She's an evil piece of tit. No one on this earth is that unlucky, she deliberately harmed these babies because she herself is lacking what it is that makes us human, empathy. A bored twisted freak.
I knew baby G would be distressing, as with baby I, that's not taking anything away from the other babies,, it's just so sad that both of them just couldn't escape her, no matter how much they fought. Just when you hear from the parents, it cuts so much deeperFirst time I’ve ever seen this case referenced on the news (tv wise) but it’s just been on the main ITV news. It’s nearly broken me a few times but the talk about baby Gs condition now made me cry for the first time.
Just going to say I was never asked to leave my baby whilst they did a simple blood gas….View attachment 1774802
a bit more on the incident here.
says that LL told mum to go while bloods were being done, mum felt uneasy and came back to find daughter distressed.
I also wonder if room 1 was the more secluded than the other rooms?Do you think there is something in LL causing harm to raise the level of nursing care. Seems like she often will become the named nurse after significant event due to her experience : often back into room 1. This could then serve the purpose of a God like / saviour complex.
Do you think there is something in LL causing harm to raise the level of nursing care. Seems like she often will become the named nurse after significant event due to her experience : often back into room 1. This could then serve the purpose of a God like / saviour complex.
Ya, it's really shocking to me that all these horrible deaths and incidents were happening pretty much every month and then by child J she was telling colleagues working in such nurseries was not "sufficiently stimulating" for her. (from the wiki about child J).She said herself she was bored and ‘wanted out of room 3’.
I think it was part of her motivation, she liked the excitement and attention she received in the middle of, an often quiet, night. Then all the texts after.
She was then able to show what a ‘great’ nurse she was by being the one ‘capable’ of looking after the baby when they had deteriorated. I’m assuming Baby G’s original designated nurse was less experienced. I wonder if she came across as arrogant?
I do think she enjoyed other’s misery and lacked real empathy.
It’s relevant because it was an important milestone, it shows how far the baby had come and how well she was doing, before arriving at the countess. It’s important because the attack just happened to coincide with an important milestone that everyone was celebrating.Why is the 100 day thing relevant? There’s no other mention of certain milestones correlating with attacks,
she attempted to murder the baby twice on the 114th day of life, a completely insignificant number and given the prosecution are basing there case around circumstance and patterns, the 114th day fits alot better than the 100th because in this case we see multiple attacks happen in quick succession of each other a number of times in this case and by that I mean we’ve got 16 charges (I think) that happen within a day of another charge, and we’ve got I think 8 charges that actually happen on the same day as another charge. Which is really interesting actually and for that reason my opinion is that the 114th day is much more relevant because it actually fits the pattern that the prosecution said would start to emerge
It's relevant because Baby G was born at 23 weeks.Why is the 100 day thing relevant? There’s no other mention of certain milestones correlating with attacks,
I wasn't asked, I was shoved out the room because my son was screaming so hard I wouldn't let them near him for his PKU and it had to be done.Just going to say I was never asked to leave my baby whilst they did a simple blood gas….