Lucy Letby Case #41

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I have relooked at Reddit and there are now more comments about the insulin which BM talked about yesterday. If he has misled the jury because of his ignorance of the subject I hope this is put right because it is an important part of the trial.
Hopefully. This will also be the sort of thing the jury are able to ask questions about during their deliberations I think
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 11
Just a quick question, does anyone know? Given that it appears BM appears to have misunderstood the two insulin results and as such, potentially misled the jury in respect of the two " insulin incidents", will there be any opportunity for the prosecution to correct him/make things clear to the.jury,given that this is a fairly crucial piece of evidence?
Surely he can't get away with that, intentional.or nit?
The case closes with the defence, the prosecution do not get another closing speech when he is finished. Once the defence close the judge gives directions to the jury, he may wish to address this point if he thinks it is of relevance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
If I get one wish this year it’s to headbutt these two scabby bleepin no marks RG and Dole Green

Just piss off and crawl back under your weird 🪨 rocks
This is what proves to me how deluded they are. It’s one thing to think she may be innocent, it’s another to think she was an incredible nurse. It shows just how much they are actually ignoring evidence, they can’t even accept her excessive texting on the unit and the collection of paperwork as severe misconduct. They can’t accept her attitude towards her nursing colleagues, what has Mel Taylor, Sophie Ellie, Ashleigh Hudson done to deserve the attitude and ‘banter’ Lucy has aimed at them? They are not even part of the ‘gang of four’. But they still support Lucy over anyone else on that unit.

Does anyone know if it’s likely she would have been struck off if the paperwork had become known regardless of anything else? Or some sort of suspension / warning?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 22
This is what proves to me how deluded they are. It’s one thing to think she may be innocent, it’s another to think she was an incredible nurse. It shows just how much they are actually ignoring evidence, they can’t even accept her excessive texting on the unit and the collection of paperwork as severe misconduct. They can’t accept her attitude towards her nursing colleagues, what has Mel Taylor, Sophie Ellie, Ashleigh Hudson done to deserve the attitude and ‘banter’ Lucy has aimed at them? They are not even part of the ‘gang of four’. But they still support Lucy over anyone else on that unit.

Does anyone know if it’s likely she would have been struck off if the paperwork had become known regardless of anything else? Or some sort of suspension / warning?
They were allowing her to keep working despite the doctors’ concerns that she was harming babies (purposefully or not). I have a horrible feeling she would’ve got away with the handouts - if we’re separating them from her connection to the babies who died. She may have got a verbal warning or something but it seemed to me the head of nurses was very keen to keep her on the unit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
This is what proves to me how deluded they are. It’s one thing to think she may be innocent, it’s another to think she was an incredible nurse. It shows just how much they are actually ignoring evidence, they can’t even accept her excessive texting on the unit and the collection of paperwork as severe misconduct. They can’t accept her attitude towards her nursing colleagues, what has Mel Taylor, Sophie Ellie, Ashleigh Hudson done to deserve the attitude and ‘banter’ Lucy has aimed at them? They are not even part of the ‘gang of four’. But they still support Lucy over anyone else on that unit.

Does anyone know if it’s likely she would have been struck off if the paperwork had become known regardless of anything else? Or some sort of suspension / warning?
I doubt she'd be struck off over it but she would end up facing some disciplinary at work if they knew about the handover sheets, fb searches and amount of texting at work. I've known disciplinary hearings for a lot less but usually ends in some sort of warning. If referred to the NMC she'd likely have to do some training and reflection, but I don't think she'd lose her job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
I really can’t see how she wouldn’t be struck off for the handovers. It’s not one or two accidental ones from the past couple of weeks. It’s hundreds over years that she’s moved house, multiple opportunities to destroy. It’s a huge breach!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18
The case closes with the defence, the prosecution do not get another closing speech when he is finished. Once the defence close the judge gives directions to the jury, he may wish to address this point if he thinks it is of relevance.
Thanks..I didn't think BNE would get to speak again as such, but was hoping that such a vital piece of " misinformation" is allowed to be left like that...its worrying amdnhope the judge does think its relevant 😳
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
This is what proves to me how deluded they are. It’s one thing to think she may be innocent, it’s another to think she was an incredible nurse. It shows just how much they are actually ignoring evidence, they can’t even accept her excessive texting on the unit and the collection of paperwork as severe misconduct. They can’t accept her attitude towards her nursing colleagues, what has Mel Taylor, Sophie Ellie, Ashleigh Hudson done to deserve the attitude and ‘banter’ Lucy has aimed at them? They are not even part of the ‘gang of four’. But they still support Lucy over anyone else on that unit.

Does anyone know if it’s likely she would have been struck off if the paperwork had become known regardless of anything else? Or some sort of suspension / warning?
I was thinking about this last night. I don't think she would be struck off for the paperwork or texting etc. They will see the behaviours as unprofessional but fixable so she would probably get a supervision order. However she would have to do a return to practice course because it's been over 5 years since she last nursed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
I doubt she'd be struck off over it but she would end up facing some disciplinary at work if they knew about the handover sheets, fb searches and amount of texting at work. I've known disciplinary hearings for a lot less but usually ends in some sort of warning. If referred to the NMC she'd likely have to do some training and reflection, but I don't think she'd lose her job.
I agree and think she would possibly be given a caution or a condition of practice order...i know personally many who have kept their registration for much " worse" .
It's very hit and miss with an NMC hearing though, much can depend who is on the panel and also if she had many positive caharacter refernces etc! They have to " prove" her fitness routine.pracice is impaired and maybe she would have been able to talk her way out of being struck off for thise particular "offences"😳
Not saying I agree btw!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Those that were there yesterday, what was the reaction of the police when BM started talking about their investigation?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Those that were there yesterday, what was the reaction of the police when BM started talking about their investigation?
They didn’t really have any reaction as far as I could tell, they were just listening and tapping away on laptops.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Just chuckling thinking about the attack on DE and how biased everyone is and yet nobody knew about insulin poisoning until DE noticed something was up in two hypo attacks (one of his areas of interest is paediatric endocrinology and childhood diabetes) and they discovered there was a poisoner. What can that be put down to? His desperation to work on a case that, from his email, he clearly assumed would be a medical negligence case. It is honestly no wonder BM goes for the jugular.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 23
I was thinking about this last night. I don't think she would be struck off for the paperwork or texting etc. They will see the behaviours as unprofessional but fixable so she would probably get a supervision order. However she would have to do a return to practice course because it's been over 5 years since she last nursed.
I can't see many people being happy about her looking after their babies in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
I can't see many people being happy about her looking after their babies in the future.
Never ever happening. She’s toast. She’s thrice toasted, charcoaled, smoking toasted toast with extra toast on top xx
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 36
Are the police just essentially taking minutes?
I didn't get the impression they were taking minutes. I must admit I've been curious about why they are all there and assume it might be connected to Hummingbird. Yesterday I think there were about 8, last week I counted 11 and the week before 14. Not all on laptops some looking at phones, one last week was making lots of written notes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19
She would absolutely be stuck off for the handover notes AND texting patient information over FB.

Although clearly the Facebook groupies would gladly give their babies to be looked after LL 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.