Nothing wrong with chocolate for breakfast on Easter Sunday, but definitely not that much chocolate, especially in the grossly chaotic way it was done with the children all ripping into the boxes and biting into the top of the whole egg. It certainly didn't look like there was any intention to save any for later.
I think that's a given, knowing this family as we do, which to me makes it all the more worse that they give them such tiny portions normally, and then let then totally gorge on a whole large Easter egg.maybe they have not been used to such a large portion of anything to eat for a while.