Also "I'm not going to post photos of me crying" just allude to it massively so people will be intrigued. Also, a takeaway! Sacrebleu!"I disagree with emotional marketing"
Says the woman who (ab)uses her kids' cuteness to shill rugs, newspapers, and probably a traffic cone if someone offered her a freebie with an affiliate link.
She's got to be kidding
I mean his big (still little) sister shouldn’t be “helping” during the night, and I find this whole story a bit sad, I understand an isolated incident, but more than once, what are you doing dad?I'm sorry, but this one is too wild to scroll past 🫢
So have I got this right? The little guy wanders around the house in the middle of the night looking for Maman. Apparently his father can't comfort him (or is asleep?), so his five-year-old sister ends up stepping in and doing Dad's job? That happened more than once? And somehow the only takeaway is her own mum guilt?
If I were the husband, I'd be mortified to read this online. (I'd also be mortified that both my children were put in that situation in the first place.)
And what on earth makes her think this is a cute story to share?
Yup, me too. I guess none of us can call ourselves Parent of the Year, and we all duck up at some point. And obviously we don't know all the details of what happened. But at least have the self-awareness to reflect in private on what went wrong instead of turning it into a casual mum-guilt humblebrag.
Her marriage seems awful, I'd be livid if my partner couldn't even spare a second to text saying when he would or wouldn't be home. I can't work out if she thinks this is funny/somehow aspirational? Or it's a passive aggressive jab at him
Second passive aggressive jab in recent times I think. That post about the child not settling when she's not there was an obvious attempt at a mom flex/dad bash tbh. I don't think she's smart enough to realise most people can read between the lines of self-serving, self-indulgent posts like that and understand there must be real problems there.
The criticisms on her UPF Substack were entirely valid and not "hate".I would assume that is a question written by herOh please
View attachment 4022462
I'd bet money she wrote every single one of those Q&A "questions" herself. They're all about the things she never stops banging on about, and they sound far more like topics she wants to discuss than things her followers would genuinely want to know.
Complimenting herself on her "natural" accent? I'm not a native English speaker myself, so I may be wrong, but to me her english sounds incredibly exaggerated and cringey.
Always boiling it down to "people are just jealous because I'm happy and work hard". Yeah right...Oh please
View attachment 4022462
She already seems to use her elderly neighbour for childcare and talks like she, Manon, is doing her a favour by letting her look after a preschooler and a toddler!I'd bet money she wrote every single one of those Q&A "questions" herself. They're all about the things she never stops banging on about, and they sound far more like topics she wants to discuss than things her followers would genuinely want to know.
Also, she's so full of herself
And as always, we're treated to yet another lecture on screen-free parenting. And, of course, another chapter in her heroic saga of raising children without grandparents nearby.
What gets me every single time is her assumption that, if they lived closer, the grandparents would somehow be available for free childcare on demand, as though they don't have lives, commitments and plans of their own. The entitlement...
I agree, her attitude towards her elderly neighbour always sounds so smug.
Also these bookshelfs on the wall make a really distracting backdrop for her videos. They always look messy somehow with all the clutter she put up there...
