Yes. Lydiot did not attend.
I'd wager
Lydiot canceled re: her attendance via that Parliament session. Why? Because
clearly, she'd have nothing intelligent or constructive to say.
The context was much more focused on questioning and defending the nature and role of influencers in advertising and is likely to take a more regulatory approach in the outcome. Lydiot likely realized she can't
gaslight her way through a meeting like that with people who are clearly more intelligent than she is.
And as
Keith Weed, President of the Advertising Association, so eloquently
explained below, this is one of the reasons why Lydiot's brand deals have dried up, she can't renew worthwhile contracts to save her life, and no large well-respected brands will touch her.
View attachment 660828
It's easier to gaslight, shift blame and feign jealousy than address their endemic and problematic ways. Lydiot knows deep down none of us are
actually jealous of her, and to be frank, I have a beautiful and generally stress-free life –– her buffoonery simply entertains me.
To say one is jealous... well, it just helps her sleep better at night.
Lydiot doesn't like herself, or her bespoke life, and that's the real problem she and influenzas like her fail to address. But it's easier to turn tables.