1 mile i think
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
That may be the case but I suppose it's something that leads us to find out what happened.
This is the road that has been closed according to Twitter. Rawcliffe Road. Yellow dot is roughly where the bench is.
Rawcliffe Rd also being mentioned. Edit: Flightpath of helicopter is available online and covers river west and downstream of the bridge, from the photo posted it looks to be the part where river is directly next to Rawcliffe road.
Im sorry but I felt from early on she is dead from prior to the date that Paul claims she went missing.
If you follow statement analysis then there is lots of what is referred to as 'embedded confessions' and 'duping delight' in all 3 of partner Paul's, friend Emma's and sister Louise's interviews.
From the get go all 3 of them left me feeling uneasy and unnerved and very wary of them.
Questions:
Was it normal for NB to leave the car parked at the school and walk from there? Cause if not that's a huge red flag that they wanted the big staged dog walk to be a well noticed thing... "oh there's Nicola walking with Willow"....
Was it normal for NB to log into work calls and stay muted??? If not this is also a red flag.
Do we know for a fact people who claimed they saw NB that morning actually spoke to her up close?
Most people are in a rush at the school drop etc and if you see the kids you'd automatically assume the woman with them is their mum (especially when it's someone who looks very much like her).
As with the dog walkers, if from a distance, you see the dog Willow, you assume the woman who looks just like her is of course her, especially when you are not in high state of recall to warrant requiring otherwise.
Likewise with the children, I'm pretty sure we don't know for a fact whether the girls have been asked specifically as to who dropped them off.
I don't believe the woman in the footage of the morning at the car is her, it doesn't look like NB it looks more like Emma.
Also, I had a thought that perhaps Eyeliner/eyelash Emma is actually wearing Heavy make up in all interviews etc, so she purposely looks different than when was posing as NB in the am.
Paul said in his interview with Dan Walker that he loaded up the car that morning. So then why is it her?
Doesn't look like her, looks more like Emma. Plus we don't get to see her face from the front.
The fact his claim doesn't match is another red flag because it feels like this was set up as a decoy/as 'evidence' of her existence that morning.
WHY didn't Paul say from the start she was high risk/vulnerable, if there was any cause for concern for her mental health etc ..I mean what?! You would be BEGGING the public to help find her and bring her home safely... So he has revealed that he was hiding the fact HE KNEW she could be at risk of feeling suicidal for example BUT DID NOT REVEAL THAT???!... it makes no sense and if anything it only highlights he hasn't been honest from the start. Therefore..What else is he hiding?
Anyone who has closely followed the McCann statement analysis videos etc will understand what I'm about to say that there are huge parallels between the interview answers from Kate and Gerry, and Paul... They are more concerned with protesting their innocence, PROVING their innocence with details of timelines and this and that...it's all about them, when in actual fact if your daughter or partner was MISSING potentially suffering in harm's way, NONE OF THAT WOULD MATTER it wouldn't even be on your mind, all that would matter would be the safety of your loved one. You would be begging and pleading to the cameras, not covering your own arse.
On the channel 5 interview with Dan Walker, Paul says of his account of that morning, "we're going to leave," ...embedded confession here because his memory of that morning would be on high alert because it's when he had just heard she is missing, if he was going to leave there would be no mistaking in his mind he was on his own and it would be, "I"... I was going to leave (on my own into a potentially horrific situation of my missing partner) absolutely no way this would be cast in any veil of doubt in his mind, it'd be accurate as duck so this is incredibly telling that he was indeed in company of someone else at this time.
Emma is friends with Dan Walker.
Interview held at house she's in a promotional video for!!! FACT! ..Which I've heard is a holiday let she owns - (unsure if this is fact) but regardless she has a connection to the property.
There are several strange interviews with Emma. In one of them she talks in detail about a ball for the dog Willow. "No NO BALL, no ball whatsoever... It's very odd. Why would she talk like this in such great detail about her friend's dog and its ball? Even if you were joined at the hip best friends you surely wouldn't know nor care to this level of detail regarding their family pet?? It makes no sense therefore It occurred to me that she is PROTESTING the lack of ball because it is precisely something she used that day to help her in her challenge of keeping that dog with her. (It's explained in great detail how the dog loves his ball so much that they stopped taking the ball in walks....) SHE wouldn't know this but PAUL would, henceforth Paul would tell Emma to take the bloody ball with her for the staged walk to ensure that poor dog stays by her side.
I'm telling you now, watch it and my reasons here will add up to make perfect sense.
In addition, Emma uses words like 'milestone' when they reach the 7 day mark... That is a word generally associated with success....she also uses the word pinnacle which again is moreso linked to a high point. She describes having planned for that milestone... Er what???! Your loved one is missing so you're planning for the milestone of a week, and not, I dunno LOOKING FOR THEM AND HOPING THEYLL STILL RETURN/be found????
Further, who is doing all the promotional printing etc for them, the big banners, the posters, "the big waving balloon man"? Who is placing the orders? Who is paying for it?
People seem so convinced it couldn't be Paul who had any involvement because he was in the house working..his alibi... From the start this has made absolutely no difference in my mind because that's all it is, a cover story. I believe he knows what's happened to NB, and him and Emma (and to some degree Louise) are all involved in the cover up, the alibi and the decoys.
The Go Fund me page!! Yes, look it up. Another huge red flag. Created very early on. Then swiftly deleted on backlash.
His tiktok, Pinterest pages... Yes not the biggest concern as some people love to point out, however with all things considered, not great. Especially the handling of it, he's made himself look more suspect.
I really hope and pray he is incriminating himself by this point.
After spending a great deal of time looking into this (I'm off work with a broken leg) I feel absolutely convinced of the likelihood that Paul and Emma are very much involved in her 'disappearance' sadly.
That poor woman and those poor girls.
The truth will come out.
Sending love and prayers to all suffering
If you follow statement analysis then there is lots of what is referred to as 'embedded confessions' and 'duping delight' in all 3 of partner Paul's, friend Emma's and sister Louise's interviews.
From the get go all 3 of them left me feeling uneasy and unnerved and very wary of them.
Questions:
Was it normal for NB to leave the car parked at the school and walk from there? Cause if not that's a huge red flag that they wanted the big staged dog walk to be a well noticed thing... "oh there's Nicola walking with Willow"....
Was it normal for NB to log into work calls and stay muted??? If not this is also a red flag.
Do we know for a fact people who claimed they saw NB that morning actually spoke to her up close?
Most people are in a rush at the school drop etc and if you see the kids you'd automatically assume the woman with them is their mum (especially when it's someone who looks very much like her).
As with the dog walkers, if from a distance, you see the dog Willow, you assume the woman who looks just like her is of course her, especially when you are not in high state of recall to warrant requiring otherwise.
Likewise with the children, I'm pretty sure we don't know for a fact whether the girls have been asked specifically as to who dropped them off.
I don't believe the woman in the footage of the morning at the car is her, it doesn't look like NB it looks more like Emma.
Also, I had a thought that perhaps Eyeliner/eyelash Emma is actually wearing Heavy make up in all interviews etc, so she purposely looks different than when was posing as NB in the am.
Paul said in his interview with Dan Walker that he loaded up the car that morning. So then why is it her?
Doesn't look like her, looks more like Emma. Plus we don't get to see her face from the front.
The fact his claim doesn't match is another red flag because it feels like this was set up as a decoy/as 'evidence' of her existence that morning.
WHY didn't Paul say from the start she was high risk/vulnerable, if there was any cause for concern for her mental health etc ..I mean what?! You would be BEGGING the public to help find her and bring her home safely... So he has revealed that he was hiding the fact HE KNEW she could be at risk of feeling suicidal for example BUT DID NOT REVEAL THAT???!... it makes no sense and if anything it only highlights he hasn't been honest from the start. Therefore..What else is he hiding?
Anyone who has closely followed the McCann statement analysis videos etc will understand what I'm about to say that there are huge parallels between the interview answers from Kate and Gerry, and Paul... They are more concerned with protesting their innocence, PROVING their innocence with details of timelines and this and that...it's all about them, when in actual fact if your daughter or partner was MISSING potentially suffering in harm's way, NONE OF THAT WOULD MATTER it wouldn't even be on your mind, all that would matter would be the safety of your loved one. You would be begging and pleading to the cameras, not covering your own arse.
On the channel 5 interview with Dan Walker, Paul says of his account of that morning, "we're going to leave," ...embedded confession here because his memory of that morning would be on high alert because it's when he had just heard she is missing, if he was going to leave there would be no mistaking in his mind he was on his own and it would be, "I"... I was going to leave (on my own into a potentially horrific situation of my missing partner) absolutely no way this would be cast in any veil of doubt in his mind, it'd be accurate as duck so this is incredibly telling that he was indeed in company of someone else at this time.
Emma is friends with Dan Walker.
Interview held at house she's in a promotional video for!!! FACT! ..Which I've heard is a holiday let she owns - (unsure if this is fact) but regardless she has a connection to the property.
There are several strange interviews with Emma. In one of them she talks in detail about a ball for the dog Willow. "No NO BALL, no ball whatsoever... It's very odd. Why would she talk like this in such great detail about her friend's dog and its ball? Even if you were joined at the hip best friends you surely wouldn't know nor care to this level of detail regarding their family pet?? It makes no sense therefore It occurred to me that she is PROTESTING the lack of ball because it is precisely something she used that day to help her in her challenge of keeping that dog with her. (It's explained in great detail how the dog loves his ball so much that they stopped taking the ball in walks....) SHE wouldn't know this but PAUL would, henceforth Paul would tell Emma to take the bloody ball with her for the staged walk to ensure that poor dog stays by her side.
I'm telling you now, watch it and my reasons here will add up to make perfect sense.
In addition, Emma uses words like 'milestone' when they reach the 7 day mark... That is a word generally associated with success....she also uses the word pinnacle which again is moreso linked to a high point. She describes having planned for that milestone... Er what???! Your loved one is missing so you're planning for the milestone of a week, and not, I dunno LOOKING FOR THEM AND HOPING THEYLL STILL RETURN/be found????
Further, who is doing all the promotional printing etc for them, the big banners, the posters, "the big waving balloon man"? Who is placing the orders? Who is paying for it?
People seem so convinced it couldn't be Paul who had any involvement because he was in the house working..his alibi... From the start this has made absolutely no difference in my mind because that's all it is, a cover story. I believe he knows what's happened to NB, and him and Emma (and to some degree Louise) are all involved in the cover up, the alibi and the decoys.
The Go Fund me page!! Yes, look it up. Another huge red flag. Created very early on. Then swiftly deleted on backlash.
His tiktok, Pinterest pages... Yes not the biggest concern as some people love to point out, however with all things considered, not great. Especially the handling of it, he's made himself look more suspect.
I really hope and pray he is incriminating himself by this point.
After spending a great deal of time looking into this (I'm off work with a broken leg) I feel absolutely convinced of the likelihood that Paul and Emma are very much involved in her 'disappearance' sadly.
That poor woman and those poor girls.
The truth will come out.
Sending love and prayers to all suffering
Last edited:
I thought that was the divers - equipment etc…
The wiki answers a lot of these questionsIm sorry but I felt from early on she is dead from prior to the date that Paul claims she went missing.
If you follow statement analysis then there is lots of what is referred to as 'embedded confessions' and 'duping delight' in all 3 of partner Paul's, friend Emma's and sister Louise's interviews.
From the get go all 3 of them left me feeling uneasy and unnerved and very wary of them.
Questions:
Was it normal for NB to leave the car parked at the school and walk from there? Cos if not that's a huge red flag that they wanted the big staged dog walk to be a well noticed thing... "oh there's Nicola walking with Willow"....
Was it normal for NB to log into work calls and stay muted??? If not this is also a red flag.
Do we know for a fact people who claimed they saw NB that morning actually spoke to her up close?
Most people are in a rush at the school drop etc and if you see the kids you'd automatically assume the woman with them is their mum (especially when it's someone who looks very much like her).
As with the dog walkers, if from a distance, you see the dog Willow, you assume the woman who looks just like hernis of course her, especially when you are not in high state of recall to warrant requiring otherwise.
Likewise with the children, I'm pretty sure we don't know for a fact whether the girls have been asked specifically as to who dropped them off.
I don't believe the woman in the footage of the morning at the car is her, it doesn't look like NB it looks more like Emma.
Also, I had a thought that perhaps Eyeliner/eyelash Emma is actually wearing Heavy make up in all interviews etc, so she purposely looks different than when was posing as NB in the am.
Paul said in his interview with Dan Walker that he loaded up the car that morning. So then why is it her?
Doesn't look like her, looks more like Emma.
The fact his claim doesn't match is another red flag because it feels like this was set up as a decoy/as 'evidence' of her existence that morning.
WHY didn't Paul say from the start she was high risk/ vulnerable, if there was any cause for concern for her mental health etc ..I mean what?! You would be BEGGING the public to help find her and bring her home safely... So he has revealed that he was hiding the fact HE KNEW she could be at risk of feeling suicidal for example BUT DID NOT REVEAL THAT???!... it makes no sense and if anything it only highlights he hasn't been honest from the start. Therefore..What else is he hiding?
Anyone who has closely followed the McCann statement analysis videos etc will understand what I'm about to say that there are huge parallels between the interview answers from Kate and Gerry, and Paul... They are more concerned with protesting their innocence, PROVING their innocence with details of timelines and this and that...it's all about them, when in actual fact if your daughter or partner was MISSING potentially suffering in harm's way, NONE OF THAT WOULD MATTER it wouldn't even be on your mind, all that would matter would be the safety of your loved one. You would be begging and pleading to the cameras, not covering your own arse.
On the channel 5 interview with Dan Walker, Paul says of his account of that morning, "we're going to leave," ...embedded confession here because his memory of that morning would be on high alert because it's when he had just heard she is missing, if he was going to leave there would be no mistaking in his mind he was on his own and it would be, "I"... I was going to leave (on my own into a potentially horrific situation of my missing partner) absolutely no way this would be cast in any veil of doubt in his mind, it'd be accurate as duck so this is incredibly telling that he was indeed in company of someone else at this time.
Emma is friends with Dan Walker.
Interview held at house she's in a promotional video for!!! FACT! ..Which I've heard is a holiday let she owns - (unsure if this is fact) but regardless she has a connection to the property.
There are several strange interviews with emma.in one of them she talks in detail about a ball for the dog Willow. "No NO BALL, no ball whatsoever... It's very odd. Why would she talk like this in such great detail about her friends dog and it's ball? Even if you were joined at the hip best friends you surely wouldn't know not care to this level of detail regarding their family pet?? It makes no sense therefore It occurred to me that she is PROTESTING the lack of ball because it is precisely someone she used that day to help her in her challenge of keeping that dog with her. (It's explained in great detail how the dog loves his ball so much that they stopped taking the ball in walks....) SHE wouldn't know this but PAUL would henceforth Paul would tell Emma to take the bloody ball with her for the staged walk to ensure that poor dog stays by her side.
I'm telling you now, watch it and my reasons here will add up to make perfect sense.
In addition, Emma uses words like 'milestone' when they reach the 7 day mark... That is a word generally associated with success....she also uses the word pinnacle which again is more so linked to a high point. She describes having planned for that milestone... Er what???! Your loved one is missing so you're planning for the milestone of a week, and not, I dunno LOOKING FOR THEM AND HOPING THEYLL STILL RETURN/be found????
Further, who is doing all the promotional printing etc for them, the big banners, the posters, "the big waving balloon man"? Who is placing the orders? Who is paying for it?
People seem so convinced it couldn't be Paul who had any involvement because he was in the house working..his alibi... From the start this has made absolutely no difference in my mind because that's all it is, a cover story. I believe he knows what's happened to NB, and him and Emma (and to some degree Louise) are all involved in the cover up, the alibi and the decoys.
The Go Fund me page!! Yes, look it up. Another huge red flag. Created very early on. Then swiftly deleted on backlash.
His tiktok, Pinterest pages... Yes not the biggest concern as some people love to point out, however with all things considered, not great. Especially the handling of it, he's made himself look more suspect.
I really hope and pray he is incriminating himself by this point.
After spending a great deal of time looking into this (I'm off work with a broken leg) I feel absolutely convinced of the likelihood that Paul and Emma are very much involved in her 'disappearance' sadly.
That poor woman and those poor girls.
The truth will come out.
Sending love and prayers to all suffering
Maps is saying its Hall Lane that's shut. The red dot is where the bench is
I’m so baffled, that’s so close to where she went missing? Surely that area has been searched countless amount of times?
This, I'm in a relationship with my oh and we have been for 17 years. My parents know very little of our relationship. They don't know what happens in our house, in fact I'll be honest, I haven't seen my mum or dad in person since just before Christmas. They live less than a 5 minute drive from me, they don't see our kids, they know nothing of our life other than what they see on FB. And maybe a bi weekly phonecall from my mum.
I don't actually know what I'm trying to say but I just wanted to say it. Parents don't know people's relationships especially if they aren't keen
There's literally a photo on twitter saying "walkers finding the body"
Ghouls the lot of them, it sickens me to my stomach. Its a woman who posted it too, has she no thoughts for another woman other than 'twitter fame'
Ghouls the lot of them, it sickens me to my stomach. Its a woman who posted it too, has she no thoughts for another woman other than 'twitter fame'
Water moves though
Police helicopter flight path from Twitter -
Why do people have to post stuff like that? It's so thoughtless to her poor parents and those little girls and the rest of the family!
Quite often bodies are found not far from where the person went missing in the water. Searches aren't 100% accurate.
I really hope they've found her to give her family some answers at last.
I feel really sad because I feel like this is it. Something has clearly been found. In one way, I hope it is her so her family have closure but I was hoping she'd just run off I don't want to look at the news but I know I will.
I don't want to look at the news but I know I will.
You need to read the wiki for a lot of answers to the red flags you raiseIm sorry but I felt from early on she is dead from prior to the date that Paul claims she went missing.
If you follow statement analysis then there is lots of what is referred to as 'embedded confessions' and 'duping delight' in all 3 of partner Paul's, friend Emma's and sister Louise's interviews.
From the get go all 3 of them left me feeling uneasy and unnerved and very wary of them.
Questions:
Was it normal for NB to leave the car parked at the school and walk from there? Cos if not that's a huge red flag that they wanted the big staged dog walk to be a well noticed thing... "oh there's Nicola walking with Willow"....
Was it normal for NB to log into work calls and stay muted??? If not this is also a red flag.
Do we know for a fact people who claimed they saw NB that morning actually spoke to her up close?
Most people are in a rush at the school drop etc and if you see the kids you'd automatically assume the woman with them is their mum (especially when it's someone who looks very much like her).
As with the dog walkers, if from a distance, you see the dog Willow, you assume the woman who looks just like hernis of course her, especially when you are not in high state of recall to warrant requiring otherwise.
Likewise with the children, I'm pretty sure we don't know for a fact whether the girls have been asked specifically as to who dropped them off.
I don't believe the woman in the footage of the morning at the car is her, it doesn't look like NB it looks more like Emma.
Also, I had a thought that perhaps Eyeliner/eyelash Emma is actually wearing Heavy make up in all interviews etc, so she purposely looks different than when was posing as NB in the am.
Paul said in his interview with Dan Walker that he loaded up the car that morning. So then why is it her?
Doesn't look like her, looks more like Emma.
The fact his claim doesn't match is another red flag because it feels like this was set up as a decoy/as 'evidence' of her existence that morning.
WHY didn't Paul say from the start she was high risk/ vulnerable, if there was any cause for concern for her mental health etc ..I mean what?! You would be BEGGING the public to help find her and bring her home safely... So he has revealed that he was hiding the fact HE KNEW she could be at risk of feeling suicidal for example BUT DID NOT REVEAL THAT???!... it makes no sense and if anything it only highlights he hasn't been honest from the start. Therefore..What else is he hiding?
Anyone who has closely followed the McCann statement analysis videos etc will understand what I'm about to say that there are huge parallels between the interview answers from Kate and Gerry, and Paul... They are more concerned with protesting their innocence, PROVING their innocence with details of timelines and this and that...it's all about them, when in actual fact if your daughter or partner was MISSING potentially suffering in harm's way, NONE OF THAT WOULD MATTER it wouldn't even be on your mind, all that would matter would be the safety of your loved one. You would be begging and pleading to the cameras, not covering your own arse.
On the channel 5 interview with Dan Walker, Paul says of his account of that morning, "we're going to leave," ...embedded confession here because his memory of that morning would be on high alert because it's when he had just heard she is missing, if he was going to leave there would be no mistaking in his mind he was on his own and it would be, "I"... I was going to leave (on my own into a potentially horrific situation of my missing partner) absolutely no way this would be cast in any veil of doubt in his mind, it'd be accurate as duck so this is incredibly telling that he was indeed in company of someone else at this time.
Emma is friends with Dan Walker.
Interview held at house she's in a promotional video for!!! FACT! ..Which I've heard is a holiday let she owns - (unsure if this is fact) but regardless she has a connection to the property.
There are several strange interviews with emma.in one of them she talks in detail about a ball for the dog Willow. "No NO BALL, no ball whatsoever... It's very odd. Why would she talk like this in such great detail about her friends dog and it's ball? Even if you were joined at the hip best friends you surely wouldn't know not care to this level of detail regarding their family pet?? It makes no sense therefore It occurred to me that she is PROTESTING the lack of ball because it is precisely someone she used that day to help her in her challenge of keeping that dog with her. (It's explained in great detail how the dog loves his ball so much that they stopped taking the ball in walks....) SHE wouldn't know this but PAUL would henceforth Paul would tell Emma to take the bloody ball with her for the staged walk to ensure that poor dog stays by her side.
I'm telling you now, watch it and my reasons here will add up to make perfect sense.
In addition, Emma uses words like 'milestone' when they reach the 7 day mark... That is a word generally associated with success....she also uses the word pinnacle which again is more so linked to a high point. She describes having planned for that milestone... Er what???! Your loved one is missing so you're planning for the milestone of a week, and not, I dunno LOOKING FOR THEM AND HOPING THEYLL STILL RETURN/be found????
Further, who is doing all the promotional printing etc for them, the big banners, the posters, "the big waving balloon man"? Who is placing the orders? Who is paying for it?
People seem so convinced it couldn't be Paul who had any involvement because he was in the house working..his alibi... From the start this has made absolutely no difference in my mind because that's all it is, a cover story. I believe he knows what's happened to NB, and him and Emma (and to some degree Louise) are all involved in the cover up, the alibi and the decoys.
The Go Fund me page!! Yes, look it up. Another huge red flag. Created very early on. Then swiftly deleted on backlash.
His tiktok, Pinterest pages... Yes not the biggest concern as some people love to point out, however with all things considered, not great. Especially the handling of it, he's made himself look more suspect.
I really hope and pray he is incriminating himself by this point.
After spending a great deal of time looking into this (I'm off work with a broken leg) I feel absolutely convinced of the likelihood that Paul and Emma are very much involved in her 'disappearance' sadly.
That poor woman and those poor girls.
The truth will come out.
Sending love and prayers to all suffering
I can't decide with Emma, does she just mean well and is an interfering busy body friend or is she a fame hungry NB wannabe
- Status