Lucy Letby Case #79

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Svilena "impartial and objective" Dimitrova has joined in as well
She’s unhinged. If she had any integrity she wouldn’t be arguing with people on Twitter about a Sunday Mail article on whether or not a bloody drama programme about Letby has been pulled. Do they think the CCRC or CoA care what Jed Mercuio thinks? (No offence, I’m sure he makes great TV).

They are that bleeping desperate though.

IMG_5697.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 14
She should keep digging her own grave, show the CCRC how bias this "expert witness" is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
Oh here it is. Confirmation of her own biases. She’s just like fool Gill and thinks no healthcare professional can do deliberate harm.

interesting many of her colleagues have disengaged entirely given the pro-Letby campaign seem to be able to say whatever they want with the media is support. Maybe, actually, they can see the flaws in your claims Svilena? And its backlash from your club they fear?

IMG_5700.jpeg
IMG_5701.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
If she's so interested in the legal angle she should be asking why Letby didn't call any expert witnesses - especially as according to her the prosecution case was so obviously flawed which she determined from trial reporting in the papers.

Has she mentioned why she disappeared from the Ockenden Review website?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
If she's so interested in the legal angle she should be asking why Letby didn't call any expert witnesses - especially as according to her the prosecution case was so obviously flawed which she determined from trial reporting in the papers.

Has she mentioned why she disappeared from the Ockenden Review website?
I’ve not seen anything but I find it weird she would write ‘ex-member’ in her bio

IMG_5705.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 11
Oh here it is. Confirmation of her own biases. She’s just like fool Gill and thinks no healthcare professional can do deliberate harm.

interesting many of her colleagues have disengaged entirely given the pro-Letby campaign seem to be able to say whatever they want with the media is support. Maybe, actually, they can see the flaws in your claims Svilena? And its backlash from your club they fear?

View attachment 3522883View attachment 3522884
A law degree does not mean you have an understanding of the CJS. In fact if you choose not to do a qualifying law degree you do not need to study any criminal law modules.
Most people who work in the CJS know it has its flaws, which are largely due to under funding, but that it is still likely the best system in the world. Sadly governments seem keen to run it into the ground.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
After continuing in his quest to prove he and his buddy weren’t lying their arses off mistaken
IMG_5702.jpeg

IMG_5703.jpeg



He’s now decided to take a break from X. Hallelujah!

IMG_5712.jpeg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 14
After continuing in his quest to prove he and his buddy weren’t lying their arses off mistaken
View attachment 3523273
View attachment 3523285


He’s now decided to take a break from X. Hallelujah!

View attachment 3523283
Now the tiresome idiot is trying to drag Jimmy Mulville into it.

That last paragraph is one of the most dishonest things I've read in a long time.

It's nauseating to see these bad actors gaslighting about the standard of care in the NHS in an attempt to deflect from Letby's convictions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 11
Now the tiresome idiot is trying to drag Jimmy Mulville into it.

That last paragraph is one of the most dishonest things I've read in a long time.

It's nauseating to see these bad actors gaslighting about the standard of care in the NHS in an attempt to deflect from Letby's convictions.
Will Jimmy Mulville even care? Dr Phil Hammond is dragging this down to the level of a primary school spatt.

Dr Svilena seems only out for increasing her public profile on the back of babies who have been deliberately hurt. The reasons given in her reports are ridiculous but she hides behind her professional titles and hopes that the readers won't understand how implausible the claims are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Will Jimmy Mulville even care? Dr Phil Hammond is dragging this down to the level of a primary school spatt.

Dr Svilena seems only out for increasing her public profile on the back of babies who have been deliberately hurt. The reasons given in her reports are ridiculous but she hides behind her professional titles and hopes that the readers won't understand how implausible the claims are.
Are her reports online somewhere?
 
I don't think so. I've not read her reports just going of the summary Mark Mcdonald gave in press conference number 1.
This makes me wonder if any of her work has actually gone to the CCRC. Her twitter was private but in the last few days she's gone nuclear - as if maybe she is miffed she's been left out - hence begging Cheshire police to let her get involved. Phil Hammond posted on twitter that she had done a report with Dr Ismail and Professor Alan Wayne Jones but if it is this one she's not credited.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
On twitter Dr Dimitrova posts that she lectures "on the flaws of the criminal justice system when it comes to prosecuting medical professionals"

I'm struggling to think of any medical professionals in the UK who have been wrongly prosecuted.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 9
On twitter Dr Dimitrova posts that she lectures "on the flaws of the criminal justice system when it comes to prosecuting medical professionals"

I'm struggling to think of any medical professionals in the UK who have been wrongly prosecuted.
Sure she will make a great expert witness then 🫠
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 9
Oh here it is. Confirmation of her own biases. She’s just like fool Gill and thinks no healthcare professional can do deliberate harm.

interesting many of her colleagues have disengaged entirely given the pro-Letby campaign seem to be able to say whatever they want with the media is support. Maybe, actually, they can see the flaws in your claims Svilena? And its backlash from your club they fear?

View attachment 3522883View attachment 3522884
Who are these multitudes she refers to, the 'everyone who has kept up to date with this trial...' being 'in disbelief'? Where are they?....the 'everyone' being of interest, here? The usual suspects, who we all know or a fictitious band of medically trained folk who have rallied to her cause? I don't see hordes coming forward to openly support her. Oh. Hang on a minute. They've 'disengaged'!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
On twitter Dr Dimitrova posts that she lectures "on the flaws of the criminal justice system when it comes to prosecuting medical professionals"

I'm struggling to think of any medical professionals in the UK who have been wrongly prosecuted.
I can instantly, David Sellu. Very famous case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I can instantly, David Sellu. Very famous case.
Thanks. That's one - 10 years ago - gross negligent manslaughter. I'm sure there will be others but whether this is a significant problem with the CJ system...?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Who are these multitudes she refers to, the 'everyone who has kept up to date with this trial...' being 'in disbelief'? Where are they?....the 'everyone' being of interest, here? The usual suspects, who we all know or a fictitious band of medically trained folk who have rallied to her cause? I don't see hordes coming forward to openly support her. Oh. Hang on a minute. They've 'disengaged'!
If the prosecution medical evidence was "bizzare pseudoscientific theories" surely Letby's experts would have been able to undermine them at the trial? And then again at the retrial it should have been easy to show that the convictions were unsafe - but in the event the convictions were admitted as agreed evidence.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 10
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.