And they got away with so much for so long - no wonder they began to think they were invulnerable.Arrogance, it's surprising how many people think they're smarter than the people trained to investigate such cases.
And they got away with so much for so long - no wonder they began to think they were invulnerable.Arrogance, it's surprising how many people think they're smarter than the people trained to investigate such cases.
Poor, beautiful, trusting little boy.Jamie sounds like a nasty piece of work, his partner failed that baby too, I’d be interested in his defence as he was the one that went back to work but receiving the inappropriate photos. But also locked out of the house when his partner took Preston’s life. Did he lock him out to to horrible things? With Jamie being open about struggling to colleagues his partner should have escalated this or stepped up. This video shows the partner actually appears to be the dad whereas Jamie is distant. Poor baby, deserved better.
Curious to know what made you think they were innocent before the trial got underway? Not having a go, just curious.I did believe both of these were innocent last week
Hardly a great prospect as a parent is he?! Maybe sort your life out before you go adopting a child. Also, I may be wrong, but I seem to think it’s a regular occurrence for people to contest adoption of their kids. I’ve seen too many TikToks of “social services took my kids for no reason”. It’s beyond heartbreaking for the birth mother all the same, whatever life she’s lived. I can’t imagine how she feels knowing he was taken for his own “protection” and handed over to monsters. And her poor family as well.Just reading today's live updates from the Manchester Evening News and it seems that Preston's mother was going to contest the adoption:
View attachment 3975728
This just keeps getting worse and I didn’t think it possibly could. Poor, precious baby.This has absolutely horrified me. Wtf did they do to this poor boy.
It is horrific what Preston went through. I can't even imagine what they did to him.This has absolutely horrified me. Wtf did they do to this poor boy.
The teacher Is known in my circles.Curious to know what made you think they were innocent before the trial got underway? Not having a go, just curious.
Exam invigilator jobs are usually casual and only for a couple of hours a year so a lot of people do it for a bit of extra cash, so could be that? Not sure about his actualConfused about John's job he worked in sales right? How come some papers are saying he has a child facing role and he used to work in south shore academy as an exams invigilator?
Yes, he seems to have been a sales rep but I'm sure I'd read somewhere that he'd been employed in education, and I thought it was tutoring but it could have been as an invigilator.Confused about John's job he worked in sales right? How come some papers are saying he has a child facing role and he used to work in south shore academy as an exams invigilator?
Ah. Unfortunately, lots of us have experience of people we know (and would never suspect) being heinous sex offenders. Myself included.The teacher Is known in my circles.
It's a chilling case because on the surface the defendants look like well meaning people that are trustworthy. The witness statements of their friends and colleagues show they believed Preston to be well looked after but the parents to be over whelmed however the forensic evidence paints a completely different story - the horrors they submitted that poor baby boy to, It has nothing to be do with a sleep deprived parents suddenly snapping they are deliberate cruel acts.This has absolutely horrified me. Wtf did they do to this poor boy.
This has absolutely horrified me. Wtf did they do to this poor boy.
There from the 27 th April not yesterday. I presume it was mentioned in the opening speech and will be discussed later.The update about the swabs taken from the cot didn’t show up for me. Anyone else? I wonder if was deleted. 16:08 is the last I can see