Sorry to be coarse but when the pathologist says pelvic organ injuries is this referring to Preston’s pen?
Not caught up on all of today's but they are using a body map which is basically a outline in the shape of a body and then the pathologist marks all the places she found the bruises and draws them on as accurately as she can. This is the sort of image they use and mark on external injuriesI’m pretty sure they are shown photographs of the bruising visible on his body 🥲
No, they mean internal organs such as bladder and bowel, indicative of damage due to insertion of an object/pen.Sorry to be coarse but when the pathologist says pelvic organ injuries is this referring to Preston’s pen?
This will relate the to bruising to his bladder mentioned earlier. The details coming out are horrendousSorry to be coarse but when the pathologist says pelvic organ injuries is this referring to Preston’s pen?
It usually means bladder or bowel. We know he had a perforated bowel from the opening Prosecution speechSorry to be coarse but when the pathologist says pelvic organ injuries is this referring to Preston’s pen?
Ok thank you. Just terribleNo, they mean internal organs such as bladder and bowel, indicative of damage due to insertion of an object/pen.
Yeah I’m still surprised by the DNA experts but I guess stand alone, they have to say it’s not conclusive. Added with the other evidence, for me it’s as conclusive as it gets.Sorry but anyone that believes those injuries combined with the evidence that the poor baby’s DNA was all over the sex toys or the male sexual DNA from both men being all over his trousers is some kind of innocent coincidence would have to be a moron. It’s very obvious what was happening to that baby. Combined again with all the digital evidence of obvious cruelty and fetishisation of this baby. I feel confident they will both be found guilty.
He’s clearly a narcissist and he will have believed he was untouchable which would have contributed towards it.Ya know what i dont get is the level of abuse he done to him knowing hes causing seizures, bruises etc hes still under social care and likely they would question him about bruises and stuff. How did he think he was getting away with it. Why would he film him and have photos knowing the likelihood of him being caught is very high.... I mean I dont undertsand a mind like his but if I was adopting a child purely to do these things why would I film him knowing I would be caught.... I cant belive I have just wrote that but did part of him want to be caught ? Did he think he was smart enough to get away with it... would the outcome of him being arrested have been any different if he didnt film this stuff and I question if john was deleting stuff on his phone outside the hospital aswell. Pair of scumbags !