I might just have to join up then
I might just have to join up thenHope you gave her a good old fashioned left right goodnight
---
Totally free to sign up and they’re practically begging people to join tbf.
Defo don’t do what I did and screen record it and post it on here though, they were all crying and moaning about me doing that last time on there. Would be a terrible shame if anyone else infiltrated and did the same !
I wish she’d chosen larger bits of paper and spaced things out, as I can’t work out anything anyway!I feel a bit bad keep calling No Name ugly - there's nothing wrong with him, he's just an ordinary, awkward middle aged dad. It's just such a massive mismatch in looks and age compared to Lucifer.
I don't otherwise feel bad for him, he's sleazy for chasing after a much younger nurse, he's behaved terribly towards his wife, and most of all he was feeding Letby confidential information when she was already suspected by his colleagues of being a serial killer.
His decision to be anonymous is surely self-serving, both for his career, his reputation and his home life. However, I do respect the law, and other than my personal opinion on his looks, I have not shared anything that isn't in the public domain. It's not my fault that they failed to censor the post it note.
I thought they did censor his name out of the notes?I feel a bit bad keep calling No Name ugly - there's nothing wrong with him, he's just an ordinary, awkward middle aged dad. It's just such a massive mismatch in looks and age compared to Lucifer.
I don't otherwise feel bad for him, he's sleazy for chasing after a much younger nurse, he's behaved terribly towards his wife, and most of all he was feeding Letby confidential information when she was already suspected by his colleagues of being a serial killer.
His decision to be anonymous is surely self-serving, both for his career, his reputation and his home life. However, I do respect the law, and other than my personal opinion on his looks, I have not shared anything that isn't in the public domain. It's not my fault that they failed to censor the post it note.
Did you tell her she was thick as fuck?? I'd struggle not to at least cut them off and say you clearly haven't been following the trial and what your saying is uneducated and offensive so I think we better move on.Came across my first Letby apologist in the wild today. She was being really wilfully thick in a conversation about parents being over-involved in their adult children's work lives. She is adamant the unit was "failing" and the doctors ganged up on Letby. Quoted the plumber, even though none of the babies picked up water-borne infections that you get from sewage. I really thought they were all keyboard warrior trolls.
Wasn't he trying to catch her out when he said she had a boyfriend as she was denying their relationship?Just popped in for a little dose of sanity.
I'm thoroughly enjoying the unequivocal nature of the main reporting, I must admit. 'Evil baby killer Letby did xyz'. There was so long when we all knew what we knew and yet the media was all very quiet and softly softly. I love that they can now call her exactly what she is. And it feels like it counteracts all those 'conspiracy' nutters and all her stupid friends supporting her. The law and the facts speak loudly.
Things I'm not enjoying:
1) 'I haven't really followed the trial but it sounds like it's probably a miscarriage of justice'
2) 'I think it's a big cover up/she's a scapegoat' (followed by zero evidence)
3) 'If she wasn't white/this is a race issue' blah blah
4) 'What about all the other bad things that ever happened that LL wasn't present for? She must be innocent'
5) 'I haven't really followed the trial but here's a question that's been asked twenty times before but I can't be bothered to find out the answer so you do the work for me' (Tbh I feel this about anything ever asked on the internet which could be googled as well.)
6) The fact slimy noname gets to keep his anonymity. I hope his wife and friends have all worked out he's a baby murderer fancying cheat. I also hope he's about to be disciplined for blatantly slipping confidential information about an enquiry to a murderer?!? Surely?? Or will he get to stay anonymous for that too. I knew he was married and older from day 1 - I've smelled his desperate aging creep vibes on many a man.
Oh an as an aside, does anyone else think it's blatantly obvious that BNE meant 'Noname Creep' when he said LL had a 'boyfriend'? Some papers have been talking about a 'mystery boyfriend' and it's the same freaking guy - the married letch.
What confidential information did he feed her? Surely the police should've been involved in that and he could have got into serious trouble. Why hasn't he?I feel a bit bad keep calling No Name ugly - there's nothing wrong with him, he's just an ordinary, awkward middle aged dad. It's just such a massive mismatch in looks and age compared to Lucifer.
I don't otherwise feel bad for him, he's sleazy for chasing after a much younger nurse, he's behaved terribly towards his wife, and most of all he was feeding Letby confidential information when she was already suspected by his colleagues of being a serial killer.
His decision to be anonymous is surely self-serving, both for his career, his reputation and his home life. However, I do respect the law, and other than my personal opinion on his looks, I have not shared anything that isn't in the public domain. It's not my fault that they failed to censor the post it note.
I think he knows he did his job. All those times we got angry with his questioning I like to think he was doing it all properly so she couldn't get out of the charges.Wonder if this is worrying BM, all those people checking he gave her a fair trial, actually probably not.
When she was taken off the ward he was telling her all the things being saId by management, trying to calm her down (and get in her pants). He gave her lots of info about the triplets too before she got back from ibiza which I'm sure helped her plan her attacks.What confidential information did he feed her? Surely the police should've been involved in that and he could have got into serious trouble. Why hasn't he?
Yeah, because murdering babies isn’t cruel or harsh is it.Seen someone on that FB group saying something along the lines 'guilty or not guilty being sent to prison for life at her young age is overly cruel and harsh'.
Honestly baffles me how ridiculous people could be and very concerning that they could end up on a jury one day themselves 🫣
He gave her information from a meeting about the deaths of the triplets, and forwarded and email she shouldn't have had sight of.What confidential information did he feed her? Surely the police should've been involved in that and he could have got into serious trouble. Why hasn't he?
He did that hilariously awful true crime thing with Emilia Fox. The one with the milk bottle kids and her "walking around Chelmsley Wood asking questions"That Prof David Wilson is a jobsworthan old lecturer who crossed his path said to our class he was More interested in TV opportunities than doing his research from what I had heard. Also he’s a criminologist not a psychologist, so has no real expertise to comment on her mindset, only the crimes she and others commit.
Additionally he was on the podcast a few episodes ago saying the opposite (eg implying guilt) so he’s just looking for his payday I think
Oh, I can’t handle seeing pictures of these squishy babiesIt's just horrific isn't it
Snitches get stitches Mark ladThey’ve got spies
Us tattle eejits better watch what we say
What are us Tattle eejits 'anti'? Anti baby murderers? Anti conspiracy theorists? Anti evil? I will take that and happy to be an eejit if it means I'm on the right side of morality and conscience. And the daft sods ain't gonna know who is from tattle and who isn't!They’ve got spies
Us tattle eejits better watch what we say
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?