She does, but she's filtered to bits! We all would with that type of photo shopping!
She does, but she's filtered to bits! We all would with that type of photo shopping!She looks so good in the new SI imo
True! I also saw the video of the photoshoot and Jesus her face doesn’t moveShe does, but she's filtered to bits! We all would with that type of photo shopping!
True! I also saw the video of the photoshoot and Jesus her face doesn’t moveshe looks so waxy
she's makes my heart hurt.She looks so good in the new SI imo
her copper hair is ugly. i hope its a wig.she's makes my heart hurt.
her implants look like they are painful
ok???her copper hair is ugly. i hope its a wig.
???ok???
She does seem like the type of narcissistic parent to do something like this imo. The little boy should be able to wear what he wants to wear and have his hair long as long as it’s his choice.
She tries so hard to appear well-read and intelligent and then she goes and uses the word ‘irregardless’.
From recent pictures, it looks like just one still presents as feminine (the eldest, Noah), the younger two just seem to have long hair but wear boyish-looking clothes. I've no doubt that she *loves* being seen as a cool mom who lets her kids be gender non-conforming but only one of her kids seems to presenting as a girl, rather than all three. I'm sure she's delighted with that as it makes her seem so edgy and non-traditional, regardlessI think it’s unlikely that all three boys would have independently chosen to present as feminine.
Fair enough, looking at the photos now it does look like it's primarily the oldest.From recent pictures, it looks like just one still presents as feminine (the eldest, Noah), the younger two just seem to have long hair but wear boyish-looking clothes. I've no doubt that she *loves* being seen as a cool mom who lets her kids be gender non-conforming but only one of her kids seems to presenting as a girl, rather than all three. I'm sure she's delighted with that as it makes her seem so edgy and non-traditional, regardless
It’s a controversial word for linguists. I think it’s quite legitimate these days but it’s a portmanteau of ‘irrespective’ and ‘regardless’ that doesn’t really need to exist. But then, languages evolve, new words are invented…life goes on.But rich of that guy to claim Megan is insane for believing in witchcraft when he's talking about Jesus and praying for her.
Also I must be dumb too as I've always thought irregardless is a word
Personally I don't believe what the guy said as he seems to have an agenda, but I'm surprised she addressed him so publicly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?