I think if we are to believe LL did reflections for work - there would have been evidence of this at her work or home surely, in terms of documentation she shared with her manager or a colleague or in her desk? They showed evidence she'd cleared all her competency exams first time so did have access to all her performance related documents/assessments.
Unless I see BM produce evidence of her having done reflections for work, I can't believe it. Most importantly, LL was on the stand today and had the option to say that she wrote those names/dates in her diary as part of the reflection process she was doing. I can only work with the information BM and LL provide, not make up excuses for her.
Instead she's said. "Asked why the name of a particular baby is featured on one of the days in the diary, Letby replies: "Something has stood out for that baby...it was for my own reflection."
But reflection isn't just a nursing related performance term, it can mean she just quietly reflected on it for any reason (including the murder). The layperson on the jury can't insinuate that Reflection means how other nurses would do it, and LL hasn't given any indication yet it was for work.
Unless I see BM produce evidence of her having done reflections for work, I can't believe it. Most importantly, LL was on the stand today and had the option to say that she wrote those names/dates in her diary as part of the reflection process she was doing. I can only work with the information BM and LL provide, not make up excuses for her.
Instead she's said. "Asked why the name of a particular baby is featured on one of the days in the diary, Letby replies: "Something has stood out for that baby...it was for my own reflection."
But reflection isn't just a nursing related performance term, it can mean she just quietly reflected on it for any reason (including the murder). The layperson on the jury can't insinuate that Reflection means how other nurses would do it, and LL hasn't given any indication yet it was for work.