Lucy Letby Case #79

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
And nobody is asking the question why Letby’s legal team are drip feeding their ‘mountain of new evidence’ to a media mouth piece? Wouldn’t it be better sent to the CCRC rather than Private Eye if it’s that compelling?
Most of it will never see a courtroom so this is the only opportunity to make it public.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
What I'm finding particularly despicable is that real children's medical information ( which would normally have been kept private) is being manipulated and falsified to try and drum up public support for freeing their attacker. If you think of any well known child crime victims, (whose photographs have been shown in the media) this would just not be tolerated!

Im pleased the consultants are not facing criminal charges. They were in an impossible position.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 19
What I'm finding particularly despicable is that real children's medical information ( which would normally have been kept private) is being manipulated and falsified to try and drum up public support for freeing their attacker. If you think of any well known child crime victims, (whose photographs have been shown in the media) this would just not be tolerated!

Im pleased the consultants are not facing criminal charges. They were in an impossible position.

Do we know this for certain?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Another innocence fraud piece with info leaked from Macdonald/PR team.

 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 5
Another innocence fraud piece with info leaked from Macdonald/PR team.

The truthers are very excited about this on X.

However Deb Roberts posts part of the transcript from Gwen Wark, where she says the equipment is checked before every test is carried out.
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
The truthers are very excited about this on X.

However Deb Roberts posts part of the transcript from Gwen Wark, where she says the equipment is checked before every test is carried out.
I wish they would make their mind up what the new evidence is. It changes every week! Anyone would think they were desperate for it to be anything.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
This is the point where the "Lucy Letby story", is likely to drop out of the news and people's minds. Now the Thirlwall inquiry has finished and any new trials or hearings are likely to be years away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
This is the point where the "Lucy Letby story", is likely to drop out of the news and people's minds. Now the Thirlwall inquiry has finished and any new trials or hearings are likely to be years away.
Why do you think any new trials might be years away?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
The CCRC process looks to be protracted with various layers to pass through. I think the sheer volume of paperwork will make it slow. That and the fact that Letby’s is not the only case they’re dealing with. Obviously the Court of Appeal paperwork and judgment(s) need to be read in full. Here’s a link

 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Another innocence fraud piece with info leaked from Macdonald/PR team.

Says McDonald's going to submit the CCRC application "next week" :D

Seems like every single piece of the prosecution evidence was flawed but noone noticed until McDonald came on board
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 14
Another innocence fraud piece with info leaked from Macdonald/PR team.

I've looked into this article. Dr Milan says insulin can be measured in two ways. When you convert the units the results the Liverpool machine aren't that wrong.
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 11
The CCRC process looks to be protracted with various layers to pass through. I think the sheer volume of paperwork will make it slow. That and the fact that Letby’s is not the only case they’re dealing with. Obviously the Court of Appeal paperwork and judgment(s) need to be read in full. Here’s a link

Also it'll take them a while to stop laughing after seeing the nonsense McDonald serves up to them.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
Former Supreme High Court Judge Jonathan Sumption has written an article in the Sun today outlining why he thinks Letby is innocent and criticising the prosecution.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Sick
Reactions: 10
Former Supreme High Court Judge Jonathan Sumption has written an article in the Sun today outlining why he thinks Letby is innocent and criticising the prosecution.
He can say what he wants. It’s not going to get Letby’s convictions overturned. Presume McDonald is networking and this is another publicity exercise for Team Letby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
Former Supreme High Court Judge Jonathan Sumption has written an article in the Sun today outlining why he thinks Letby is innocent and criticising the prosecution.
It looks like the original piece by him was in the Times (behind a paywall) and referred to in the Sun?
All very nice but I wonder would he be happy to allow his newborn grandchildren to be cared for by LL? Circumstantial evidence is powerful and completes a jigsaw. I’ve not read the Times article but it seems from the Sun piece that some of his criticism is the prosecution’s case that she changed methods to harm and kill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.