Or never moved again. Murdered on P de S.
Yes. Their skills are incredible. They always pull better looking partners.
Well we know he didn't kill her to save his fortune, because apparently he doesn't have any money. She could have pulled someone wealthy, but she got trapped (not hooked) by that loser and then he might have killed her for more attention and book sales, so to make his fortune? She deserved so much better, didn't know her worth. So sad for Esther. Another great woman's life ruined and then taken by a sad little narcissist.
This is exactly what I think. She was constantly expecting him to turn up and it was like a game of cat and mouse in her eyes. She didn't want to go back - she was stuck in limbo. She kept him at bay with messages designed to be nice, but vague enough to be evasive. It would have been quite an anxious state that she was in. A controlling person would have been determined to find her and confront. The ' i think i can see you' messages were defensive and trying to elicit a reply which told her the situation. Emotions on both sides would have been bubbling up to a perfect storm, IMO. Maybe we are totally wrong but this is how it seems
It's all possible sadly. Murder / accident by going the wrong way. It's all still up in the air. So many unanswered questions. I just hope the police and forensics are able to solve it one way or the other. I hope they don't take the easy way out and just put it down to an accident because they can't be bothered to do the hard yards. I will say, right from the get go my instincts were up about Dan. It's that gut feeling you get. And I felt it immediately when I read the headline that he was the one who found her body. I had that same feeling when I read about the murdered girl in Greece, and I had it a few weeks ago when that woman in Wales claimed her back door was open and someone had taken her son.
Absolutely.
I think if that was the case, then he would have stuck closely to the search teams when they were looking, rather than going off on his own.
I remember at the time he did "his own search" (in inverted commas because of the arrogance of it) he stayed at the Venasque Refuge. I remember being astounded by that and I still don't know why he was allowed to do that. I always wondered if he was trying to get rid of evidence that maybe she has been there? Destroy any DNA. I have no clue of course. It was just the first thing that struck me when I heard he was allowed to stay here. And wouldn't you think the police would have stopped that as he could have contaminated any evidence that might have been there? Crime scene or not, he should not have been allowed to stay there.
I think that is exactly what I would have done. Once the police had done the forensics on the hut, there's no reason for him not to stay there. It's the logical base for conducting a search. The police have said there was no evidence of her staying in the refuge, so they must have done some due diligence.
Excellent point!
Call me a cynic but I believe he hid her so he never "spotted" her.
I would not put too much faith in a photo from a forum without a verified source. But if true, that fits in with taking a dangerous short-cut route from the top of P du S to La Glera pass.
Yes and sorry, the person says "estimated" places. I cannot edit my comment above to say that now. And I take your point about searching the way Dan did and staying at the Refuge. Fair enough.
Find me the bright yellow tent please or I call this staged.
I wouldn't assume the tent is outside the backpack. The light grey and red backpack is much more difficult to spot, especially if there is a lot of rockfall in that location (and, from the pictures, it looks like there is) - although perhaps a lot easier now given the remains have been found.
But the police reported the tent is missing. They have her other things.
