But this is what the Police are wanting thr public to believe: drunk women falls in river. Case closed. Even if she wasn't drunk that morning, the Police want to fuel their theory (even if it's wrong) because they royally fucked up.I think questioning whether she was drunk driving and with her kids is pretty insulting tbh. Yes she may have had alcohol problems but it doesn’t mean she was drunk 100% of the time. I think this update is incredibly sad and I take my hat off to Paul and her friends for protecting her for so long. For those questioning why it was released… how is this a huge surprise given the amount of scrutiny and stalking they’ve all received. They’ve probably been advised to release these details at this stage.
My heart goes out to Nicola and it makes me really sad thinking of what she was going through on that morning.
Yeah, that was my understanding that it was to protect him rather than the other way around.I’m confused as to why it’s thought that the welfare check was to do with something Paul had done? It seems more like it was to do with the alcohol issues and the fact there are children in the home? Sorry if I’ve missed something.
I completely understand Paul and the family withholding this information.
In fact the statement seems like the police have issued it in response to the criticisms they’ve been facing; sort of “this is why we think she’s in the river - it’s based on what we’ve been told”
I hope those little girls are offered some professional help at some point to deal with all this
The police probably got the heads up the press were in receipt of the information and were about to release it.Lancashire police has gone way down in my respect for them by doing this. There was no need to release this information to the media and public and it smells to me like the police trying to shift some of the negative attention away from themselves by throwing out a bone for everyone to discuss. Poor Nicola, imagine having your personal life discussed over by window lickers.
Highly doubt she drunk drove the car to school at 8.40am or Paul would have let her drunk drive with the kids and she spoke to people at the school someone would have smelt/noticed if she was drunkSpeaking of facts I'd like to see a direct link to any suggestion or evidence that Nicole was driving drunk with her kids in the car.
Interested to know why?I can't with the sleeveless top!!
There's absolutely no evidence she's ever driven over the limit, nevermind with the children in the car.I never called her a bad parent.
You are aware aren't you that if you're in therapy or under a mental health service and they're made aware you drink excessively and drive they WILL report you to children's services (it's a safeguarding concern) AND report you to the DVLA. If you say you drink till 2am for example and then do the school run, you could still be pissed and your clinician had a duty of care to report this.
These are facts, not my opinion.
I stand by my original comment. Drinking and driving with your kids in your car IS inexcusable and illegal!
Paul had a DUTY OF CARE to stop her.
That bruise was on his face forever … I’d say it’s a birthmarkWondering about the other incident where the police were called and then the bruise on Paul’s face?
And why the tone of the appeals was about the girls needing their mummy.To me it sounds like she’s maybe gone off before when it’s got too much and this is why Paul out “come home now” on the ribbon, and why he’s adamant she’s not in the water. I just hope she is found safe and well and gets the help she needs
That’s true but she may have still been over the limit if she had a drink or a few from the night before? The longer this case seems to go on the more confusing it becomesSo just maybe that while alcohol was obviously an issue in her life, she hadn’t actually drunk any that morning.
Depends whether a voluntary section or not or what kind of section it is. My son was voluntarily sectioned and was allowed to just leave the facility when he said he wanted to go home (he had been in 12 days at this point).Possibly. Or she was in a rehab facility for her alcohol problems. My colleague said she’d heard on good authority that Nicola had been in a psychiatric hospital and discharged herself. But that good be crossed wires. You can’t discharge yourself if you’ve been sectioned I don’t think?
Yes I felt that there was a heavy emphasis on the girls but not PaulAnd why the tone of the appeals was about the girls needing their mummy.
They never said that she was drunk. This is something people have just come up with based on the releaseBut this is what the Police are wanting thr public to believe: drunk women falls in river. Case closed. Even if she wasn't drunk that morning, the Police want to fuel their theory (even if it's wrong) because they royally fucked up.
This is their opportunity to excuse their lack of competence in this case.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?