Thanks @knickerbockerey
Had a brief listen but couldn’t handle too much!
Are they giving you paid members everything they’re promising, or are they still not really bothering?
Nadia Sawalha #44 Youngest back to school, Nads the fool, M talks rimmin, content dimming!
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Had a brief listen but couldn’t handle too much!
Are they giving you paid members everything they’re promising, or are they still not really bothering?
Great friend she is
They were on their way back from “a friend’s“ on the members live 
and she apparently couldn’t even stay awake to watch Judi on Strictly tonight but also didn’t even know it was the launch show and not live either!
Done at 23:10
I couldn't find it on youtube, where is it? 
Thanks knickerbockerey
Check out the paltry viewing figures screenshot long after the long-awaited Members Live. It looks like some of the others have acted on Mark Adderley's advice for their members who don't like being d*cked about. They've clearly switched off their notification bells!
And only 73
s When Nadia Sawalha opens her eyes she'll be raging but it's 73 more than the lazy feckers deserve.I wonder how many paying members suffered what looks like their half-hour car journey home in the dark all the way through?
At least they'll have barely any badges to buy, even if they took my advice and posted them tomorrow. #SparkofJoy
I think when they thought up putting their family on YouTube they thought they were going to strike it rich
You know like the Osbornes…..
You know like the Osbornes…..
Painful
when they could’ve gone down the shops and bought themselves a nice punnet of strawberries or a chocolate bar instead. Money well spent aye Sooo jealous of Judi Love, and how disrespectful to say that about your so called ‘friend’ and colleague. Imagine if that somehow got back to Judi.Great friend she is
Wonder if she fell asleep during Celeb Gogglebox with Judi Love and Charlene White appearing on it?
Last edited:
so if they have around 200 paid members they are pulling in £400 plus from income
YT take about 40% - then tax etc is it really worth it
The views wont generate a lot of revenue from ads
no wonder they are pushing the channel so much - they are getting desperate
YT take about 40% - then tax etc is it really worth it
The views wont generate a lot of revenue from ads
no wonder they are pushing the channel so much - they are getting desperate
I just listened to what he was saying about Kaye sleeping in the nude. How excited was he, he looked like he almost wanted something to be going on with Kaye and the nitwitch, what a filthy grubby dirty little mind he has he probably trotted off to his toy room to have a play with his cocktail sausage. Worse still she seemed happy with him thinking that, the fake laugh. I'll never know why Kaye hangs out with her, she's far more intelligent and seems to have a lot more about her but I do think she can't stand manky she never goes anywhere near him since they had that run-in about him threatening suicide.
Yes, I really believe there are two main reasons for keeping it going and the first is she is keeping Manks in employment. She can walk around saying he’s in charge, films, directs, EDITS and in between he is writing his ‘films.’ ‘He’s sooo busy, busy busy.’ I’m sure when they first met she was probably duped by him that he was going to be a big hotshot director, and he was duped by her that she was going to override Julia’s fame and become a Hollywood star.
Children arrived, rehab beckoned, the rot set in..
Neither of them can admit defeat, admit they are toxic for each other. They say if you can swim and someone next to you is drowning don’t let them hold on to you because they will push you down in order to stay afloat, they are both clamboring on top of each other gasping for air, and drowning.
Second, the tax deductible thing, it’s a dirty trick but not uncommon and all helps towards the primary intention, ‘Keep husband employed.’
Then, an added bonus for her, she gets to play around in front of a camera 24/7 and pretend to be whatever she wants. Like a child who dresses up as a Princess one day, plays Nurse the next etc.. Baby Jane syndrome.
I think initially when they started with Kaye the channel had legs and was running ( I wasn’t watching then) but I have seen the decline over the past year, yet because of their egos they have to pretend to themselves it is a great success.
She must lie her hind legs off at LW and the sad thing is she thinks they all believe her.
It’s all smoke and mirrors, except the only people who are fooled, are themselves.
She’s just a massive prick tease, and he’s an overgrown kid who’s clinging on to teenage fantasies that are never going to play out.
Nadia is no more into Kaye than she is Mark
I am a bit annoyed by Nadia and Mark’s attitude towards dangers of men towards women. We have Nadia acting like every man is a possible rapist, and then we have Mark actively praising their daughter for dressing like a slut and drinking late at night in public parks.
Of course, any man who attacks a woman is in the wrong, and in an ideal world women would be safe to walk anywhere at any time in any state of drunkenness alone. But the reality is that no matter how much men are educated to respect women, there are always going to be a small minority who will pick out women in vulnerable situations to attack. Same as there will always be people who like watching porn involving children. These people have something go wrong in their brains and unfortunately decide to act on their impulses. No matter how well the police work on prevention, no matter how much schools try to educate, you can’t totally eradicate predators. Having protest marches about women’s safety makes no difference, the best outcome of protesting that can be hoped for is preventative changes such as better streetlighting.
What you can do however, is not position yourself in a situation where you make yourself an easy target for an attacker. Some people will find that difficult due to having to walk to and from work in areas that do not feel safe. The SA family are not in that situation, so if according to Nadia ‘every’ man is a danger, then why have they not had any issue with their daughter dressing in a way that is likely to attract unwanted attention, getting drink in a public place that isn’t well lit and likely isn’t covered by security cameras, and possibly also have to walk just with a small number of other girls or even alone late at night in a highly populated part of London. It’s a complete contradiction, we will never be in that ideal world where no man is a danger to women, but women can do small things to try to prevent them being easy targets.
I was taught as a teen to drink only at home or at venues such as pubs, and to always get a taxi to the door, and not to wait outside a pub for the taxi unless I had friends with me. We also did wear slightly revealing clothing, but this was something our parents didn’t really like and pushed us back on a little, due to wanting to ensure we did not attract the wrong kind of attention.
When Maddie is drinking in the park with her tits barely covered and her tights ripped to shreds, even when the group have their sappy looking boys present, that doesn’t make them safe from any weirdos that decide to prowl the park during darkness. The way Maddie dresses to go to the park makes her look like she is from an impoverished background, she doesn’t look like the type whose looks will be angelic enough to be on the front pages of a newspaper should she be attacked and attract a lot of publicity, she looks like the type that may not even be believed if she were to report an attack (not saying that she wouldn’t be, just that to an attacker looking for an unreliable ’witness’ who may be drunk or on drugs, possibly with a minor criminal record so a history of lying to the police, her appearance gives off those vibes…an attacker doesn’t know she is the daughter of a ‘celebrity’ and lives in a £1m home)..those things make her a target because an attacker will feel more likely to get away with it if attacking someone who won’t garner mass public sympathy via front page news.
Of course, any man who attacks a woman is in the wrong, and in an ideal world women would be safe to walk anywhere at any time in any state of drunkenness alone. But the reality is that no matter how much men are educated to respect women, there are always going to be a small minority who will pick out women in vulnerable situations to attack. Same as there will always be people who like watching porn involving children. These people have something go wrong in their brains and unfortunately decide to act on their impulses. No matter how well the police work on prevention, no matter how much schools try to educate, you can’t totally eradicate predators. Having protest marches about women’s safety makes no difference, the best outcome of protesting that can be hoped for is preventative changes such as better streetlighting.
What you can do however, is not position yourself in a situation where you make yourself an easy target for an attacker. Some people will find that difficult due to having to walk to and from work in areas that do not feel safe. The SA family are not in that situation, so if according to Nadia ‘every’ man is a danger, then why have they not had any issue with their daughter dressing in a way that is likely to attract unwanted attention, getting drink in a public place that isn’t well lit and likely isn’t covered by security cameras, and possibly also have to walk just with a small number of other girls or even alone late at night in a highly populated part of London. It’s a complete contradiction, we will never be in that ideal world where no man is a danger to women, but women can do small things to try to prevent them being easy targets.
I was taught as a teen to drink only at home or at venues such as pubs, and to always get a taxi to the door, and not to wait outside a pub for the taxi unless I had friends with me. We also did wear slightly revealing clothing, but this was something our parents didn’t really like and pushed us back on a little, due to wanting to ensure we did not attract the wrong kind of attention.
When Maddie is drinking in the park with her tits barely covered and her tights ripped to shreds, even when the group have their sappy looking boys present, that doesn’t make them safe from any weirdos that decide to prowl the park during darkness. The way Maddie dresses to go to the park makes her look like she is from an impoverished background, she doesn’t look like the type whose looks will be angelic enough to be on the front pages of a newspaper should she be attacked and attract a lot of publicity, she looks like the type that may not even be believed if she were to report an attack (not saying that she wouldn’t be, just that to an attacker looking for an unreliable ’witness’ who may be drunk or on drugs, possibly with a minor criminal record so a history of lying to the police, her appearance gives off those vibes…an attacker doesn’t know she is the daughter of a ‘celebrity’ and lives in a £1m home)..those things make her a target because an attacker will feel more likely to get away with it if attacking someone who won’t garner mass public sympathy via front page news.
Well said @Eye_Spy you've articulated what's been at the back of my mind (and probably many others) for a while now.
When I said for example that it almost feels like Mark has groomed his daughter by teaching her that it's a good thing to have a highly sexualised image and then (worst of all) giving her the impression that she can do whatever she likes because there will be no consequences?
It's a very troubling mixed message he sends out (and Nadia too but I get the impression that Maddie looks up to Mark far more than the mother) because ok that's permissable under their roof (not that it should be) but what about the outside world?
She may be daddy's little girl and put on a pedestal but to others she may well come across as spoilt and entitled and they aren't going to necessarily hang off her every word or sing her praises it may very well be the opposite!
In other words (as you so eloquently stated) she might very well attract attention for all the wrong reasons and (this is the thing for me) because she isn't used to dealing with being challenged or not worshipped or with criticism or dealing in a confident assertive manner with negativity how will she respond?
She hasn't been taught resilience she has been brought up to think life can be both easy and will go your way if you pout or stamp your foot!
I think it's for those reasons she might attract negativity from people (just like the parents both antagonise people) and that's another thing she is taught any attention is good attention (even negative) so it's hardly helpful for her is it? (Huge understatement)
Be provocative (in dress and style) do what you like drink take drugs (whatever) anything goes. anything is permissable and permitted!
You don't have to be a genius to work out how a predatory person could take that? (See it as an invitation).
Excuse my language but they are bleeping crappy parents and Maddie (unfairly for her) gets to bask in their own immorality!
That's what narcissistic parents do they programme their kids to be like them but at the same time they plant within just enough of a seed of self sabotage so that you'll never be a threat! (But others might be a threat to you though!).
Coffee Moaning for Sunday. All I have to say is, let's hope they have a tight schedule today so we don't have the almost 1 hour opus of Saturday. My poor fingies are tired. Title is "Julia Bradbury, CO2 Crisis, Looting in London, Keeping Pets Alive, Nostalgic Dishes, Low Traffic Neighbourhoods.""A minute ago you would have seen what a shithole the kitchen is." Umm, thanks Nads. What a way to start the live.
Mark says it had to do with filming, but Nads says it doesn't "it has to do with US!" Mark:"It's YOU!" "Oh my God, so nobody eats in this house?" Mark says he would help if he wasn't EDITING today. 
"Otherwise you wouldn't get the Sunday Show." Nads asks what has that got to do with anything and then proceeds to fluff and scratch her lid. Mark asks Nads to explain the broom situation in the member's live yesterday and Nadia says you had to have been there. Nadia is worry about her brain again, thinking she was in a different dimension. "I haven't been able to speak properly all moring and I am really worried about it. Scratch, scratch. Roll call. Carly is having sausage and mash. "Now I want sausage and mash."
Welcome Jamie E. This welcome is taking forever. Nadia is trying to change her laugh. Something about getting oxygen in to prevent snorts. Mark coughing and they are still welcoming Jamie. Sam has had pie and mash. Stew is on for the Sunday Show-stew cobbler marmite and cheese. 
Zoe loves Nadia's laugh. Talk about Nadia's laugh and Mark being an arse, clicking that damn pen of his. Nadia talks about being grateful. Mark is slurping his espresso and his middle finger has great prominence as he tips his cup. Nadia talks about her 3 friends Titty Gritty, Hannah and Dance Yer Tits Off, which leads to cancer diagnosis-the First Dates barman and Julia Bradbury. Slurp, slurp from Mark. Did you know Mark worked with Julia Bradbury on Channel 5? Nadia talks about an article about an breast oncologist, lived a healthy life, ended up with breast cancer. So Julia is going to have a mastectomy to avoid chemo. Talk abou the skinny shaming photos of her. (I dunno, she looked ill in those photos, not gonna lie.) Mark talks about Chadwich Boseman and how he seemed to him dour and removed. Mark then goes into saying how you should never judge someone's looks or how they are. Oh please. You love judging people who have the temerity to give constructive criticism, eh Mrs. P? Nads talks some more about Julia's cyst situation and she was told to get one the next year and that is when they found it. "Usually it's every 5 years, I don't know." 
Umm NO Nadia! It's every 2 years after 50, at least where I am. In the UK it is 3 years. CO2 news. Gas prices going up, Russia says they haven't exceeded agreements. CO2 is used for preserving food, dry ice. Talk about the impact on Christmas and turkey supplies. Nads says she won't panic and won't use turkey and no brussel sprouts. Ew brussel sprouts.
Nads can't do without her roast potatoes. Shortage of sausage rolls and toys. Nadia goes to search for her phone. Mark asks what can you not live without at Christmas? Mark says chicken flavoured crisps. Zoe says that M&S isn't delivering to NI this year. "M&S are having a terrible time. I wonder if M&S wanted Brexit?" says Nadia. Allie says roasted parsnips. Katherine says Midnight Mass and bonfires. Mark wants to go to Midnight Mass and Nads says let's do it this year. Atheists at a Midnight Mass? (I remember going to Midnight Mass as a kid and falling asleep with my pillow in the pew.) John says at KFC one day there is gravy, the next day there isn't. He goes to KFC on consecutive days? HP sauce, gammon, HRT shortages and Nadia says "Don't say that!" Tracey says isn't the moral that we need to buy local? She is vegan and gets her veg grown in London. (I don't know if I said this before, but I Googled and found out that Britain imports 80% of it's food.) Nostalgic dishes. Foods we ate when we were kids. Examples of Spam, Angel Delight, salmon paste in tiny jars. (I remember devilede ham spread sandwiches as a kid.) Vesta curry, sandwich spread, pea wet-by product of mushy peas.
Someone mentions Nadia teaching them to cook. Mark says he has been bitten on the side of his face. Must be the fleas. It's witch about Betty time. Nadia and her sisters wanted to try the Vesta Chow Mein, but Betty was against it, all scratch meals in their household. Quenchy cups. Bread and dripping. Mark doesn't know what dripping is. Ice Magic. Corn beef hash. Do you think pets are being kept alive longer than they should be? Some vet bigwigs have come to the conclusion that they are prolonging life over comfort for the owners. Most are saying yes. Sarah says they get money from it. Mark says they throw a dart at a board and hit a figure. (You know what? This is not a fair assumption. Yes vet bills are expensive, but that is because we don't know the cost of medical care for ourselves. Running tests costs money, plus the 4 legged patients can't tell you what is going on.) Nads says with Chi Chi they were quoted without options. (I find that hard to believe. Any vet I have dealt with does tests, makes a diagnosis if they can, tells you scenarios and will tell you what they would do in your situation, depending on what you are willing to spend and the pet's comfort.) Nadia goes on about not getting the sense of what it could be.
"Then you feel guilt for asking." Never have, it's my pet, I want to know everything. Nadia talks about not wanting to go into debt over a pet. Yeah Miss Moneybags says that. Tracey is a groomer and sees awful cases of dogs on their last legs. Talk about Noel Fitzpatrick and criticisms of him. What? Bionic legs? Mark wonders about that show, just because we can, doesn't mean we should. (I think him doing those things can potentially be useful in humans in some cases.) Pen clicking commences. One of Nadia's friends had a nurse say pneumonia was the elderly's friend and she wanted to punch the nurse, but after 2 years of problems with her dad she reconsidered that thought. I've had pneumonia and it sucks. Tracey had a client who spent 14 grand on hip replacements for her retriever and it couldn't walk. Well, that is stupid. Poor dog. Mark wants an ethical vet registry. "How do you unpack that?" FFS 
Faith says they sometimes use emotional blackmail. Who are these vets? Nads says these are only some vets and goes on about training. Finally Nadia comes in with some pertinent words, as she says vets struggle with money. Anyone who knows someone who works in vet clinics knows this, but Mark was surprised by the level of depression in vets. They have one of the highest suicide rates. 
HIT THE LIKE BUTTON, WE HAVE TO GO EDITING TO DO. Looting in London was the fracas on Oxford Street, some dude with a gun.
Whilst that was going on, people started looting that filth they are. 
"It scares the hell out of me. What the hell is going on?" says Nads. COME ON GUYS GET THE LIKE BUTTON TO 200. Nads tells card winners how to get their cards. Low traffic neighbourhoods-create more CO2 emissions. Nads wails on about them. They create traffic around surrounding streets and no material change to air quality. Mark says electric cars get into fewer accidents because of range fear-fear of running out of power. Nads' friend has an electric car and says it's a nightmare. Dramatic much? CLICK, CLICK, CLICK, CLICKITY CLICK OF THAT FRIGGIN PEN! 
This friend ran out of power and when he plugged it in, it didn't work. What does Mark have to say to that? "They've got to sort that tit out." 
Member's shite info, talk about it being a bargain, it is like a TV show. ANYWAY GUYS HAVE A LOVELY SUNDAY, LOTS OF STUFF WILL BE LAN....and it cuts off there. Laters! 
bit late with this, but this bit where she cries, and chi chi's picture is flashed up- like nadia's mary magdalene crying at the foot of the cross- is so bleeping hilarious....
Absolutely, terrible acting, hamming it up and watching herself on the camera. So false. If she was ‘choclit’ she’d eat herself.
I have to say I the dry crying, face pulling, inhaling/exhaling into the camera and swaying around on the beach is very very odd
[
[
you're right. i should have put "cry" in inverted commas.
- Status