I've read that Phil has a super injunction out on the papers this is why they can't say anything about this lad. But surely if it's true phils has known this lad since he was 15 and got him all these jobs then if he did groom the lad it's a whole different story and the papers should be allowed to report on this?
Good comment. I was just about to post that none of the mainstream press is publishing MM's name or covering that angle of the story. It is obvious that there is a super injunction and the only material that is being published is what is agreed with PS and his representatives. There has been one huge cover up and damage limitation exercise here. I do feel sorry for Eamonn and Ruth who were dragged into this on Friday's show, particularly as Ruth had made a formal complaint about PS.
I don't think the public is in the least bit interested in whether PS is gay or not. It is the bigger picture which is of interest. The cover ups, the deceit, the use of injunctions, a young person being taken advantage of by a much older, wealthy famous person. Trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the viewing public. The domination of ITV's on screen staffing by one talent agency.
Television in this country has never been in such a mess - both ITV and BBC. Small wonder people are sourcing their programs from Sky, Netflix, Amazon Prime etc. ITV and BBC seem to be the natural homes for people with their noses in the trough. It's not what you know, but who you know or are sleeping with that counts.