I just find it crazy that people can talk her 'out' of so many situations and that still doesn't ring alarm bells. Like weird comments she's made about the boredom, the note, the searches, the sheer number of babies etc etc. We've said it before but while yes on their own (well except the latter), you might be able to explain it, all together, doesn't that strike you as a huge red flag?
I think a lot of people are theorising and considering all angles rather than believing she's innocent without doubt, imo those who think she's guilty have much more of a bias view of what we are hearing.
For me context is key, there were more deaths and collapses than have gone to trial, what's going on with them? If deaths were considered so rare there, were these suspicious? Is it just that she wasnt presebt for them?
The comment about boredom isn't that odd to me, it's like soldiers who say they enjoy going to war as its what they have trained for; plenty of professionally trained people feel bored or stifled in some roles. Perhaps she didn't move jobs as she couldn't relocate or whatever, different levels often have nurses who have a pathway for feeds and so others would focus more on the medical needs, for example.
The note again depends for me what other notes were found, until we see those I don't know- this one seems to me like something she wrote whilst on a phone call and if we knew who that was to would make a difference.
If the rest of the circumstances are similar to baby A it seems like incompetence and lack of staffing across the ward and probably hospital is more of a factor potentially.