I completely agree. Especially with the current hate filled climate.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
He should have been sacked after that debacle with Cameron
Not sure how relevant this is and tbh I think it’s old news but theirs an ITV party at a hotel tonight, I know someone at that party so have some inside talk.
Neither Phil or Holly are present it’s mainly runners/producers etc and a bit of a a schmooze event.
The word on the street is ITV knew about Phil being a pedalo and that’s why the whole gay speech on the sofa happened to diffuse the situation and deflect.
He somehow had managed to stay under the radar about it and convinced them it was just rumours etc up to that point.
He also has a super injunction out on the press that runs out in august, not confirmed whether ITV are helping fund it as the person there can’t ask too many questions other than what is being offered out but it’s a hot topic tonight.
If he doesn’t renew it then it’ll all come out then.
When the brother got convicted and it came out Phil was privy to that knowledge that’s when things turned at ITV and it was a matter of not if but when as they couldn’t protect him anymore.
Far too much tit was coming out and out of fear for looking like they were supporting this he had to go.
This is also when Holly started distancing herself and that’s when the rift started as she didn’t want to go down with the sinking ship, she wanted to save her own skin so she fucked him over.
I hope all this makes sense, it’s probably already known but I’ve just heard from the insiders there thought I’d share.
Neither Phil or Holly are present it’s mainly runners/producers etc and a bit of a a schmooze event.
The word on the street is ITV knew about Phil being a pedalo and that’s why the whole gay speech on the sofa happened to diffuse the situation and deflect.
He somehow had managed to stay under the radar about it and convinced them it was just rumours etc up to that point.
He also has a super injunction out on the press that runs out in august, not confirmed whether ITV are helping fund it as the person there can’t ask too many questions other than what is being offered out but it’s a hot topic tonight.
If he doesn’t renew it then it’ll all come out then.
When the brother got convicted and it came out Phil was privy to that knowledge that’s when things turned at ITV and it was a matter of not if but when as they couldn’t protect him anymore.
Far too much tit was coming out and out of fear for looking like they were supporting this he had to go.
This is also when Holly started distancing herself and that’s when the rift started as she didn’t want to go down with the sinking ship, she wanted to save her own skin so she fucked him over.
I hope all this makes sense, it’s probably already known but I’ve just heard from the insiders there thought I’d share.
‘And you’ll get a Parker pen just for applying’
Sounds plausible. Shame on ITV.
So we have to wait until August, just get on with it Philth and rip the plaster off.
Cameron dealt with it quite well, on the spot.
Schofield tried to blindside him, what on earth was he playing at
!No doubt the injunction will be renewed but with no job right now it’s a case of whether he can afford to fund it or risk it coming out.
I’m not entirely sure how much they cost.
ITV won’t be helping fund it anymore, that ship has sailed and Holly isn’t sweetness and light either apparently.
He wasn’t massively liked but pulled in the viewings so had clout
I’m not entirely sure how much they cost.
ITV won’t be helping fund it anymore, that ship has sailed and Holly isn’t sweetness and light either apparently.
He wasn’t massively liked but pulled in the viewings so had clout
His ego overtook him, aided and abetted by those at ITV.Cameron dealt with it quite well, on the spot.
Schofield tried to blindside him, what on earth was he playing at
As my mum used to say " everything comes to those who wait".
---
I wonder what his salary was roughly per year just for This morning alone?
If I understand correctly, the superinjunction is relating to PS's relationship with Matthew McGreevy. Is that correct?
If so, what's the justification for a superinjunction being issued in cases like this?
Surely you can't just buy the media's silence through an official channel like the courts? What would Schofield's lawyers be arguing for a judge to acquiesce to not only an injection but a superinjunction?
There must especially be a public interest/right to know when someone makes their living from public goodwill and has done something dubious.
And PS could be on the hook for criminal offences if their relationship was investigated [I don't know how laws re: grooming work]... so I would've thought it's especially important for the legal system to be seen to be transparent with the matter - people who commit or may have committed crimes surely can't just apply for superjunctions so their (possible) guilt never surfaces in the press?
I don't understand it. Is anyone knowledgeable in this area?
If so, what's the justification for a superinjunction being issued in cases like this?
Surely you can't just buy the media's silence through an official channel like the courts? What would Schofield's lawyers be arguing for a judge to acquiesce to not only an injection but a superinjunction?
There must especially be a public interest/right to know when someone makes their living from public goodwill and has done something dubious.
And PS could be on the hook for criminal offences if their relationship was investigated [I don't know how laws re: grooming work]... so I would've thought it's especially important for the legal system to be seen to be transparent with the matter - people who commit or may have committed crimes surely can't just apply for superjunctions so their (possible) guilt never surfaces in the press?
I don't understand it. Is anyone knowledgeable in this area?
Holy duck
According to celebrity net worth his worth 9.5 mil but I always take that site with a pinch of salt.
Yeah, it's mince. It claimed Lewis Capaldi was worth $10m and he did a YT taking the piss out of it.
I read that him and Wally both get 750,000 a year! She made a big fuss cos she wasn't getting as much as him so they jacked her salary up to match his.
Talentless pair of knobheads they were literally holding each other up because they were lacking . Will she survive without him ? Possibly as she will hang on to somebody else's popularity !
£730,000 p.a. for that, alone.
He's been on TV for FORTY years.
And a lot of adverts. And TV. And over in his homeland, New Zealand.
And the bbc.
Its a lot of money, over those decades
I studied law years ago and haven’t looked at it for years but if I remember rightly S.Injuctions are usually sort when the press have damning evidence or a story that has some clout that could potentially blow your life and career out of the water if it became common knowledge.
Usually its footballers and actors etc that have had affairs and don’t want it becoming public gossip or bribes and the such.
Superficial tit.
He would’ve had to have built a case without reasonable doubt around the fact that if this information was aired it would have a detrimental affect on his life and career which wouldn’t of been difficult considering his calibre.
As for the subject matter and whether it is legal that’s not really up for the court to decide as it would’ve been a civil case from which they are simply gagging the press and allowing the plaintiff the opportunity to sue if it’s breached.
I would assume it’s serious enough for him to be concerned enough to pay for that kind of assurance that it’ll be buried as long as he keeps paying.
Whether it’s to do with underage sex with the young lad then whomever came forward to the press with the information to start them investigating could potentially also raise it with the police aswell.
That S.injunction wouldn’t have no jurisdiction in the eyes of criminal law other than the press would have to tread carefully around announcing names and the such as they would still be at the mercy of the court and could be sued.
So he could still be charged etc but the police would need definitive proof and unless parties involved or bullet proof evidence came into their possession they couldn’t move forward on the basis that a celebrity had hushed up a potential story.
- Status