Well that settles it so! Right come on lads, let’s pack our shit and head off out of here. We call give word to the divers not to bother tomorrow either. Apparently the case is now closed!The poor lass has clearly fallen into the river & her body will present itself at some point any day now. It doesn’t matter how she fell in, there are thousands of ways it could have happened exactly, we’ll never truly know.
I thought we cleared this up yesterday on the threadFollowing on from that GFM, maybe their companies house should have been paid a bit more attention to. Maybe this is what was previously mentioned in threads, where the police wait for someone to unravel themselves. Dodgy as fuck! I do hope I am wrong and hope this isn’t a serious waste of police time
Gosh that's a right slope isn't it. Who's idea was it to put/keep a bench at the top of the slope?Some pictures of the location. The bench is a lot further away from the edge of the river than I expected. ( not my pictures!)
She's hoping to be on the next I'm a Celebrity that one....I was just reading an article on The Sun website about Nicola and it literally kept quoting things that Emma White had said, as if she is some kind of oracle on the situation
I think the other blind area was an entrance route onto Garstang road( also quite far away). That’s why they were asking cyclists and drivers to report if they’d seen anything such as a parked car etc.Earlier tonight I did some Googling because I was interested in this broken CCTV camera that supposedly would have seen everything if it was working.
it was supposedly located at a caravan site, so I marked the two caravan sites with the red bits and where I thought the bench was with a yellow dot. However, someone said the bench was quite near to the road so should the yellow dot be on the bend under where the words 'wyreside caravan park' is?
I think it’s strange that the only camera not working would supposedly have caught the bench area but why would the caravan parks cctv be covering the river? Plus there’s so many trees there, would the camera have really caught the bench area?
I wonder which is the road that isn’t covered by any cctv?
sorry if anyone thinks it’s ghoulish. I thought it would also be interesting to see if an abduction was likely, as in how far away the abductor would need to take Nicola, they look decent sized fields.
View attachment 1941378
He is probably writing off some debts with his old company and starting a fresh with the new company with no debtI thought we cleared this up yesterday on the thread
With regards to Companies House/Finances - If you look on Companies House he has two active companies, the nature of the companies are similar, on the more recent one he‘s added other areas of expertise his company covers. So it’s likely he’s merging the companies together, with the strike off one being dissolved. He’s a CAD Engineer so I doubt very much he’ll be out of work.
I’ve also added below what ‘strike off‘ is, hope that helps.
And let’s not forget Nicola also works.
View attachment 1941384
But how would the abductors know Nicola would go there for a walk whilst on a web meeting? And how could they plan for being in exactly the right place at the right time to take her whilst no one else was about?I think her phone was placed on the bench and the scene set up. Not a random attack but a thought out plan.
Someone whom wouldve known about her meeting. Otherwise likely they wouldve turned the phone off and flung it in the water after seeing her on it.
We have been told very little about her situation at that moment of going missinh.
we know this much released
She works in mortgage sector and soon getting her personal mortgage sorted and had a work conference call she was on. Mic off. Camera off. Convienient. She perhaps at the moment of attack wouldve attempted to press on mic or camera or throw her phone in a frenzy etc.
Convienient for a random attacker not to take phone he wouldve saw her talking on. Fear of being heard, seen on a camera phone etc. A random wouldnt know she had a muted phone.
Grab and run or fling in river in a panic. But its too clean a crime scene to seem legit.
So Im thinking its a set scene to deflect on where she was really taken perhaps on another route entirely? It does seem it would need an aquaintance a tight plan like this.
So more than one? Two? Friends?
maybe both something to gain?
Or maybe one hired someone for this well executed crime scene?
Horrifying to think if the worse case scenarioshe has children too
I personally have never understood this either. Modern CCTV can just about get a good image when you're standing square in front of the lens let alone accross fields?Earlier tonight I did some Googling because I was interested in this broken CCTV camera that supposedly would have seen everything if it was working.
it was supposedly located at a caravan site, so I marked the two caravan sites with the red bits and where I thought the bench was with a yellow dot. However, someone said the bench was quite near to the road so should the yellow dot be on the bend under where the words 'wyreside caravan park' is?
I think it’s strange that the only camera not working would supposedly have caught the bench area but why would the caravan parks cctv be covering the river? Plus there’s so many trees there, would the camera have really caught the bench area?
I wonder which is the road that isn’t covered by any cctv?
sorry if anyone thinks it’s ghoulish. I thought it would also be interesting to see if an abduction was likely, as in how far away the abductor would need to take Nicola, they look decent sized fields.
View attachment 1941378
If the whole thing is not legit.. then you could be spot on. The phone being left literally still on call seemed strange to me. She either ran after dog and slipped…Tragic and her body will likely be found… or she left either intentionally or with someone. The latter may or may not be an abduction.I think her phone was placed on the bench and the scene set up. Not a random attack but a thought out plan.
Someone whom wouldve known about her meeting. Otherwise likely they wouldve turned the phone off and flung it in the water after seeing her on it.
We have been told very little about her situation at that moment of going missinh.
we know this much released
She works in mortgage sector and soon getting her personal mortgage sorted and had a work conference call she was on. Mic off. Camera off. Convienient. She perhaps at the moment of attack wouldve attempted to press on mic or camera or throw her phone in a frenzy etc.
Convienient for a random attacker not to take phone he wouldve saw her talking on. Fear of being heard, seen on a camera phone etc. A random wouldnt know she had a muted phone.
Grab and run or fling in river in a panic. But its too clean a crime scene to seem legit.
So Im thinking its a set scene to deflect on where she was really taken perhaps on another route entirely? It does seem it would need an aquaintance a tight plan like this.
So more than one? Two? Friends?
maybe both something to gain?
Or maybe one hired someone for this well executed crime scene?
Horrifying to think if the worse case scenarioshe has children too
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?