Lisa if you are reading here, I love you!!! 
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
"Didn't bother filling in the paperwork to have it published"
Translation: She never submitted it. Almost certainly because her academic supervisor had returned it to her as unworthy (probably more than once as it took her 7 years not to get a PhD) with volumes of notes on how & why she needed to fix it and she wasn't capable of doing so.
Translation: She never submitted it. Almost certainly because her academic supervisor had returned it to her as unworthy (probably more than once as it took her 7 years not to get a PhD) with volumes of notes on how & why she needed to fix it and she wasn't capable of doing so.
Cross-posted sorry - this is more informative than my post (and I was awarded mine by the same university so the information is the same).
Oh and none of her papers are first author papers - she'll have done some work that contributed, sure, but it's not as big a thing as people think.
Ah this was going to be my next question. If she has a ‘thesis’ available then why wouldn’t she submit it or how does it get rejected."Didn't bother filling in the paperwork to have it published"
View attachment 2401848
Translation: She never submitted it. Almost certainly because her academic supervisor had returned it to her as unworthy (probably more than once as it took her 7 years not to get a PhD) with volumes of notes on how & why she needed to fix it and she wasn't capable of doing so.
Can the university do anything about someone claiming they have a PhD from them when they don’t?
So on completion of a PhD, you would then have to write it up in a different way for peer review and journal publication. So no, they are not always published but if your PhD was worthwhile then it's worth doing. The PhD itself is evaluated by a number of people and then you have to attend a viva which is essentially the student being asked questions about their research and findings. My DH has a PhD in the very field she claims to be in so I'll ask him to do some digging.
The journal papers she has co-authored means she has participated in some way to the research. These are different to her PhD although she may have used some of the research from her PhD to help with these.
Journal publication means they have to be peer reviewed so experts from the field of study (professors, scientists) would have had to read the paper before it can be published to the scientific community.
Not sure if there is a way of finding out if she has a PhD bar contacting Cambridge to find out. She's clearly a toxic loon with absolutely no expertise in the area she claims to know about so she may not even have one at all.
Yours was much better!
I'll ask!
Can anyone shed any light on this please. Can any old person/solicitor lodge an appeal on someone’s behalf? or would Lucy / her legal team have to agree first?
@LilyRose1234 you know a lot about legal stuff!
@LilyRose1234 you know a lot about legal stuff!
Sure someone’s probably already said but Janine from Eastenders played Bev! I’ve not seen it but it was well received i think.
All PhD Theses from Cambridge should be logged in Ethos: https://ethos.bl.uk/
Here's how you submit your PhD at Cambridge: https://osc.cam.ac.uk/theses/advice-phd-students/requirements-deposit-your-thesis
(When I handed mine in I expected trumpets and angels. Instead I got a surly nod from the woman behind the counter, went outside and got more drunk than you can possibly imagine)
Whether or not your thesis is publicly available online, it should be logged with the university and findable via Ethos, as submitting it is a requirement of getting the degree. There's nothing in hers that's so controversial or weird that it shouldn't be. It's some fairly bog standard mol biol/biochemistry mostly on mouse embryos and some speculation about the possible role of two genes (FoxG1 and MeCP2) in autism spectrum disorders.
Here's how you submit your PhD at Cambridge: https://osc.cam.ac.uk/theses/advice-phd-students/requirements-deposit-your-thesis
(When I handed mine in I expected trumpets and angels. Instead I got a surly nod from the woman behind the counter, went outside and got more drunk than you can possibly imagine)
Whether or not your thesis is publicly available online, it should be logged with the university and findable via Ethos, as submitting it is a requirement of getting the degree. There's nothing in hers that's so controversial or weird that it shouldn't be. It's some fairly bog standard mol biol/biochemistry mostly on mouse embryos and some speculation about the possible role of two genes (FoxG1 and MeCP2) in autism spectrum disorders.
Maybe one of us should get a bit friendly with Dicky & get the details so we can report her!
I just searched a friend of a friend who I know did a PhD at Cambridge and it’s there.
---
His name is David Wilson. I think he often gets wheeled out for his opinion on various things like this. I don’t know what his view is now but I don’t think he’s seen as that credible.
Sorry if this has already been posted but what on earth is wrong with some people? What goes on in their head to make them think "Yeah, I will support a serial killer" Unfortunately, these people do walk among us
Attachments
I can't find that bloody Tweet (Xweet?) to ask him. He's got so much mad graph spamming and a dozen fuckwits all agreeing an appeal fund is akin to doing god's work. They do seem to be mainly male though not exclusively. I think half those pathetic twunts just fancy her. Lord knows why she's only remarkable in that she's remarkably ordinary.
Can you link me to the thread this one is on?
Some articles from him in the last few days
Lucy Letby confirms yet confounds our ideas of a serial killer | David Wilson
Her silence is a hallmark of the serial killer, but ‘beige’ nurse did not display the usual warning signs
www.theguardian.com
Britain’s leading criminologist: Why medics really kill
archived 18 Aug 2023 13:32:39 UTC
I think very similar to the reasoning of the perp. Drama, attention seeking, a narcissistic compulsion to be in the centre of everything.Sorry if this has already been posted but what on earth is wrong with some people? What goes on in their head to make them think "Yeah, I will support a serial killer" Unfortunately, these people do walk among us
The papers should be giving this NO airtime..
[
There's really no limit to the scummyness of some people
I say let them waste their money the daft fucks.
They must be collating IQ points among the "core"
I checked the guidance and it just says defendant/legal representative, not any idiot with access to the internet. I guess Letby could agree to have one of them represent her, but it would be daft.
Criminal Procedure Rules 2020 and Criminal Practice Directions 2023
The latest versions of the Criminal Procedure Rules and of the Criminal Practice Directions made by the Lord Chief Justice.
- Status