I’d need to check the wiki but I noticed this morning Sky said nurse can’t be named for legal reasons but it was actually Mel Taylor, named in other outlets. I am wondering if Sky are just not naming anyone after they named a baby in opening statements.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
"Were you looking for an opportunity to finish her off?" Mr Johnson asks.
"No," Letby says.
"No," Letby says.
From Sky:
After Letby finished her shift, she returned to the neonatal unit later that day - she claims to sign some paperwork.
"You went to visit Child G didn't you?" Nick Johnson, the prosecution barrister, asks.
"I didn't visit Child G, no. I went to do what I needed to do," she says, adding that she was sorting some documentation.
"Were you looking for an opportunity to finish her off?" Mr Johnson asks.
"No," Letby says.
Such a red flag she’s always going to the unit when not on duty. Is there really any paperwork so important is can’t wait till a nurse is next on shift for it to be signed?
After Letby finished her shift, she returned to the neonatal unit later that day - she claims to sign some paperwork.
"You went to visit Child G didn't you?" Nick Johnson, the prosecution barrister, asks.
"I didn't visit Child G, no. I went to do what I needed to do," she says, adding that she was sorting some documentation.
"Were you looking for an opportunity to finish her off?" Mr Johnson asks.
"No," Letby says.
Such a red flag she’s always going to the unit when not on duty. Is there really any paperwork so important is can’t wait till a nurse is next on shift for it to be signed?
I want to know why she did this. What she thought it would achieve. What’s gone so wrong in her life to do such heinous things.
Some of her answers like "that's not true" in answer to NJ's questions about "you inserted something into Child G's Airway didn't you?" make me feel a bit creeped out.
As in, she knows what she did, and she's saying that it's not true because they've got it slightly wrong, or not quite 100% correct in what she did do, and she's correcting them without admitting guilt in a way?
Not sure if that makes sense.
As in, she knows what she did, and she's saying that it's not true because they've got it slightly wrong, or not quite 100% correct in what she did do, and she's correcting them without admitting guilt in a way?
Not sure if that makes sense.
I think that when (has to be, not if) she is found guilty, there will be an avalanche of people coming forward with stories about her, as well as lots of professionals giving their views on her and her heinous behaviour.
Letby not Forgetby. You’re a bear faced liar.
And yet she misses details like her signature on documents throughout. No way was she there to do paperwork; she was there because it was easier for her to get to babies unnoticed.
Or because despite her weirdness even she realised it would be seen as odd to constantly be texting colleagues for updates so she went it to make she she got the low-down on how G was doing.
bet she was like a cat on hot bricks at home wondering what was going on and not hearing from anyone
Yes I have thought this too.
If the subject of this questioning wasn’t so utterly heartbreaking and beyond comprehension I’d be finding her “performance” hilarious. How she can stand there and answer these questions thinking that she’s providing a great defence? She’s bleeping tapped in the head and each day she’s coming across worse and worse. Are we even half way through the babies yet? Will be interesting to see if BM has any further questions for her once prosecution have finished…
NJ: "Did you go back and cook the charts to make it look like [Child G] was declining?"
LL: "No."
Letby says both dots are "in the normal range".
Letby: "I haven't misdocumented anything." Two dots are recorded in the 3am column [when Letby was not on shift], and Letby suggests someone else has misdcoumented.
Someone else AGAIN. It's just never her, is it?
LL: "No."
Letby says both dots are "in the normal range".
Letby: "I haven't misdocumented anything." Two dots are recorded in the 3am column [when Letby was not on shift], and Letby suggests someone else has misdcoumented.
Someone else AGAIN. It's just never her, is it?
It worries me that this is what BM is going to labour on in his closing statement. He’ll be like you have to find her guilty beyond ALL REASOANBLE DOUBT and if you think there is any doubt at all that another person could have done these things, even as mistakes and not meaning to do them, you must find her not guilty.
got a bad feeling about it TBH
Understand and totally agree!
But BNE can also hammer home that the only common denominator in every incident is LL and yet she has blamed a different person for each and every event which is beyond coincidental and looks like she is deflecting. 2-3 deaths per year and suddenly every baby she is involved death dies suddenly by a different person's duck up each time. It just wouldn't happen
Nehh, she’s proven herself a bare faced liar how the jury can believe that anyone else has made a mistake, just because she suggested it, would be beyond me.
Bile is produced in the liver, stored in the gall bladder and released into the intestine as required to help break down large.
I don’t know if you’ve got to the stage where you’ve thrown up so much that you’ve absolutely nothing left in your stomach and are still retching and this horrible green corrosive, acrid stuff comes up. That’s bile.
It’s never happened to me of course
Ah don't worry. Justice will prevail. This what she's doing on the stand is tantamount to hammering the final nails in her cell-like coffin.
It's a ridiculous performance and I'm sure it's traumatic for those she's firing bullets at but I just think it's utterly fantastic. The silly fucker is showing herself for what she is.
Ok
If the jury were to believe BM talking about reasonable doubt and not convict her then this would indicate snowflakes with no backbone and hopefully this won't be the case as the evidence seems so overwhelming and her lies are being proven to the court over and over.
"Letby agrees it was "an innocent coincidence" that she was the only nurse in the room at this time."
Aye, happens a lot this does, doesn't it? So so many innocent coincidences...
Aye, happens a lot this does, doesn't it? So so many innocent coincidences...
This is only speculation (well...obviously!) but if guilty I think she became a bit twisted at the thought she may never have the things she wanted in life, a husband and children. Like she was being denied something.
This is awful to say but I was watching the film Misery this week, and the Kathy Bates character who was accused of infant fatalities but it wasn't proven made me think of LL
- Status