It sounds to me like he doesn't really give a damn whether her application succeeds or fails. Has he even met Letby yet? It just seems to me that all he wants is the publicity for himself, he's obviously identified the public interest in this case and wants him some of that to make himself 'famous'
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Now that the terms of any potential engagement are clear, I will reiterate that I do believe in second chances. If you have trolled me to date and I have blocked you but now have thoughtful, respectful questions that have not already been addressed - and that do not risk compromising my position as an expert witness - I would be willing to engage constructively. Please get in touch.
How does she expect people to get in touch if she’s blocked them. Not very bright, is she?
Thank you to everyone who contacted me 
Calm down hun. The only people that message you are: Sex offender Chris, Merlot Mark and the many alt accounts of that lady that throws the birthday parties.
Calm down hun. The only people that message you are: Sex offender Chris, Merlot Mark and the many alt accounts of that lady that throws the birthday parties.
So these are thoughtful respectful questions must back up her point of view? We can't ask why she thinks Dr Brearey caused the liver injury when it's not backed up by the pathologist evidence? Why they are taking very very rare medical problems that they think they occured very frequently but just to Lucy Letby? We can't ask these questions unless we happen to be a consultant Neonatalist otherwise we will be trolling.
Yeah it’s weird she’s not posted all this time and now she’s posting stuff like this regularly. I wonder if she thinks because the reports have been submitted she can say what she wants now? But if she says anything (and she already has) that shows she lacked impartiality before she even got involved then surely she’s screwed, it they even get that far.
But there is also no indication she is even on these latest reports and her saying she knows her responsibilities as an expert witness doesn’t mean she’s an expert witness for Letby. Unless she’s still saying this elsewhere.
What position as an expert witnesses? Is McDonald actually going to be stupid enough to use her or is she just pretending?
It reminds me of the email Letby sent to the entire NNU claiming she'd been exonerated
INQ0058624 – email correspondence from Letby to all Countess of Chester Hospital neonatal unit staff, dated 31/01/2017 | The Thirlwall Inquiry
Examining the events at the Countess of Chester Hospital and their implications following the trial, and subsequent convictions, of former neonatal nurse Lucy Letby of murder and attempted murder of babies at the hospital.
thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk
She sounds like an absolute thundercunt
Because she only wants positive feedback that supports/reinforces her position?
ETA: Also, isn't she very much compromising her position as an 'expert witness' by being so vocal on social media?
Playing your full deck for all to see can't be the wisest move, can it? Less is more, surely?
Thanks for your reply @Tofino. And as you say, it makes absolutely no sense that you wouldn't want your new defence barrister to have access to everything possible if you knew you were innocent. You might not even think that your original defence team made mistakes, but you would welcome anything that cast doubt on any of the evidence.
No doubt she's enjoying the drama and continual attention. We saw during her own testimony how manipulative she is: for example lying about what she was wearing when she was arrested just to try to elicit sympathy.
As I said before, I have been largely trying to ignore all the talk about her appeal because I find it really distasteful. Letby's own performance on the stand showed her to be an incorrigible liar and a completely unreliable witness. There was so much more that showed her guilt aside from the expert reports. I wonder how MacDonald squares her disputing the time of when Baby E's mother came down with the expressed milk as an example? What is the likelihood of baby E's parent's being mistaken or even lying about such an important detail which was the beginning of what would have been the worst night of their lives? Or when she accidentally said that she knew what she was looking for in relation to baby I?
I can't imagine the pain that the families are feeling with this ongoing campaign.
Baby E's parent's testiomy was backed up by the phone records. Of course the Truthers think the phone company made an error.
I’ve heard them say it was a time zone issue and the phone logs were an hour out
if only Ben Myers KC had thought of that. He’s so inexperienced
Benjamin Myers KC - Overview CV | Exchange Chambers
Ben specialises in serious crime. He is instructed consistently in cases of murder, manslaughter, high value fraud, money laundering...
www.exchangechambers.co.uk
Have her supporters ever commented on the condolence card that she wrote for all three triplets? I belong to a Current Affairs group and recently someone raised Letby's case and appeal. I spoke up and talked about all the evidence in addition to the expert reports, but interestingly, it was my mention of the condolence card that really swayed some of the doubters. It was something that just couldn't be reasonably explained away.
- Status