I would imagine not until any new charges/new trial or anything from CCRC or (god forbid) CoA
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
According to unherd "It was not until late September that Letby’s former defence team was finally sent the email "
So before the Appeal for the Baby K conviction - but it was not used by the defence in the hearing on 24th October.
Of course we can't know why it wasn't used because once again this falls under the convenient umbrella of being covered by privilege that Letby has not waived. But this can be added to the long list of evidence that is not new.
When will people realise they are being manipulated by a serial murderer of babies?
And here it is. No surprise that the Court of Appeal knew all about this. Another time waster of an article.
'The email was disclosed to the prosecution, Letby's defence team and the judges at the Court of Appeal before her application to appeal her conviction in relation to Baby K.
'There is no material contradiction between the email and Dr Jayaram's evidence, so it was deemed irrelevant.'
'The email was disclosed to the prosecution, Letby's defence team and the judges at the Court of Appeal before her application to appeal her conviction in relation to Baby K.
'There is no material contradiction between the email and Dr Jayaram's evidence, so it was deemed irrelevant.'
Last edited:
Dr Oliver has put on X, a reference from the Thirlwall inquiry, saying Dr Jayaram first raised the issue with Susan Hodgkinson in March 2017
Christ these smooth-brained idiots. They think they're playing 4-D legal chess or something???
I think this is why it’s pretty insignificant. He had already informed an exec, who also has given evidence, that he walked in on Letby doing nothing. For him to write an email two months saying Letby called him would most likely be explained as either a missing word typo or some other context that’s missing.
How long will the CCRC take to make it decision?
They have said at least a year longer if further charges are brought.
So she won’t be out on Easter sitting at home scoffing Mini Eggs then like some of her bat tit crazy cult thought she would be?
I think it could take years because the double jeopardy podcast said the prosecution are given a right to respond to the CCRC too, so there will be SO much evidence for CCRC to go through. When you consider the length of the police investigation, the length of the trial, and that their “new evidence” is for every single baby. they will need to read trial transcripts to see what oral evidence the witnesses gave and what questions Myers put before them.
the Easter idea came from Mark McDonald himself - when he said he was going to the Court of Appeal - which in the end never happenedSo she won’t be out on Easter sitting at home scoffing Mini Eggs then like some of her bat tit crazy cult thought she would be?
That is yet more total balls from Mr Merlot
Well I think the Thirlwall closing statement from COCH shows that this is complete balls. Time for the alcoholic to sober up
- Status