- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
She was so anguished etc but had no bleeping issue still going back to work in her office job for 2 years at the same hospital around all these meanies. Brass neck of it!
That's the bit I noticed as well! BM's name is going to be on an angry post it....
The scream I have just had to internally scrumpt because my boss is having a meeting
That greasy centre parting is the biggest “cry for help” this witch has ever had:..
2:24pm
Mr Myers refers to the documents, such as the neonatal schedule, which have 'limits to what they show', as they "only show activity".
He says they cannot pin down a nurse's time at a precise time, at a particular location.
He says the computer-timed prescriptions are not 'definitely precise.'
He says the times are often made "retrospectively".
The review does not mention how long an activity takes - which can vary, Mr Myers adds.
He says the schedule provides a guide to timings, and does not show what somebody is doing when there is no record.
He says it shows that nurses may be shown to do more than one activity at a time.
He adds many of the events have someone to assist, and says other nurses assist colleagues.
He says when that has been the case for Letby, she has been treated in "the most prejudicial way possible".
Mr Myers refers to the documents, such as the neonatal schedule, which have 'limits to what they show', as they "only show activity".
He says they cannot pin down a nurse's time at a precise time, at a particular location.
He says the computer-timed prescriptions are not 'definitely precise.'
He says the times are often made "retrospectively".
The review does not mention how long an activity takes - which can vary, Mr Myers adds.
He says the schedule provides a guide to timings, and does not show what somebody is doing when there is no record.
He says it shows that nurses may be shown to do more than one activity at a time.
He adds many of the events have someone to assist, and says other nurses assist colleagues.
He says when that has been the case for Letby, she has been treated in "the most prejudicial way possible".
Worzel gummidge looky likey
Last edited:
As soon as I started reading the Chester Standard updates I just said oh duck offfff!
So circumstantial evidence is compelling only when it’s in her favour
‘The prosecution has a theory’, of course they do and obviously it has enough weight for the CPS to have brought charges, isn’t that how it all works??
Yeah, she was committed to her job and doing overtime because she was unhealthily obsessed with it.
She changed her methods of killing because if suddenly every sick baby died of an air embolus she’d have been caught much sooner.
She smiles in photos, well no killer has ever done that have they?
I don’t think I can bear to read any more. I hope the jury don’t drink this crappy lemonade he’s making from the lemon in the dock that is Letby
So circumstantial evidence is compelling only when it’s in her favour
‘The prosecution has a theory’, of course they do and obviously it has enough weight for the CPS to have brought charges, isn’t that how it all works??
Yeah, she was committed to her job and doing overtime because she was unhealthily obsessed with it.
She changed her methods of killing because if suddenly every sick baby died of an air embolus she’d have been caught much sooner.
She smiles in photos, well no killer has ever done that have they?
I don’t think I can bear to read any more. I hope the jury don’t drink this crappy lemonade he’s making from the lemon in the dock that is Letby
2:30pm
He refers to the subject of the text messages, which are "normal".
She was a "young professional woman with a life", and the messages contain "social activity and banter".
He says only when "you start with a presumption of guilt" can be taken as different.
He refers to the 'go commando' message.
He says a young woman, being cross-examined, being "humiliated" about something 'completely unrelated to what we were talking about', in front of the public, in front of her mum and dad, was inappropriate.
He says "You saw me raise to my feet more than once" about the style of questioning, and the comment about 'running out on your boyfriend [doctor colleague]' was inappropriate.
He adds the messaging was "unremarkable".
He says the basis of Letby being 'bored' was used as the basis of an allegation she went out to kill a baby.
He says "others were doing it at work" [text messaging in the workplace].
He cites four work colleagues who did so, and they were "normal...what you might expect".
He says there is "work, gossip, there is winning at the Grand National, there is salsa dancing...normal things."
He refers to the subject of the text messages, which are "normal".
She was a "young professional woman with a life", and the messages contain "social activity and banter".
He says only when "you start with a presumption of guilt" can be taken as different.
He refers to the 'go commando' message.
He says a young woman, being cross-examined, being "humiliated" about something 'completely unrelated to what we were talking about', in front of the public, in front of her mum and dad, was inappropriate.
He says "You saw me raise to my feet more than once" about the style of questioning, and the comment about 'running out on your boyfriend [doctor colleague]' was inappropriate.
He adds the messaging was "unremarkable".
He says the basis of Letby being 'bored' was used as the basis of an allegation she went out to kill a baby.
He says "others were doing it at work" [text messaging in the workplace].
He cites four work colleagues who did so, and they were "normal...what you might expect".
He says there is "work, gossip, there is winning at the Grand National, there is salsa dancing...normal things."
She’s not on trial for swiping boxes of pens ffs of course the timings are going to be scrutinised- this guy is a joker!
He refers to the 'go commando' message. He says a young woman, being cross-examined, being "humiliated" about something 'completely unrelated to what we were talking about', in front of the public, in front of her mum and dad, was inappropriate.
Ben, mate, this is the least of her worries.
Ben, mate, this is the least of her worries.
I'm sorry but asking her what 'go commando' meant was hardly humiliating.
Is he just reading out the mad witches post it's?
Exactly. If THAT'S what she's worried about after everything we've heard....trying to make out she's some maiden Aunt needing the smelling salts.
Hey mum and dad, I know you’re about to hear how I viciously killed multiple babies but I want you to know I’ve no idea what go commando means, even if the bad man in the wig makes out I do.
yes because all killers have it written on their forehead doofus
pretty sure theres loads of killers where people have had nothing but nice to say about them too
Ben is clutching at straws imo2:35pm
Mr Myers refers to Facebook searches.
He says those familiar with social media will look up people for all sorts of reasons at any time of the day or night.
He says it may be "no more than a handful of keys".
He says the prosecution identified a number of messages, and there were more messages than that, Mr Myers says.
He says the jury may agree Letby was a regular user of Facebook, and "rattle through searches".
He says the prosecution draw the jury's attention to the searches for parents, in connection with the allegations.
He says that would be a pattern in line with the theory.
He says some of the parents names of babies on the indictment are missing from the Facebook searches.
He says there are no searches for the parents of Child L-Q.
He says the searches by Letby also demonstrate an interest for parents of babies not on the indictment.
Mr Myers says that is "important", and Letby is seen as somebody who looks up names regularly.
Mr Myers refers to Facebook searches.
He says those familiar with social media will look up people for all sorts of reasons at any time of the day or night.
He says it may be "no more than a handful of keys".
He says the prosecution identified a number of messages, and there were more messages than that, Mr Myers says.
He says the jury may agree Letby was a regular user of Facebook, and "rattle through searches".
He says the prosecution draw the jury's attention to the searches for parents, in connection with the allegations.
He says that would be a pattern in line with the theory.
He says some of the parents names of babies on the indictment are missing from the Facebook searches.
He says there are no searches for the parents of Child L-Q.
He says the searches by Letby also demonstrate an interest for parents of babies not on the indictment.
Mr Myers says that is "important", and Letby is seen as somebody who looks up names regularly.
Why did she lie about googling haemophilia then?
2318 Facebook searches!
JuSt A NoRmAl PaTtErN oF bEhAvIoUr
JuSt A NoRmAl PaTtErN oF bEhAvIoUr
- Status