Lucy Letby Case #79

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Daily Mail doing a two page spread on Letby pages 8 and 9 (Nadine Dorries and the political editor). As usual trying to undermine Dr Jayaram. Then on page 23 Peter Hitchens giving his two penneth about Baby K. I don't know how to link them on here otherwise I would do.
The Mail confuses me. Does the Mail on Sunday have a different editor to the Daily Mail because it seems as though all the pro Letby articles appear on a Sunday and during the week they are back to killer nurse etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
The Mail confuses me. Does the Mail on Sunday have a different editor to the Daily Mail because it seems as though all the pro Letby articles appear on a Sunday and during the week they are back to killer nurse etc.
Yes they and have a differing stance on various things.

I do wish they’d stop with all the noise. So sad for the families who can’t get on with their lives.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 15
Yes they and have a differing stance on various things.

I do wish they’d stop with all the noise. So sad for the families who can’t get on with their lives.

By that reasoning, no MOJs would ever be overturned. Not saying this is one, but there is never any harm in asking questions,
 
By that reasoning, no MOJs would ever be overturned. Not saying this is one, but there is never any harm in asking questions,
Nobody is getting their conviction overturned because Peter Hitchens and Nadine Dorries repeatedly wrote (misinformed) opinion pieces for the Mail on Sunday.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 17
By that reasoning, no MOJs would ever be overturned. Not saying this is one, but there is never any harm in asking questions,
Just admit you’re a fan already. Have the courage of your convictions
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 8
By that reasoning, no MOJs would ever be overturned. Not saying this is one, but there is never any harm in asking questions,
Not really - court processes exist for a reason. Potentially it could actually make things worse for all involved because how do you find a jury who is unaware of the case if there are more charges?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Do either of them mention that this was not one of the grounds for the Baby K appeal even though it was available?
No just hell bent on discrediting Dr Jayaram. They keep harping on about the bombshell email. Nadine Dorries saying he's eager for fame and becoming a TV personality. Well she's a former nurse, politician, minister and now eager for whatever TV she can get So look whose talking. Peter Hitchens cites two esteemed colleagues who are journalists at the paper, who say she didn't get a fair trial so if they say this then it must be true!! It really must be a slow Sunday for news as they keep regurgitating the same old crap day after day.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Heart
Reactions: 10
No just hell bent on discrediting Dr Jayaram. They keep harping on about the bombshell email. Nadine Dorries saying he's eager for fame and becoming a TV personality. Well she's a former nurse, politician, minister and now eager for whatever TV she can get So look whose talking. Peter Hitchens cites two esteemed colleagues who are journalists at the paper, who say she didn't get a fair trial so if they say this then it must be true!! It really must be a slow Sunday for news as they keep regurgitating the same old crap day after day.
What's so stupid about the "she didn't get a fair trial" claims is that she has only herself to blame - for this and for not making the Jayaram email a ground of appeal. If these decisions were on the advice of her lawyers then she should be claiming poor counsel - but of course she'd need to waive privilege which she doesn't want to do because of the avalanche of tit that would coming piling down on her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
Nobody is getting their conviction overturned because Peter Hitchens and Nadine Dorries repeatedly wrote (misinformed) opinion pieces for the Mail on Sunday.
It's a win win for the DM. The apparent doubt gives them license to write articles. Hitchens has done more on Letby than anything else. He must be the go to man for innocence fraud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
By that reasoning, no MOJs would ever be overturned. Not saying this is one, but there is never any harm in asking questions,
False argument. Very few question Letby's rights to use the processes available to her. What is objectionable are the continual PR stunts which will make no material difference to the outcome.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 15
I’m just going to put the full thread of their posts here as 1. Hammond can’t seem to reply to people properly so it makes it clunky to try and read in order 2. He may have to delete them given what he is saying is clearly false.

IMG_5687.jpeg
IMG_5690.jpeg
IMG_5691.jpeg
IMG_5692.jpeg
IMG_5693.jpeg
IMG_5694.jpeg
IMG_5695.jpeg
IMG_5696.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Wow
Reactions: 10
The whole newspaper story is all about nothing anyway. It was just a quick email that Dr Jayaram wrote which may have been missing a word, it wasn't a sworn statement. Ben Myers saw it and dismissed it so it has no relevance. The drama is in its earlier stages and the production company may be waiting until Operation Hummingbird concludes and they have the full story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.