Part Time Working Mummy #9

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
No. Is there an email that we can see? Sorry not saying I don’t believe anyone maybe block out all that can expose.
What does she say her role is with Them?
I’ve mentioned above what her role is. A Patron, the Example given was share their Christmas campaign information.

Unsure what you mean by .. no. ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I’ve mentioned above what her role is. A Patron, the Example given was share their Christmas campaign information.
I meant what does r say her role is? I’m guessing she doesn’t admit to patron
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I meant what does r say her role is? I’m guessing she doesn’t admit to patreon.
The email is not from Rachael. The email is from the CEO of Trevi.
It LITERALLY says Rachael is a patron.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
No. Is there an email that we can see? Sorry not saying I don’t believe anyone maybe block out all that can expose.
What does she say her role is with Them?
There’s been a reply from Trevi also, to one of us. Not stating who, as it will help Rachael out

Rachael is not a Trustee, she is a Patron.
Her role is ONLY to promote the work the charity does as opposed to anything with service users.
That comes DIRECT from the CEO.


Therefore, I’d say an awful lot of what Rachael states is bollocks.

Edited to add- It was specifically asked if Rachael worked with any of the women or babies at Trevi. If Rachael was qualified like the nurses and other specialists they have on their register, or if Rachael is even qualified in safeguarding, given her recent online behaviour- which was then listed in full.
LIES⬇⬇⬇
30238
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 14
The email is not from Rachael. The email is from the CEO of Trevi.
It LITERALLY says Rachael is a patron.
Right. Okay. But for everyone to go and ask trevi about r r must mention she is involved with them. So I’m asking what r states is her involvement with them. Not what trevi has said her involvement is. If r didn’t mention she works along side them no one would of contacted them.

Thank you 😂 I was really struggling to get out what I meant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
They’ve always stated on their website that she is a patron. Did they say if they were going to change the bit where they refer to her as an online resource & support network which worryingly makes her sound a lot more capable and qualified that she actually is?


Edit: cross post - have just read the email!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
How can she say that she goes and hugs everyone then? I don’t get all this I know I sound thick but if she is writing lies like that about a charity surely they have to hold themselves accountable and stop that.
Also I know she lies but I don’t get how she’s getting away with it.
The book I get she changed names so can’t be held accountable but all of her blogging on the charities it’s so odd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Just a quick one, something serious doesn’t have to happen for a company to be taken off the register or dissolved, a company can be taken off the register for not complying with companies house ie not filing accounts. It doesn’t necessarily mean the company is dodgy
Can you remember Qwerty, I think a few threads back, I'm sure somebody shared another picture of a Go Fund me page with eleven thousand and something pounds for Rachaeles house deposit. They said there were 2 accounts going until she asked for it to be paid to paypal.

I cant think who it was 🤷🏼‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
😮😮 Oh noooooo!!!!! I hope they managed to put it all back in and you're not totally scarred for life by the ordeal???? x x
Ended up having a hysterectomy.😢 But he was my 3rd child so was so lucky to have them all. I’m not complaining! Thank you for your kindness. ❤❤X
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 6
Trevi is NOT the only place in UK to offer live in rehab for mothers and children. (Sorry I dont know how to just quote a section, I end up quoting the whole thing! ) so perhaps Racheleeeeee should research a little more before she posts. Or maybe she just LIES?!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
Has anyone else got the feeling that this is just the beginning and just the tip of a very big iceberg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 33
Can you remember Qwerty, I think a few threads back, I'm sure somebody shared another picture of a Go Fund me page with eleven thousand and something pounds for Rachaeles house deposit. They said there were 2 accounts going until she asked for it to be paid to paypal.

I cant think who it was 🤷🏼‍♀️
Yes I remeber there being more than one Goi fund me page for the house deposit. That was the point I felt she'd gone too far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
If she’s “taking a break” from helping people then she doesn’t currently (or at all IMO but that’s another issue) need to be collecting monthly donations or taking a wage. I’m afraid you don’t get maternity pay when you’re “self-employed”, Rachel. Fuckwit.
She will if she's paid national insurance. I'm self employed and o got maternity pay for all 3 of mine but wasn't allowed to work in that period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I don’t think she is having a C/section . There are many reasons she could be at the hospital , and to go from the midwife to the hospital makes me think they wanted to check babies size / position etc . Would be odd for a midwife to make an apt antenally knowing a mum had an appointment on the same day with a consultant at the hospital.

To me it just seems that she is doing a Mrs Hinch and trying to keep people in suspense about it ?

Either way I would only wish a safe labour and arrival of her baby
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
How can she say that she goes and hugs everyone then? I don’t get all this I know I sound thick but if she is writing lies like that about a charity surely they have to hold themselves accountable and stop that.
Also I know she lies but I don’t get how she’s getting away with it.
The book I get she changed names so can’t be held accountable but all of her blogging on the charities it’s so odd.
One of us has replied to Ms Shead this evening with this point tonight.

If she is “only” there for sharing information about campaigns, then why is she writing about these ‘horrific’ stories of holding babies, reading these women’s notes and crying hysterically when she’s gotten home after having such a hard day seeing these women?

Just shows she is a fantasist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 24
Hello I’m another lurker from the rant days. From day one I had reservations about her. In some ways I admired her ability to write and capture people’s attention. I found her relatable (I think I first discovered her in a post about taking the kids swimming) but much of what she said didn’t ring true and seems exaggerated. Personally on the rare occasion that I’ve commented it’s always been liked if public and completely ignored in a private message. Some really big accounts I follow always take the time to double tap and acknowledge they’ve read it even if they don’t always reply with a message. It takes nothing to double tap after reading and the people allegedly screening her messages could do that. Eventually I felt foolish for sending kind messages as they were never acknowledged and deleted the whole lot. Ive noticed her lifestyle has changed considerably and most worrying is that she appeared to brand herself on the back of DV whilst being completely unregulated and making it all about herself. The professional services calling on her help to get people into refuges was just baffling. The over sharing of her kids is another thing which could come back to bite her in later years. They may be the Alpha family right now but kids grow up and analyse their childhood and realise how used they’ve been. As for her latest post. Just utter vulgarity. I couldn’t find anything funny about it all. Sometimes less is more. On that note I’ll shut up and go back to lurking.
Where is the vulgar post. It seems to have offended a lot of people!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I dont think R took it down. @Empen asked us to report it at around 11pm last night. I have been keeping my eye on that GoFundMe and it was still up at 3pm today. R would have acted much quicker than that if she took it down.

I reckon GoFundMe took it down 😎
That’s great if they did :) I’d much prefer that than her do it
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.