Hmm, it looks as though people are making stuff up to fit the narrative, perhaps? If Going Live didn't start til PS was 25, then he can't have been involved with a 14yo at the studio when he was 23.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
The tweets state 'at the Going Live studios' and Wikipedia states that PS was in the 'Broom Cupboard' from 1985 which would make him 23. I don't know if they were located in the same studios or not:
I thought the same but Going Live didn't exist until PS was 25 either. Of course it could be a simple case of miss-remembering but it could also be a case of it being totally made up.
I've said this before, but I don't think we should be putting stock into what MattyLopez is saying on Twitter. If that had genuinely happened with his friend, why wasn't he raising issue with this BEFORE it all came out? Plus that text message he released wasn't PS, but he made it sound as though it was him within the context that he posted it. I do feel sorry for this guy as he's been abused himself, but by constantly lying about this and being purposely misleading, he's muddying the waters in terms of what to believe.
Going Live didn’t start until 1987 so there weren’t any Going Live studios in 1985 as it didn’t exist then. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181922/episodes?year=1987
I don't know much about this because I'm a newcomer to this thread. I've spent many years looking into this kind of thing though. There are immediately a few red flags for me though - firstly someone has screenshot some replies to this guys tweets and they read as totally fake to me. Secondly the bit about PS sleeping with a 14 year old who has killed himself - no more details given. If that had really happened to a friend your narrative of this story would be rather different. I may stand corrected and I will read some more but I think it's so important to remain level headed and objective with this stuff.
I presume they were both made at Television Centre, perhaps that he what he is referring to when he says the 'Going Live studios' rather than a show having its own studio.
I doubt people need to make up stories about PS. God knows what's gone on in his double life all these years. It had to be kept hidden.
I think everyone should look at everything they read whether on here, twitter or Facebook with their eyes wide open, there may be those with their own agendas, those who are working for others and those who want the truth and those who don't. I keep in mind everything could be manipulated, incorrect or the truth.
I wouldn't be surprised if one or two of PS's PR people are on this thread - he's paying them enough.
Three sides to every story - yours, theirs, the truth.
And everyone can have a different take on the truth.
And everyone can put their own spin on the truth.
That's why only proof will do.
Photos of Phil and Mathew sitting opposite each other having a drink do not prove grooming or under age sexual relationship.
The photo of Mathew, Phil and the young lady proves nothing either. For all we know the photographer could have told Mathew to move in a bit closer so he could get them all in shot.
We can't really draw any conclusions with those pics.
In that photo of a very young Mathew next to Simon Schofield, however, there may be something to read into that, M'lud.
Your Honour, may I suggest we look closely at where Mathew's right hand appears to be placed in that photo?
It appears, does it not, to be resting on Simon's leg.
An indication of intimacy perhaps?
Also the adoring look Mathew is giving Simon may be suggestive of affection - but we don't know that.
And an affectionate gaze doesn't mean anything sexual was going on.
Stage- school type kids adore their drama/music teachers/mentors. Doesn't mean they have a sexual thing going with them.
Facial expressions can change within a nano second and a camera taking a rapid succession of shots of the two of them sitting closely together could present a selection of very different images.
Regarding matty lopez - on his Twitter, he says he has a meeting this week with someone in Parliament.
So let's see if that's true...... And what comes of it.
I'd say that was more or less guaranteed!
Why does Holly nudge PS when she says Dan whiston 
If it was 2012 he'd have been 16 then, wouldn't he?
PS seemed more than back to his old self on This Morning today,hes convinced its all blown over..on the Dancing on Ice chat the comments about MM were gone in 2 seconds,he has a wall of defence
I still think it odd that a runner would be invited on to the stage at the NTV awards, unless he was ‘very’ close to someone very high up at TM.
So where is Mm? Does he still work at LW?
He may simply have made a mistake with PS's age at the time?
I only really saw at the end, seemed usual self but just weird when they didn’t cut to LW
Seemed v serious, Holly even looked as though ‘What?’ Could be reading too much into it tho!- Status