So... the post that she’s shared on stories where Josh has apparently replied to a question on his account about why he features the girls more than the boys... what do we think? I get it, they’ve been removed from their mum and Josh has sole custody so that probably changes things.
But.
1. It was just a question, not “trolling”, as she called it.
2. If the boys were removed for serious reasons and that’s why they don’t feature “as much” as the girls, why do they feature AT ALL? I think people would be less likely to question it if they just weren’t featured, rather than being on Rachel’s public stories and accounts sometimes but rarely mentioned by their own Dad. If they are that at risk by being on social media, don’t film them, don’t tag them, don’t put up posts about them to 183,000 strangers, most of whom you keep calling trolls.
3. If they ARE really at risk by being mentioned by their dad on social media and that’s why he doesn’t do it, why is his account public? Why does R tag him and make it well known who he is so people follow him if it’s potentially bad for his sons?
4. This OUR boys thing could backfire. Regardless of whatever their mum has done, they are still her biological children and unless they are adopted I don’t think it is helpful to deny that.