This was the point i was trying to make in my OP. If there was overwhelming evidence that she had done this - then the likelyhood is she would have pleaded at the earliest opportunity.
I hear you on this, I think it’s possible she panicked and shut down under questioning. My brain goes dead when I’m randomly asked a curve ball question in a meeting because of anxiety, so I can only imagine the terror you’d feel in a police interview being interrogated about killing babies and might not respond normally, even if you’re innocent. Just playing devils advocate, she could well be lying to the police, but humans are complex and act weird - so I do try and see the shades of grey.
The baby wasn’t recovering even after 5 doses of dextrose. The problems continued throughout the day so the experts are saying it must have been in a TPN bag meaning it was the intentional because insulin never goes in a TPN bag. (So baby was continuously receiving insulin - a single overdose should have recovered quickly following treatment, is my understanding).
I think Ava was giving an example of how context changes a statement.
I don’t know, that’s why I said it would be useful to know the full transcript.
As a health professional, I've never taken an oath not to look people up on Facebook. Nor is it mentioned in any trust policy.
It really would, it makes me feel like this whole thread is kind of pointless. We don't know enough to defend OR condem her. Maybe we shouldn't I suppose, I get that the jury is far more important than the public in this case but I really wish there was some high quality objective journalism coverage at the very least.
Not really, Emma Tustin and Thomas Hughes had CCTV in their house, it was so easy to prove the only way Arthur died was at the hands of Emma. She still pleaded not guilty. Murderers have nothing to lose by pleading not guilty. They get a life sentence regardless.
Actually you are breaching confidentiality which is in policy and procedures and if you are a registered professional it’s goes against those codes as well. With LL specifically it goes against the nmc code
They will definitely get more context and alongside images of the paperwork. We get a couple of sentences every ten minutes, they will get far more than that. It’s frustrating. Yesterday showed very clearly how the media cherry pick stuff.
Was it Ted Bundy who repped himself in court and cross examined his victims?
In what way is it breaching confidentiality? Nobody else in the world knows who I'm searching or that they're a patient.
Oh my god!! That's AWFUL!
Exactly! I don’t have anywhere on my contract that states I cannot make Facebook searches. Absolutely ridiculous
And your just looking at what the person has publicly put on social media. It’s up to them what’s on there and what they share publicly. about themselves. It’s not like your looking up private info
Absolutely. I would NEVER go into a patient's private medical notes if I wasn't directly caring for them. What someone chooses to publicly post online is different. Employers do it all the time to potential/current employees. My trust policy actually states that they can search for and use my public social media activity in a disciplinary proceeding.
After seeing the text from the colleague saying things were odd about that night, I do wonder if people started gossiping and it got worse the more deaths that occurred.
