what happened to all the new evidence from the sparkling panel of 14 international experts?
This just stinks of desperation!
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
This just stinks of desperation!
Oh my God.
I knew it already given the influence of Sarrita and Gill, but this is desperate stuff - basically admitting that he's building a case with the ramblings of random conspiracists, nutters and weirdos. How does he even know that person he spoke to was actually a doctor at COCH? And lol that what they said was probably not helpful. So professional. Wow.
At least he's got plenty of time to sit and chat to all these mentalists - like, the rest of Letby's whole life term.
Marky Mark is going to pick the Ginsters pasty out of his latest eminent expert’s beard, find a suit in the BHF bargain bin, slick down the greasy mop that’s been acquired by basement dwelling for 15 years… and present to the court
Professor:
His eminent world leading handwriting expert!!!
“Actually your honour..it says ‘they are evil’
How?! Just how are these ragtag bag of absolute misfits getting so much airtime? There’s mileage in the story but I’m sure people would read anything at this point. Maybe they should get an animal behaviourist to analyse Tigger and Smudge to see if they hold any clues? Personally I would be more interested in reading about people who have had dealings with the Letbys, there’s something not right about them. Also I was sure there would be people that knew the evil cow herself who had plenty to say but it seems not.
It was probably one of the social media nutters pretending to be a doctor. Lucy is innocent, she didn't do anything wrong, she was a scapegoat
I think SG will be very interesting indeed.
This is turning into an absolute circus.
This is turning into an absolute circus.
Wasn't it reported that the board at COCH deleted a load emails. I think she will be able to provide some insight into the cover up and how they tried to cover their backs following her arrest.
Last edited:
I think there may be loads of revelations. She would have been there during the fallout and a covering after Letby was arrested.
Someone shared this link on reddit
BMA responds to Dr Susan Gilby tribunal judgment - BMA media centre - BMA
Media release from the BMA
www.bma.org.uk
"When doctors raise concerns, they should be listened to and handled fairly, with a mind to understanding the situation, what may be going wrong and what needs to done to fix things. Instead, Dr Gilby faced a deliberate and concerted effort to force her out in response to her whistleblowing. Following this already appalling behaviour, management at the Countess of Chester embarked on a cover-up known as ‘Project Countess’, deleting hundreds of messages and documents in an attempt to escape accountability for their actions.”
Dr Susan Gilby, if you're reading (although chances are probably slim), please, in the words of Cap'n Picard...'Make it so!'
Ooooh, I'd missed this. Satisfying.Marky Mark is going to pick the Ginsters pasty out of his latest eminent expert’s beard, find a suit in the BHF bargain bin, slick down the greasy mop that’s been acquired by basement dwelling for 15 years… and present to the court
Professor:
View attachment 3425583
His eminent world leading handwriting expert!!!
“Actually your honour..it says ‘they are evil’
another bizarre rant from Hitchens
if you want to explain to me, in a civil fashion, why Lucy Letby is in your view guilty beyond reasonable doubt, I'll listen to what you say. I'm obliged to, as far as I'm concerned. Because I expect the same from you.
No need Peter. Just read the Court of Appeal judgment it's all there. It's you who need to do the explaining
if you want to explain to me, in a civil fashion, why Lucy Letby is in your view guilty beyond reasonable doubt, I'll listen to what you say. I'm obliged to, as far as I'm concerned. Because I expect the same from you.
No need Peter. Just read the Court of Appeal judgment it's all there. It's you who need to do the explaining
Last edited:
I am now wondering if Peter Hitchens may have a mumsnet account.
He’s so off the mark, deluded as always. Guess what Hitchens. WE don’t have to convince YOU of anything.
Any convincing is simply down to Letby’s defence to the CCRC, Court of Appeal and any potential new jury of her innocence. The burden of proof is literally on her now.
And this bit…
…that’s not how the justice system works honey! We don’t do second trials ‘just incase’ ! You need grounds, and you have none. Which is why her fame hungry barrister is on YouTube pleading desperately for people to help him!
And who are these people saying she shouldn't be allowed to go to the CCRC? Or who said she shouldn't be allowed to appeal?
Yep I have no issue with this legal process. I’m not deluded to think the justice system is perfect - see the cases they always mention.
But the PR campaign, press conferences, co-ordinated news articles, YouTube appeals etc are what’s offensive. And completely unnecessary.
And seemingly based on absolutely nothing.
They seem to be against ‘trial by social media’ whilst expecting ‘exonerated by social media’.
- Status