The first thing you do if you can’t find your child is look though, right? Then you don’t find them with a search and call the police. Who in their right mind would leave kids in an unlocked apartment then say “they’ve taken her”. You’d assume the kid got out of the door you carelessly left unlocked? Who was the they she referred to?Yeah I can see that the parents were told not to search. Because if you found your child you would hug them and will them alive and pick them up and possibly contanimate any evidence (well we would G&K would have their hands full of tennis rackets).
No one deserves to have their child murdered. You know who else didn't deserve it. Poor little Maddie.
I don’t think normal parents would say those things at allI agree and this important insight has been discussed before on this thread. My opinion about the McCanns changed after I had my son. The terror and fear i experienced when just losing him for an hour after school one day made the McCanns’ behaviour utterly inexplicable to me. You have to watch their very early interviews again to understand clearly that these are not 2 people in a state of panic about the terrible things that might have befallen their daughter due to THEIR neglect. Perhaps they were mourning or in shock, that is quite possible, but it is very clear from those interviews that they had CLOSURE, and that is a very different state of being to that open-ended state of tearing anxiety that is surely with you every minute of every day when your child is missing, possibly abducted. “At least we didn’t lose all 3 kids” and “after the first few days we started sleeping through the night” and “out of this bad deed good things have come”, my arse. No parent who believes that their defenceless little child is somewhere out there somewhere alone, hurt, frightened, calling for them, would say such things.
There is so way the general public would agree to chip their children. Most don’t leave their kids alone at night anyway!I'm just putting this here as a marker. But listened to a few videos lately saying they believe she will be found and this has all been done to bring in chips for children. I'm not saying I believe that but just in case I'm putting it here.
Yeah hubby and I have always had an uneasy feeling about those two "Doctors" and their friends....Yes. If you believed your eldest child had been kidnapped, there is no way you would leave the younger ones to raise the alarm. You would bundled them up and flee the apartmen.
Following this, if you believed your child had been abducted from the security lax Mark Warner hotel, you would definitely not leave your twins in the crèche AFTER your eldest had been taken. Even if you didn’t ‘blame’ the hotel, it would be natural to want to keep a very close eye on your children considering what had just happened. The McCanns had no qualms about leaving their twins in the creche, be if for a morning run or a press conference,
The dogs - Keela and Eddie - were ‘never wrong’ until the McCann case. The evidence they had sniffed out previously was always accepted until they sniffed out cadaverine behind the sofa of the apartment, in Gerry’s blue duffel bag, the fridge and the boot of the rented car. Suddenly, they were no longer reliable.
These are just examples of why I don’t believe a word they say. This is just off the top of my head. I wasn’t even a mother yet back in 2007 but when I became one, IF a I were to leave my children alone in a hotel room, abduction wouldn’t be at the top of my hazards list. I see my kids getting up and falling, trying to open doors or windows, climbing on furniture and hurting themselves etc.
This leads me to think that leaving the children alone was a to cover up something. Sky news, charity, Gordon Brown, the whole thing stinks.
It does show that the dogs were correct though even though they’d had people discrediting them - like people tried to do in this case. Plus they had pushed the dogs are shady narrative so hard of course they didn’t want that dragging up.To be honest, I don't have much faith in any statements made by the McCanns, or anyone accused of an awful crime, most people are self-serving especially if they've done something wrong.
In the same way, the McCanns ended their involvement in the Zappata case when he confessed to killing his wife, but this doesn't mean they were involved in MM's disappearance.
Obviously, it's impossible to prove something didn't happen, I'm doubtful evidence will be found now to prove what happened to MM. The German police contacted the parents and appeared to be confident that MM is dead, but they don't seem to have the evidence to prove CB killed her.
It's just so sad and frustrating, evidence may have been found if MM's disappearance was immediately reported to police, if the scene wasn't contaminated by people traipsing in and out and if the case was better managed by police
I completely agree, I hope she went to a family that really love her and don't leave her while they go out for dinnerI hope this is true. I hope she was taken to a childless couple and she grew up happily. As much as I wish this whole thing never happened, it's better than the alternative.
That's interesting, cos I think it's the other way round -- the advantage of a foreign country is, as we saw, bungling investigations, which can happen in the UK (Sarah Payne) but not that frequently. With that much pressure, UK police would have found Maddie within a week. I'd imagine McCann's had been to Portugal a few times, but I don't know.I think the only thing for me personally talking for the Mccanns innocence is that Maddie disappeared in a foreign country.
I do think an accident, probably happened and Kate feels more guilt. Maybe she tried to save Maddie, doing CPR behind the sofa, blood came out through Maddies mouth and got on the wall. Police did find traces of blood on the wall there.
But at the same time, it just seems so unlikely that McCanns were able to get rid of Maddies little dead body. That part is hard to grasp, Jerry dropping the body in a well but no one sees him, finds the body or anything. The corpse in a bag in the closet sounds very stressful for the parents. Even if Jerry is a cool person he is obviously getting stressed and angry when an interviewer ask them about the dogs.
---
If they were at home in Leicester it would be easier for them to hide the body, but in a small tourist town in Portugal it would be harder to get hide the body. I would have no clue as a tourist of where to go.
In Gerry’s statement he says that he checks on the children around 9pm…. After exiting the flat he then chats to a fellow holidaymaker outside on the street (the lounge window faces out onto said street). He then returns to the tapas restaurant.If she could hear her dad talking how was he at the tapas place at the same time?
Surely the risk of them not being there when she died is the same risk as not being there when she was taken? How would they know that the media would be on their side?
It would have been far more believable to say that Gerry was chatting to someone just in the doorway and Maddie slipped and fell and died. That's a tragic accident?!
They’re outside of what I’d consider normal for sure.They sociopaths then or what do you reckon?