- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I imagine they will once the verdicts are in
This is the father’s statementAnyone clever enough to work out exactly which statements they are from the wiki? Would be good to all have a look
https://tattle.life/wiki/lucy-letby-case-8/#father
Scott Mills is good at calming nerves!!
Statements from count 10 and 11 for baby H. Hopefully Chester will give more detail but someone might be able to work it out before then.
Eta and by someone I mean queen @Tofino of tattle
Hmm to be fair I’d find that too hard to do. Most people would be curious as to what’s been said online etc. hopefully verdict soon
I don’t think they’ve any way of knowing for sure. I have a friend who works for the CPS and I asked her this, she said most of the time when a juror has been found to be doing their own research it’s because they’ve accidentally outed themselves by saying something that wasn’t part of the trial and then another juror has reported them
So the judge has read out the statements, and rather than being able to discuss them while they are fresh in their minds, they have been sent home.
Make it make sense.
Make it make sense.
BBC news alerts can duck off 
I’m hoping they’ve discussed all the murder charges and are now on the attempted murder charges.
We’re all feeling anxious here with no connection to the case. I can’t imagine what the poor families are going through. I really, really feel for them. Their anxiety levels must be sky high.
I’m hoping they’ve discussed all the murder charges and are now on the attempted murder charges.
We’re all feeling anxious here with no connection to the case. I can’t imagine what the poor families are going through. I really, really feel for them. Their anxiety levels must be sky high.
That’s strange. I wonder if it’s Dan’s mistake or something we’ve not been privy to. Were any referred to by BNE or JG in closing/summing up?Hmm from what was reported at the time, there were no agreed statements that were doctorsall the doctors we know of gave evidence on the stand and were cross examined.
View attachment 2334938
I thought this too. I hope they were able to make notes
Ok this says doctors who were involved in the transport and care of Child H to Arrowe Park.
Maybe they weren’t reported on if it was something short and straightforward.
However Dr Neame wrote a discharge letter. Maybe bit in bold is important (for what the jury want to see)
In his discharge letter to Arrowe Park, Dr Neame wrote: “Thank you for accepting this baby who has had two significant episodes of bradycardia (low heart rate) requiring resuscitation, adrenaline and CPR in the last 24 hours with no clear precipitating factors.
“Her care has been complicated by the development of respiratory distress syndrome and pneumothoraces (collapsed lung) but the acute episodes with desaturation and bradycardia do not seem to be directly related to the respiratory problems.”
Found this with bit more from Dad’s.
When typing my last post “Lucy in the sky with diamonds” by the Beatles came on my shuffled music
I would prefer Lucy in the slammer with diarrhoea (for life)
I would prefer Lucy in the slammer with diarrhoea (for life)
Jesus, read out the requested statements to the jury and send them straight home without being able to discuss whilst it's fresh in mind. He should have just dismissed the court for the day and said he'd read out first thing tomorrow so they could recall it all properly.
You know @Tofino ’s wiki is good when it’s being recommended on Reddit!
Attachments
The mail write up for baby H. Was it AV and DG that changed the ventilator because they couldn’t understand why baby still wasn’t picking up or maybe that’s a different baby actually.
- Status