Lucy Letby Case #79

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
She’s a shape shifting, duplicitous, lying murderer.
The “ new” evidence isn’t new at all, the press conferences whilst going through the judicial process is grotesque and riddled with untruths and inaccuracies and her legal team are frankly a disgrace to the profession.
That’s all I have to say to the pro letby mob.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 14
.
Either they didn’t see the records or they had the records and still made lots of mistakes. Including when and where babies died.
Does Mark McDonald have permission to give the babies’ X-rays and medical records to random nurses in Canada and engineers? Did Dr Taylor, (the star of the first conference) see the medical records before he claimed, in front of cameras and an audience of Press, that Dr B had killed baby O with a needle? Because his brother is telling people on X that Dr Taylor had never seen them. Why are the Taste the Difference Experts any different?
Dr Taylor even admitted himself at the press that he hasn't seen any of medical records and was only basing his opinion on a reports that Aiton and Dimitrova had written.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Why aren’t Private Eye doing proper research? Aren’t they embarrassed by this? Anyone truly interested in the truth and justice would be asking McDonald directly what changed between 16th December and 5th February. Not sitting there on the front row clapping with glee like a bunch of performing seals because they are being told what they want to hear and don’t care about anything else.

IMG_4349.jpeg
IMG_4350.jpeg
IMG_4351.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
I actually went on X and searched for Dimitrova to see what people were saying about her since the last press conference and it’s like tumbleweed apart from those who aren’t falling for the latest stunt. It’s like December never happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I actually went on X and searched for Dimitrova to see what people were saying about her since the last press conference and it’s like tumbleweed apart from those who aren’t falling for the latest stunt. It’s like December never happened.
yeah and what happened to the exceptional application to the Court of Appeal what was going to see the case in court by Easter?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 12
yeah and what happened to the exceptional application to the Court of Appeal what was going to see the case in court by Easter?
They really had high hopes didnt they. But there's so much evidence, 10 months worth, that they are going to have to go through and weigh against the stupid McDonalds reports it will take ages. By which time hopefully she will have more charges against her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
Why aren’t Private Eye doing proper research? Aren’t they embarrassed by this? Anyone truly interested in the truth and justice would be asking McDonald directly what changed between 16th December and 5th February. Not sitting there on the front row clapping with glee like a bunch of performing seals because they are being told what they want to hear and don’t care about anything else.

View attachment 3440900View attachment 3440904View attachment 3440905
Phil Hammond said on his video, that Dr Hall approached him about Letby but wouldn't give him access to his reports, saying they were court documents. So he then had to wait for Mcdonald to find other experts. Dr Hall doesn't appear to want to be associated with the appeal.

It's very strange about the forgotten December press conference especially when such shocking unfounded allegations were made.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Phil Hammond said on his video, that Dr Hall approached him about Letby but wouldn't give him access to his reports, saying they were court documents. So he then had to wait for Mcdonald to find other experts. Dr Hall doesn't appear to want to be associated with the appeal.
Dr Hall always comes across as a man of integrity. I doubt he wants to involved with this circus.

It's interesting about Dr Hall's work which would have been carried out under formal instruction. Other than being part of a publicity stunt I'm not sure what status the new experts have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
Krapton is so full of tit. When was it either “cut” or “held back”. They read out a snippet of everyone’s favourite troglodyte Janet’s statement weeks ago when they read out a summary of the answers from the survey. Then they published it in full the other day.
Like you say, utterly irrelevant anyway.

Interesting article! Looks like very often people can regard somebody that’s utterly evil as really professional and trust worthy!


Shipman was excellent doctor, say colleagues
This article is more than 19 years old
Staff and agencies
Tue 28 Jun 2005 12.43 BST
Share
Harold Shipman was regarded as "practising excellent medicine" by his colleagues, a doctor told a disciplinary hearing today.

Dr Jeremy Dirckze is one of four family doctors appearing before a General Medical Council fitness to practise panel in Manchester on charges of serious professional misconduct. The GPs signed an abundance of cremation forms for the serial killer's patients.
Shipman is thought to have murdered at least 250 of his patients by administering lethal injections.

When Dr Dirckze was asked whether he ever had doubts about the truth of what Shipman said, he answered: "No."

Dr Dirckze told the hearing: "He was always regarded as being authoritative and practising excellent medicine. He was up there practising ideal general practice. He gave the impression of being above average. He was practising a superior level of medicine to the rest of us."

Dr Dirckze worked close to Shipman's one-man practice in Hyde, Greater Manchester. He countersigned 35 cremation forms between 1995 and 1998 for the mass murderer. Dr Dirckze is one of six doctors who signed a total of 214 of these documents.

Two of the GPs were cleared of the charges last December due to insufficient evidence. The watchdog's investigation has now reconvened to hear the cases of the remaining four.

Dr Dirckze, who still practises at the same Brooke surgery in Hyde, is accused of serious professional misconduct in relation to 12 of the deaths. He denied the charge and said he, other doctors and patients "trusted Shipman implicitly", before the killer's arrest.

He told the panel that there was no reason to suspect Shipman of any wrongdoing before his arrest in 1998.

Opening the case for the defence, Adrian Hopkins QC asked Dr Dirckze about cremation forms he was asked to sign by Shipman.

"Were any of the descriptions Dr Shipman gave medically implausible?" Mr Hopkins asked.

"No," Dr Dirckze replied.

Mr Hopkins asked: "Was there ever any reason to doubt the diagnosis or cause of death?"

Dr Dirckze responded: "No. They were very comprehensive."

Asked whether he ever had doubts about the truth of what Shipman said, Dr Dirckze again replied: "No."

Dr Dirckze added that Shipman would often go "beyond the call of duty" to help his patients and would visit people "two or three times a day" when they were ill.

"That was his way of giving them more appropriate care than just sending them to hospital," said Dr Dirckze.

He added that Shipman was a popular doctor among patients because he gave them "a more personal approach".

Dr Dirckze said: "He came across as very caring and would go beyond the call of most GPs' duty.

"Very often we heard stories of what he was doing that the rest of us wouldn't dream of doing.
"He used to call in on an elderly disabled patient on his way home after work and would wheel him round the block in his wheelchair."

Shipman is thought to have murdered at least 250 patients with lethal morphine injections between 1975 and 1998.

He was jailed for life in January 2000 after being convicted of 15 counts of murder at Preston crown court, and he was found hanged in his Wakefield prison cell early last year.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 15
Crapton is telling lies again. In the article she claimed they were only released due to pressure from journalists. That isn't true they were always intended to be published on the website. As mentioned in the transcripts from the 15th Oct
1000000899.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 16
Krapton is so full of tit. When was it either “cut” or “held back”. They read out a snippet of everyone’s favourite troglodyte Janet’s statement weeks ago when they read out a summary of the answers from the survey. Then they published it in full the other day.
Like you say, utterly irrelevant anyway.

Interesting article! Looks like very often people can regard somebody that’s utterly evil as really professional and trust worthy!


Shipman was excellent doctor, say colleagues
This article is more than 19 years old
Staff and agencies
Tue 28 Jun 2005 12.43 BST
Share
Harold Shipman was regarded as "practising excellent medicine" by his colleagues, a doctor told a disciplinary hearing today.

Dr Jeremy Dirckze is one of four family doctors appearing before a General Medical Council fitness to practise panel in Manchester on charges of serious professional misconduct. The GPs signed an abundance of cremation forms for the serial killer's patients.
Shipman is thought to have murdered at least 250 of his patients by administering lethal injections.

When Dr Dirckze was asked whether he ever had doubts about the truth of what Shipman said, he answered: "No."

Dr Dirckze told the hearing: "He was always regarded as being authoritative and practising excellent medicine. He was up there practising ideal general practice. He gave the impression of being above average. He was practising a superior level of medicine to the rest of us."

Dr Dirckze worked close to Shipman's one-man practice in Hyde, Greater Manchester. He countersigned 35 cremation forms between 1995 and 1998 for the mass murderer. Dr Dirckze is one of six doctors who signed a total of 214 of these documents.

Two of the GPs were cleared of the charges last December due to insufficient evidence. The watchdog's investigation has now reconvened to hear the cases of the remaining four.

Dr Dirckze, who still practises at the same Brooke surgery in Hyde, is accused of serious professional misconduct in relation to 12 of the deaths. He denied the charge and said he, other doctors and patients "trusted Shipman implicitly", before the killer's arrest.

He told the panel that there was no reason to suspect Shipman of any wrongdoing before his arrest in 1998.

Opening the case for the defence, Adrian Hopkins QC asked Dr Dirckze about cremation forms he was asked to sign by Shipman.

"Were any of the descriptions Dr Shipman gave medically implausible?" Mr Hopkins asked.

"No," Dr Dirckze replied.

Mr Hopkins asked: "Was there ever any reason to doubt the diagnosis or cause of death?"

Dr Dirckze responded: "No. They were very comprehensive."

Asked whether he ever had doubts about the truth of what Shipman said, Dr Dirckze again replied: "No."

Dr Dirckze added that Shipman would often go "beyond the call of duty" to help his patients and would visit people "two or three times a day" when they were ill.

"That was his way of giving them more appropriate care than just sending them to hospital," said Dr Dirckze.

He added that Shipman was a popular doctor among patients because he gave them "a more personal approach".

Dr Dirckze said: "He came across as very caring and would go beyond the call of most GPs' duty.

"Very often we heard stories of what he was doing that the rest of us wouldn't dream of doing.
"He used to call in on an elderly disabled patient on his way home after work and would wheel him round the block in his wheelchair."

Shipman is thought to have murdered at least 250 patients with lethal morphine injections between 1975 and 1998.

He was jailed for life in January 2000 after being convicted of 15 counts of murder at Preston crown court, and he was found hanged in his Wakefield prison cell early last year.
They are also claiming the inquiry only published them due to pressure from the telegraph and other press.

✨ iT’s A cOnSpIrAcY ✨

More like it wasn’t relevant for the world to know what Janet bleeping Cox thinks and the inquiry has no need to publish all hundreds of thousands pieces of bloody evidence.

Even if you think Letby is innocent, why are people so opposed to looking at ways the NHS could stop a potential nurse killer? I said before, the nurse Y mentor is particularly alarming thinking the babies are all safe so there’s no need to do anything 🚩🚩🚩
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Crapton is telling lies again. In the article she claimed they were only released due to pressure from journalists. That isn't true they were always intended to be published on the website. As mentioned in the transcripts from the 15th Oct
View attachment 3442539
✨ oH bUt iT wAsN’t qUiCk eNoUgH! wE rEaLlY MUST kNoW wHaT jAnEt cOx oUr lAtEsT eXpErT tHiNkS sO wE cAn uSE iT iN tHe aPpEaL✨
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 11
They are also claiming the inquiry only published them due to pressure from the telegraph and other press.

✨ iT’s A cOnSpIrAcY ✨

More like it wasn’t relevant for the world to know what Janet bleeping Cox thinks and the inquiry has no need to publish all hundreds of thousands pieces of bloody evidence.

Even if you think Letby is innocent, why are people so opposed to looking at ways the NHS could stop a potential nurse killer? I said before, the nurse Y mentor is particularly alarming thinking the babies are all safe so there’s no need to do anything 🚩🚩🚩
Yes I think Janet Cox and Nurse Y have proven that they can't trusted to protect vulnerable babies from harm. If they refuse to acknowledge that one of their own is capable of harming patients. I would not feel comfortable with any nurse who was still supporting Letby caring for my child.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sad
Reactions: 15
Janet Cox can't mentally process the fact that she was friends with a baby killer.

Some of the nurses must have worked out what was going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Janet Cox can't mentally process the fact that she was friends with a baby killer.

Some of the nurses must have worked out what was going on.
I can understand why they would be some disbelief to begin with but Janet Cox sat through both her trials, she's got no excuse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Hahahaha why do they think Janet Cox’s (and others) opinion on Letby’s guilt/innocence matter to the inquiry? Is she a secret undercover police investigator and withholds the key to all evidence?

Talk about clutching at straws 🤣🤣
And conspiracies… thinking it’s withheld evidence rather than utterly irrelevant 🤣🤣🤣

I think Nurse Cox was Nursery Nurse Cox and wasn't a qualified registered nurse. She wouldn't have therefore worked in the nurseries where many of the incidents took place and wouldn't have been in the proximity of Letby when she committed many of her crimes. She cannot reliably know that the consultants scapegoated Letby for their own poor care as she wasn't present in the relevant rooms and didn't have the appropriate qualifications. She was photographed with Letby at Letby's graduation, was very friendly with her and is biased.
Hahahaha why do they think Janet Cox’s (and others) opinion on Letby’s guilt/innocence matter to the inquiry? Is she a secret undercover police investigator and withholds the key to all evidence?

Talk about clutching at straws 🤣🤣
And conspiracies… thinking it’s withheld evidence rather than utterly irrelevant 🤣🤣🤣

 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 15
I can understand why they would be some disbelief to begin with but Janet Cox sat through both her trials, she's got no excuse.
It was a bit weird going to the second trial when even Lucy's parents didn't go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.