Phoebe Court @swfeebs #2 Want a lecture? You're in the right place, brace yourself for a boob in the face

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Babies never run out of room. That is so dangerous to say. And having a big baby is no reason to induce, the NICE guidelines (which the nhs follow) state this clearly, UNLESS there is another medical complication that could put mum and baby at risk



this is incorrect. The placenta can work just as well after 42 weeks as it can before, and some studies show the risk of still birth goes down after 42 weeks.
it is very hard to find clinical evidence on the subject as pregnant mothers are never going to be put at risk just to find out.
There have been cases where Women at 37 weeks have had failing placentas. It all depends on the woman’s cycle and the actual gestation of the baby, which is very hard to figure out unless you know exactly what point you conceived
Being 42 weeks pregnant is not a medical reason to be induced



Being induced earlier than both your body and baby are ready can cause a whole host of unnecessary interventions, instrumental delivery and c sections. Which have more risks themselves than simply not inducing



whole heartedly agree with this, every woman is different and so are their cycles, just because one womans body does one thing doesn’t mean the next woman will be the same. and the nhs has the tendency to pigeonhole people into categories simply because it makes their life easier
are you a medical professional? it worries me to see threads like this where people state things as fact when they’re not. Even if you are a midwife or obstetrician you should avoid giving medical advice on gossip forums, it’s irresponsible at best.

Many people are induced for big babies, that IS a medical reason for induction in some cases. I don’t understand the scaremongering around induction, something which saves babies lives. That’s dangerous, not stating that a baby ‘ran out of room’

Evidence doesn’t show that stillbirth risk reduces after 42 weeks, every day after 42 weeks the risk increases. I have never seen a 42 week placenta that looked perfectly healthy, not one. You seem to be of the opinion that medical professionals who know a hell of a lot more than you do want to induce to cause you or your baby harm. At the end of the day it’s your choice whether to wilfully ignore medical advice but to come on here and encourage others to do the same is absolutely wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
are you a medical professional? it worries me to see threads like this where people state things as fact when they’re not. Even if you are a midwife or obstetrician you should avoid giving medical advice on gossip forums, it’s irresponsible at best.

Many people are induced for big babies, that IS a medical reason for induction in some cases. I don’t understand the scaremongering around induction, something which saves babies lives. That’s dangerous, not stating that a baby ‘ran out of room’

Evidence doesn’t show that stillbirth risk reduces after 42 weeks, every day after 42 weeks the risk increases. I have never seen a 42 week placenta that looked perfectly healthy, not one. You seem to be of the opinion that medical professionals who know a hell of a lot more than you do want to induce to cause you or your baby harm. At the end of the day it’s your choice whether to wilfully ignore medical advice but to come on here and encourage others to do the same is absolutely wrong.
Can you show me the studies that show a big baby is a reason to be induced? Or any evidence that shows still birth increases after 42 weeks? Actual clinical evidence with numerous participants over a number or trusts..

I haven’t at any point said medical professionals want to harm you by inducing you either. I have access to all the same studies and papers and policies that any trust in the nhs follows, just like anyone else.

I have in no way given anyone medical advice or told them to ignore medical advice from their providers
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
They will probably give him a really normal name, how are you going to top Vesper? you don't want two kids hating you in later life because of the names you've saddled them with🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
They will probably give him a really normal name, how are you going to top Vesper? you don't want two kids hating you in later life because of the names you've saddled them with🤣
I actually quite like Vesper but I don’t like it when she calls her Vessie 🤣
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5
I actually quite like Vesper but I don’t like it when she calls her Vessie 🤣
Same. Vesper is unusual but a nice name, Vessie is awful.
They’ll have a ridiculous name for him. Little baby Ebeneezer Von Zebedee or something. Neezie for short 😐
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 14
Maybe like Bond... to keep with the theme

Then we can have the gems of #bondlovesboobin #boobinbond #00
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 11
Can you show me the studies that show a big baby is a reason to be induced? Or any evidence that shows still birth increases after 42 weeks? Actual clinical evidence with numerous participants over a number or trusts..

I haven’t at any point said medical professionals want to harm you by inducing you either. I have access to all the same studies and papers and policies that any trust in the nhs follows, just like anyone else.

I have in no way given anyone medical advice or told them to ignore medical advice from their providers
There was a study in Sweden that had to be stopped before completion due to babies dying after the mother being left to go beyond 42 weeks. To continue it wouldve been unethical and gone against research ethics code
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
There was a study in Sweden that had to be stopped before completion due to babies dying after the mother being left to go beyond 42 weeks. To continue it wouldve been unethical and gone against research ethics code
Yes I saw that one, I have a study that shows the risk of still birth being no greater after 42 weeks than it is at 37 weeks, but I said exactly this thing in my first post, it’s hard to find much evidence due to the fact no one would put pregnant women at risk unnecessarily. I still find it strange how the nhs states term is 42 weeks yet push for an induction at 40 weeks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I don't get why people feel the need to post pics of themselves in the bath. I don't even take my phone in the bathroom. Just mad isn't it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I don't get why people feel the need to post pics of themselves in the bath. I don't even take my phone in the bathroom. Just mad isn't it.
Was just coming in to say WOW mick we don’t need to see your empty bump in the bath you nudist! P.s the baby has got her chin which is sooo cute! I’m also betting on Harley for a name 😂😂 🏍
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Good grief! Casual strolling through stories whilst making the tea and we are treated to a hand covering foof “bump” shot in the bath, what is this woman’s obsession with wanting the world to see her naked body, turn it in already.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3
I spy first boob story👀👀👀👀👀👀👀

Not even 48hours in and she’s reaching a new level of smugness
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 9
Oh of course she’s already been out, already got pics of “boobin” 🤮 of course they’ve had the perfect day.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 5
How many women is she going to make feel like tit for not being able to even walk to the kitchen without their fanny being on fire but she can go for a coffee when he’s barely a day old
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.