1. She hasn’t addressed the main points just offered a lot of deflection.This site is about “gossiping” actually. Not “finding out the truth”...it’s the least noble thing on the Internet. People on this thread have turned it into a witch hunt against Rachaele at the hands of Keels and her poorly written and poorly researched article. Wake up. You all wanted her to address it and she has. But of course none of it is enough. You’re literally blinded by the hate. Earlier in the thread Keels left her insta handle and basically told Rachaele to “come at her” ...asking for someone with such a big following to do that has only exposed herself.
No one here has wished her baby dead!! Read the threads yourself before you comment.This is really not nice what you are doing to her and her family. Wishing her baby dead is going to far. She is a nice person and has done a lot for her warriors. Shame on you
I agree. Think this is well put. I don’t follow her a lot, but the couple of times I have caught her stories, the first one was Betsy drinking vodka in school, and the second was her husband half naked with Betsy on his shoulders all drinking in the early hours. Find what she shares really inappropriate to be honest. Troubling evenOh god her stories where she is crying saying she is scared of Keels. What a load of. Rachaele, I am certain lots of people much more dangerous than Keels watch your stories of your little girl in the bath or your eldest daughter in a mini skirt. You film the outside of your house, your children in their uniform, where you are, when you’re away and your children are at home, where Edie went on holiday, the list goes on. You are seriously naive and I hope that if anything you take some of the comments on your children’s privacy seriously.
It is awful that you have decided to name Keels and now her young son is receiving threats? You knew full well that naming her would send your devoted followers over to her page and the awful things they have said to her. You have over 1 million followers across social media platforms so to send them over to Keels is disgusting.
I don’t agree with everything that’s been written that is negative about you or your children. What I do care about is you haven’t done anything to reassure some of the people donating to your PayPal that the money really is going on victims of domestic abuse. Blocking those who are asking is really below the belt, most of those donating are probably hard working people who don’t have a lot of disposable income.
I think it is a good idea to have a break and reconsider how you’re going to come back from this.
So ptwm is saying seb sticks up for the disabled girl who gets bullied, but said girls mum says that seb is the one doing the bullying?Wonder if this is the same disabled child, who's mum commented last night how her daughter has been bullied for the past 2 years by Rachaeles boys? Funny how she's painting it in a different light this morning claim Seb actually defends the girl
I wonder if it's the same mother who actually commented last night how her disabled daughter has been bullied for 2 years by Rachaeles "boys"? Because unless she's referring to that comment I see no reason why she has to mention the mum or the child for that matter, from what I've seen many mothers local to her have been liking the posts about Rachaele so why does she feel the need to single one particular mum out...
Now that's interesting from the child of an anti bullying ambassador?So ptwm is saying seb sticks up for the disabled girl who gets bullied, but said girls mum says that seb is the one doing the bullying?
Got a link or screen shot of the story from the mum?Now that's interesting from the child of an anti bullying ambassador?
They've apparently been deleted after Keels received threats against her young son.... By the followers of Mrs Anti-Bullying.I would be really interested in reading the article and the letter by Samantha Marshall but I can't access them anywhere.....
Ok I agree with some points but this, I don’t. Every one on here is publicly naming Racheale, and calling her out on stuff, so is it not the same for her to do it? Feel free to give your opinions on this. I think if we can speak about her then surely she has just as much right to as we do?
Yes I came across a comment last night, where a woman local had said her disabled daughter has been bullied by "rachaeles boys" for the past 2 years, and now this morning PTWM has mentioned how Seb is confused going to school because the mum of a disabled child who he's defended for the last 2 years has been liking comments made about them... Its all too much of a coincidence. She could of said he was confused why people local to them would like posts/comments etc instead she singled out one woman in particular, no doubt making it easy to identify who she is if you live local without actually stating her name. Sly foxSo ptwm is saying seb sticks up for the disabled girl who gets bullied, but said girls mum says that seb is the one doing the bullying?
Athe letter and articles have gone. The screen shots with the names of local people are still on Instagram.It’s still there?
Because she didn’t have the money to continue to fight in court, and she said Rachaele and Josh both lied to get what they wantedWhy doesn't Samantha Marshall have custody of her children? Has that been addressed in the letter? I've always wondered this.....
1) it's not the least noble thing on the internet. What a ludicrous claim.This site is about “gossiping” actually. Not “finding out the truth”...it’s the least noble thing on the Internet. People on this thread have turned it into a witch hunt against Rachaele at the hands of Keels and her poorly written and poorly researched article. Wake up. You all wanted her to address it and she has. But of course none of it is enough. You’re literally blinded by the hate. Earlier in the thread Keels left her insta handle and basically told Rachaele to “come at her” ...asking for someone with such a big following to do that has only exposed herself.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?