Unf*cking believable they tried to put it back onto the boy. And as for ….suggesting it was ONLY for 18 months….and you knew what you and the defendant were doing was wrong and went along with it!
![Face with symbols on mouth :face_with_symbols_over_mouth: 🤬](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f92c.png)
I appreciate that’s the nature of the beast when you go to court but this was a child and believe me it gets worse this is just a small excerpt.
Peter Binder, defending, put it to the alleged victim that this was an 'exaggeration'.
He also said he was 'exaggerating' over how many years there was sexual activity between them, suggesting it was only for '18 months' when he was an older teenager.
Mr Binder said: 'You knew what you and the defendant were doing was wrong, but you went along with it without any reluctance.'
The alleged victim denied this was the case and said 'all my statements are the truth'.
The alleged victim said if he didn't do what Schofield asked, he would get 'angry at me' and gave him the 'cold shoulder treatment'.
Another excerpt very much what some were saying about Phillip being with MM but this was what Tim had said to the boy.
‘Schofield then allegedly said that the reason he 'liked' the schoolboy was 'because he said that it reminded him of his youth because I was younger'.
Police IT technician Timothy Schofield (pictured right) allegedly 'emotionally blackmailed' the boy into performing sex acts while porn was projected on a wall.
www.dailymail.co.uk