Lucy Letby Case #19

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
It’s definitely a hard gig being a juror on this case I’d say. The sheer length of time your life is adjusted. Some might think it’s just sitting down and listening to others all day but doing that can still be bloody tiring. I don’t know about you, but that amount of listening I just naturally yawn (maybe it’s my kid always waking up in the night) and it’d definitely feel absolutely awful yawning in such a case. I’d actually hate it, given the commuting to court (I don’t live that near to any), juggling two lots of childcare with even less flexibility etc…for around six months. May sound easy 10-4 but given the commuting and rigidity of all of it, no leave really for six months it must take its toll.
Just give me 20 years and I’d be up for attending.

Even if it’s not the football there’s going to be many more days someone is ill
Yeah and it’s winter as well, there’s so much stuff going round and I assume they’ve said if they’re ill they should say so they lose one or two days vs potentially a week or more if one tries to soldier through and infects the lot of them!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
To be fair it must be so hard to be a juror in this case, imagine they have spent a nice weekend getting ready for Christmas, maybe have kids or grandchildren then have to come back in on Monday and have to listen to the horrific details.
These children in this case would have been about 7 and been looking forward to Christmas too 💔💔💔
But someone denied them and their parents that ……
Totally agree with you, I have a 7 year old and every time I read about this case and all the horrific details and then look at my child I just feel utterly sick to my stomach. Makes its all more real somehow because I can see right in front of me how those babies should be now. I really pity those jurors having to sit there and listen to everything day in day out. 💔
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 9
I don’t remember is definitely less suspicious than “no comment” in my head anyway,

I think re her not remembering the fb searches, it’s a tough one because it sounds like she did a lot of searches for children not involved as well, she can’t be expected to remember every detail and reason why she made each search, I think G/NG she’d end up in knots if she started answering questions about them, I’d imagine she wouldn’t be able to justify every search from memory without getting muddled up, she might remember searching x y z but not others and I’d say that could be used against her aswell. so I think that part has to have been advised, I think there must be enough searches for the defence to be confident that they can plausibly say “I don’t remember” and it not raise too many eyebrows
I agree. Of course, she knows why she searched the families but in terms of her defence, saying anything too 'taxing' could open a can of worms for her.
Either/or, it was always going to be used as evidence against her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I don’t remember is definitely less suspicious than “no comment” in my head anyway,

I think re her not remembering the fb searches, it’s a tough one because it sounds like she did a lot of searches for children not involved as well, she can’t be expected to remember every detail and reason why she made each search, I think G/NG she’d end up in knots if she started answering questions about them, I’d imagine she wouldn’t be able to justify every search from memory without getting muddled up, she might remember searching x y z but not others and I’d say that could be used against her aswell. so I think that part has to have been advised, I think there must be enough searches for the defence to be confident that they can plausibly say “I don’t remember” and it not raise too many eyebrows
It sounds as if she was using Facebook a lot, she even sent a message about a patient to one of the doctors using the facebook messenger feature. It's something I can't really get my head around, tbh - I have a facebook account, but only so I can keep track of a couple of companies I use, I don't have any personal or family information on there but that's partly on account of a very persistent stalker who would have hoovered up any info I posted. Is it normal to look up people you barely know? I know some people are never off it, and it sounds to me like LL didn't have much of a social life
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
It sounds as if she was using Facebook a lot, she even sent a message about a patient to one of the doctors using the facebook messenger feature. It's something I can't really get my head around, tbh - I have a facebook account, but only so I can keep track of a couple of companies I use, I don't have any personal or family information on there but that's partly on account of a very persistent stalker who would have hoovered up any info I posted. Is it normal to look up people you barely know? I know some people are never off it, and it sounds to me like LL didn't have much of a social life
She messaged a Dr about a patient on Facebook!!?? Wtf!!? She's the same age as me, this is definitely weird. Why was she not reprimanded for that?? I know GDPR wasn't as big a thing back then but it would still have definitely been considered wildly unprofessional and inappropriate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
It sounds as if she was using Facebook a lot, she even sent a message about a patient to one of the doctors using the facebook messenger feature. It's something I can't really get my head around, tbh - I have a facebook account, but only so I can keep track of a couple of companies I use, I don't have any personal or family information on there but that's partly on account of a very persistent stalker who would have hoovered up any info I posted. Is it normal to look up people you barely know? I know some people are never off it, and it sounds to me like LL didn't have much of a social life
There was a big discussion about it on one of the early threads...quite a fair few admitted to being noisy themselves.
But...massive BUT...this was a nurse looking up the private life of a patient (family) and therefore it was highly unprofessional. That was never going to look good for her.
Messaging about a patient on social media...big no, no. Guilty or not. Personal devices can easily be accessable to others, if a phone is unlocked, stolen etc.
In my opinion, regardless of the verdict, 'invasion' of patients privacy (via personal devices) should be scrutinised across the board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
B32E88ED-D785-41D4-8240-2A12EA95C9ED.jpeg


I remember being baffled when I first read that she had messaged the doctor on Facebook.. Maybe this shows how absorbed in the app she actually was?
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 9
I totally get that LL is the one on trial for this, and some of her actions have been mighty questionable - BUT - so have the others participating in that behaviour! So it's not just a one way street, that's what I just don't get about this case. Of course it's highly unprofessional to message a Dr about a patient on FB - but why didn't the Dr report this? Lots of things just feel 'off' about this case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
It looks like she is falsifying notes again. Trying to make it look like it was written by another nurse
FD40C418-3948-42D7-9470-40770F7564BE.jpeg


I totally get that LL is the one on trial for this, and some of her actions have been mighty questionable - BUT - so have the others participating in that behaviour! So it's not just a one way street, that's what I just don't get about this case. Of course it's highly unprofessional to message a Dr about a patient on FB - but why didn't the Dr report this? Lots of things just feel 'off' about this case.
Maybe staff did report things and it got brushed aside like the concerns made my consultants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
It looks like she is falsifying notes again. Trying to make it look like it was written by another nurse View attachment 1785057


Maybe staff did report things and it got brushed aside like the concerns made my consultants.
True, but it feels like there must have been a precedent set for that type of messaging to occur, does that make sense?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
True, but it feels like there must have been a precedent set for that type of messaging to occur, does that make sense?
Yeah, I'd message my friends from work about work, but I wouldn't message someone I had no rapport with and wouldn't usually speak to. Sounds like it was the norm, well it clearly was if they messaged each other about whether or not they'd given meds or feeds 🤦‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Yeah, I'd message my friends from work about work, but I wouldn't message someone I had no rapport with and wouldn't usually speak to. Sounds like it was the norm, well it clearly was if they messaged each other about whether or not they'd given meds or feeds 🤦‍♀️
Yeh that's what I mean. I know LL is on trial etc etc, but the fact is that the Dr no doubt messaged back or at some point had set the baseline that messaging about patients on Facebook was ok. Nothing seems 'right' from the top down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
True, but it feels like there must have been a precedent set for that type of messaging to occur, does that make sense?
Absolutely needs addressing across the board. There should never be a reason for any medical staff to be discussing patients on personal devices, especially not on social media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I don’t get why she was on her phone so much at work. Surely she had better things to do other than scroll through her phone. Hardly professional.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
Its perfectly natural to talk about work but it's one thing to say, for example, 'Patient XXX is doing my head in...keeps calling for a nurse'

To saying (and speculating), 'xxx in room xx, has symptoms xxx. I diagnose him with XXX and dr has prescribed xxx.'
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
She messaged a Dr about a patient on Facebook!!?? Wtf!!? She's the same age as me, this is definitely weird. Why was she not reprimanded for that?? I know GDPR wasn't as big a thing back then but it would still have definitely been considered wildly unprofessional and inappropriate.
I know - I could not believe it when I read it. Completely and utterly inappropriate, but I don't think any action was taken against her at the time, shockingly!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
I don’t get why she was on her phone so much at work. Surely she had better things to do other than scroll through her phone. Hardly professional.
She ‘wasn’t sufficiently stimulated’ at work so had lots of free time on her hands.

Makes me wonder how stimulating she finds being locked up.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 16
She ‘wasn’t sufficiently stimulated’ at work so has lots of free time on her hands.
Despite all the tragic deaths well outside the normal stats for a unit of the size that shook all her colleagues to their core! Mad to think she was still "bored" isn't it!!?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.