Wife: Welcome home, I’m pregnant!thankyouthere must be something in the water, sewage or pregnancy i’m not sure. Perhaps you could ask the plumber.
I’m so jealous of how much sex you have.Sware was just in the throws of passion with my man and couldn't stop thinking 'ffs watch a verdict come back and I'm too busy doing this'.
Just glossing over the fact they have an issue because you said you wanted to storm the court with an assault rifle, not because you're making some ground breaking commentary on the case, are we Dick? Reporting restrictions... you're not a reporter, you're not in the court or even in the country, behave
Was only a matter of time before someone pulled the “sHes NeUrOdiVeRsE” nonsense. She’s not been “collecting” handover sheets because she’s neurodivergent. She’s been collecting them because she’s a fucking monster who murdered and harmed babies, and gets some kind of sick thrill out of the handovers as trophies. I am fucking sick to death of this being the excuse (as a mother of two wonderful ND children).I'm fkn furious about this comment (and the ones after, in agreement). Just because she collects paper and struggles with social cues (apparently), she's considered neurodiverse? Even though I've openly admitted I have Autism + ADHD (and a dope, obv) here, would this excuse my behaviour/actions if I harmed a client? Honestly, the extent to which some people defend her makes me sick![]()
I basically started posting more here over Reddit, because I can call Letby a cunt to my hearts content and I get upvoted, not down voted cause I used a swear wordI’m thinking about our ‘echo chamber’ and actually I think it’s possibly the only place that’s allowed people to thrash it out. Reddit, Websleuths, Facebook are actually quite heavily moderated in comparison.
I think also the format of having a singular discussion thread is a different dynamic to places like Reddit and Facebook that have tens and hundreds of separate topic threads that would make it more likely to miss things.
I’d actually argue that out of all the places on the internet, tattle will be most like the jury. A group of people who know each other well, who are allowed to fully ‘argue’ the evidence (only thing that gets moderated is personal insults and thread policing).
If only there was a notable statistics expert interested in this trialI doubt you'll hear the split, just what the overall verdict is.
Just curious as to whether during the trial any statistics were used in terms of what the chances are of the same clinician being there when all collapses started? Because for me that would be as a juror, that would be a clincher. For example if if we heard that the chances of that happening was 1 in 736472637737738 then by sheer logic and mathematical probability there is simply not a chance it was all coincidence as the defence suggest.
I just don’t want to believe someone could do this so for that reason i think she’s not guiltyI actually haven’t even read the wiki or followed along the live reporting. I saw this photo and never looked back.
View attachment 2372290
This isn’t Heathrow you don’t need to announce your departureI seem to have aggrieved a few of you with my previous comment. Whilst this has been a fascinating thread with so many different facets I think enough is enough for me, I’m out of here.
What a strange question. It’s a joke. Rise above it Lazarus.Is that directed at people here who’s views you don’t share?