Nadia doesn’t articulate her points properly. She is a terrible panellist…but maybe her being so terrible is why she keeps her job. She stirs up anger and disgust, no even intentionally, she’s basically there as a joke contributor and ITV are taking the piss out of her but she thinks all behind the scenes actually like her. Just a shame she is able to earn so much from being there just to antagonise with her natural personality.
She tells us ‘all men’ are potential attackers, that’s probably not what she meant, but that is her issue all over…she doesn’t articulate well and is not quick-thinking enough to keep up with professional presenters in any unscripted debate.
I suspect what she meant is that there is no way to guarantee any stranger doesn’t have those tendencies, so when out alone women need to be making conscious risk assessments to avoid walking into a blind alley or across unlit parks during nighttime. I think she was meaning that no matter how much we tell the police these attacks aren’t acceptable and try to educate boys before they become attackers…a small number of dangerous individuals will always fall under the radar, so you can never guarantee that a stranger, particularly late at night or an unlit location, is NOT as risk. What she said though, made it sound as if ALL men are capable of attack. That is offensive.
If she’s worried about women’s safety, she should first look at the antics of her daughter who hangs around in parks late at night dressed as a prostitute, drunk and possibly smoking weed. If she thinks women should be wary of being attacked, she should be thinking about when and where those risks are highest, and which behaviours expose vulnerability.
Men attacking women will always happen, we just have to work as a society to reduce it as far as is possible, there will always be a random psycho that slips through. With Sarah’s case, the fact that it was a police officer is concerning, and even more so with details that have emerged that seem to be clear signs that he was either a threat to women at worst, or unsuitable to be part of the police force at best, yet no action had been taken. A different kind of case, but in the Plymouth mass shooting, there are details that made it blindingly obvious that the man involved should never have been given a gun license…there is no point being outraged at people who are sick in the head or pure evil, where questions should be asked and lessons learnt from these atrocities is related to why obvious incidents did not lead to actions that at least would reduce their chances of commiting these crimes.
She tells us ‘all men’ are potential attackers, that’s probably not what she meant, but that is her issue all over…she doesn’t articulate well and is not quick-thinking enough to keep up with professional presenters in any unscripted debate.
I suspect what she meant is that there is no way to guarantee any stranger doesn’t have those tendencies, so when out alone women need to be making conscious risk assessments to avoid walking into a blind alley or across unlit parks during nighttime. I think she was meaning that no matter how much we tell the police these attacks aren’t acceptable and try to educate boys before they become attackers…a small number of dangerous individuals will always fall under the radar, so you can never guarantee that a stranger, particularly late at night or an unlit location, is NOT as risk. What she said though, made it sound as if ALL men are capable of attack. That is offensive.
If she’s worried about women’s safety, she should first look at the antics of her daughter who hangs around in parks late at night dressed as a prostitute, drunk and possibly smoking weed. If she thinks women should be wary of being attacked, she should be thinking about when and where those risks are highest, and which behaviours expose vulnerability.
Men attacking women will always happen, we just have to work as a society to reduce it as far as is possible, there will always be a random psycho that slips through. With Sarah’s case, the fact that it was a police officer is concerning, and even more so with details that have emerged that seem to be clear signs that he was either a threat to women at worst, or unsuitable to be part of the police force at best, yet no action had been taken. A different kind of case, but in the Plymouth mass shooting, there are details that made it blindingly obvious that the man involved should never have been given a gun license…there is no point being outraged at people who are sick in the head or pure evil, where questions should be asked and lessons learnt from these atrocities is related to why obvious incidents did not lead to actions that at least would reduce their chances of commiting these crimes.
) but does she actually know what the word means?
“
Im beginning to wonder if she got knocked back by him when she used to act years ago.
he is SO unbelievably thick 
. Mark is wearing a magenta t-shirt, Nads has her hair wet wishing she put some mascara on. Is it some type of magical mascara? Because I sincerely doubt it would help. Nadia put a spoonful of what looks like yoghurt and talks with her mouth full. Welcome to the newbies. Nads says it doesn't cost you a penny and Mark says it cost you your sanity. No 
Mark says that Nadia is the most infuriating woman he has ever had the misfortune to have met. Nadia says not to take this to a sticky place. Mark:"I would like to!" "MAARK!!" 
Dixon is making a bracelet for his wife. Nads asks if anyone else has made something for someone else. Mark:"Have you made me anything?" Nadia:"Three meals a day mostly." 
Nadia says he talking about behaviour and said 40% of police are women. Kylie is a runner and last week whilst running in a park thought what if at every man she saw. Congrats Nadia, you have them freaked out, even though the majority of women are assaulted and killed by men they know. 
"Can I just say (making prayer hands), permit me this moment. When Nadia said all men are potential rapists, (Nads says "to me") not even to your, what she wasn't saying was all men will rape, all men could rape or can rape, what she was referring to, if I'm correct, when a woman is walking down a street and there is any man on that street as been proven this is where the Couzens story comes in, he was what you would call "the safest person visually and, you know, in terms of authority on the street, women have to assume the worst of every man they are heading towards and that what if running around the park is, when I have let Kiki run and all that kind of stuff, you have to assume the worst and that is what you mean by potential. It's not like everyone of us will rape or could rape, it doesn't mean that." 
Mark is a road crosser and probably wants a pat on the back for it. "I know to her, I am a potential sexual attacker, rapist or whatever. I know I'm not, so I'm not offended." Nah, she's probably thinking eww it's that sweaty, pervy husband of that Nadia off the telly. 
Nadia says there needs to be a law about unsolicited pics and Mark says to tell your girls to turn the bluetooth off, as it makes it capable for someone to airdrop images. It's called cyberflashing. Nadia goes all it takes a village. "It can happen in your home, on the bus, in double maths!" Mark wants the gov't to say something. Talk about using wired headphones instead of Airpods. "200 quid if you lose one!" Nads says to the grils and boys that we have got to start reporting everything. Agree, paper trails are good. 
) Mark says along as they don't run out of coffee he doesn't care. Yeah, cuz subsisting on coffee is a good dietary plan. Dipstick. Mark says the country is settling for this crappy situation. Leeeeeeeeee's here! 
HIT THE LIKE BUTTON. Story of squirrel that stashed 42 gallons of walnut inside a van after an owner parked under a tree. The feed is fucked. Nadia asks for nice stories and sparks of joy. One kg of nails, knives and screws taken from a man's stomach who was injesting them. Eww. He was trying to quit alcohol. "I think he's got a screw loose." 