Or even the police when they were investigating. I mean, it's not like they go through phone records ALL the time is it? Thank God for the armchair detectives of TwitterI’ve heard them say it was a time zone issue and the phone logs were an hour out
if only Ben Myers KC had thought of that. He’s so inexperienced
Benjamin Myers KC - Overview CV | Exchange Chambers
Ben specialises in serious crime. He is instructed consistently in cases of murder, manslaughter, high value fraud, money laundering...www.exchangechambers.co.uk
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I’m confused how a time zone could even be the explanation? Do they mean the time zone of the phone company meaning the records had the wrong time?
They’re not surely suggesting mum and the hospital were on different time zones right?? Although that wouldn’t surprise me if that’s what some of them mean
They’re not surely suggesting mum and the hospital were on different time zones right?? Although that wouldn’t surprise me if that’s what some of them mean
Yeah they were suggesting mum actually came down at 10pm as it’s fits their version of events better. And that whilst the phone records say the call she made was just after 9pm, it was just after 10pm as the records were 1hour out.I’m confused how a time zone could even be the explanation? Do they mean the time zone of the phone company meaning the records had the wrong time?
They’re not surely suggesting mum and the hospital were on different time zones right?? Although that wouldn’t surprise me if that’s what some of them mean
They fail to mention that Lucy isn’t saying she told mum the blood around her baby’s mouth was from tube irritation and to go away at ten rather than nine. She says that whole interaction didn’t happen at all. The idea the mother invented that whole scenario is unimaginable. Who could be telling the truth 
the reliable witness or the defendant that repeatedly lied to the jury
the reliable witness or the defendant that repeatedly lied to the jury
Last edited:
Honestly these people are genuinely mental aren’t they. As @MmmB777 has just said, LL herself has said none of it even happened so you’ve got actual phone records, regardless of times, proving it did in fact happen and LL said it didn’t…so she lied. Which brings us back full circle to what I always talk about and that’s how significant it is for someone to lie, under oath, on the stand
The condolence card which she said she wrote at home which was proved she photographed at the hospital where the baby died and never actually sent to the parents who I think barely knew her.
That was baby I's condolence card. The triplets was a note on a post it note - saying it was their first birthday but they were not there. When one of them obviously was still living and celebrating his first birthday.
She also wrote on it that nobody would be thinking of them on their birthday except her. Sick witch.
Thought you fellas might enjoy this read
bencole4.substack.com
Is the latest Lucy Letby appeal doomed to failure?
It's not looking good at all.
Brilliant from BenThought you fellas might enjoy this read
Is the latest Lucy Letby appeal doomed to failure?
It's not looking good at all.
++++++++++++
That is fabulousBrilliant from Ben
Eminently reassuring that any grounds for appeal are seriously flawed.
It will be a world leading failure
This is a really good article. Is this the same Ben that was on the Unherd thing? He's done a fantastic job.Thought you fellas might enjoy this read
Is the latest Lucy Letby appeal doomed to failure?
It's not looking good at all.
Wow, this is incredibly interesting and helpful for someone like me who had taken a break from following the appeal.Thought you fellas might enjoy this read
Is the latest Lucy Letby appeal doomed to failure?
It's not looking good at all.
Thanks for posting @MmmB777
What "bombshell"? Just more going over the same grounds as before
And why would anyone question the parents being granted anonymity? What purpose would naming them serve? Other than enabling the Letby ghouls to harrass them
If the identity of the parents is known the children can't be anonymous.
It's strange how they write about the post it note not being a confession, conveniently missing out the " I killed them on purpose "
Attachments
They are having a march on Tuesday. They must be worried that the public are going to forget their campaign.
- Status