He’s definitely enabling her, without a doubt. And this means he’s putting Louise’s needs, a grown woman, before Leo’s. I think he also holds some resentment towards him though to write those words about ‘I’m sorry’ ‘I’ll make it worthwhile for you and daddy’.I actually don't understand or have many words.
Is Ryan as bad as Louise? Or is he just enabling her?! I'm so confused about the cards, why they've written what they have & why loving Leo (their own flesh and blood) is conditional?!
What. The. Fuck.
Millie and Louise never fell out did they? Louise was such a boring yes person then it wouldn’t be possible, and was why Millie liked herI’ve noticed she’s always boasting about amazing Ryan is and how much he has stepped up to the plate looking after the baby and her. She has always put him on a pedestal and now even more since their baby was born. It’s like she wants us to know how much of a catch he is and how lucky she is to have him as her man.
I also noticed that her and Millie follow each other now and Millie likes some of her posts. In her latest post about her anxiety and medication, Mille commented “You are so brave. Sending so much love. xx”
I wonder who followed who first, but seems that now they are mothers, it has broken the ice and they have put all their MIC 20something feuding to bed, seeing as their all in their early 30s now and settled down. Obviously they are not close friends as they don’t move in the same circles but they do have mutual friends like Binky and Rosie Fortescue and her sister.
I googled it out of curiosity. Nothing came up from when they were on MIC but I doubt Millie appreciated Louise's comments about her getting back with Hugo!Millie and Louise never fell out did they? Louise was such a boring yes person then it wouldn’t be possible, and was why Millie liked her
Already can't wait for his father's Day contentRyan’s lack of posting is interesting… is he saving up a Mother’s Day ‘having been both mother and father for a while. X product was so valuable to me #ad’ or another drip feeding attempt to keep us guessing.
Well, she's one to talk about moving on quickly! She overlaps more than an extremely overlappy thing. At the time of this interview she had been split from Alik for a couple of months and although it says here she's single about a week later she 'announced' her relationship with Ryan (which had obviously been going on while she was still seeing Alik). lol @ the hypocrisy!I googled it out of curiosity. Nothing came up from when they were on MIC but I doubt Millie appreciated Louise's comments about her getting back with Hugo!
Louise Thompson says Millie Mackintosh moved on quickly from marriage
Speaking about the author's relationship with former flame Hugo Taylor, the 25-year-old reality star admitted she thought Millie had been 'very quick' to move on following her split Professor Green.www-dailymail-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org
She left Alik for Ryan 100%Well, she's one to talk about moving on quickly! She overlaps more than an extremely overlappy thing. At the time of this interview she had been split from Alik for a couple of months and although it says here she's single about a week later she 'announced' her relationship with Ryan (which had obviously been going on while she was still seeing Alik). lol @ the hypocrisy!
This is SO accurate!She's a narcissist, he's a control freak with roid rage.
I used to nanny for seriously upper class families. They saw having children as a duty nothing else. They never showed affection for their children, just contempt for how much of a inconvenience they were. In each of the families I worked for I was one of many members of staff. The children got up after the parents left to do whatever and had to be in bed before they got home again. The only time they spent with their parents was functions and family events. They even had a maid care for them at Christmas.
As soon as they hit 8yrs old they were in boarding school, full time.
One of the boys I looked after never showed any emotion when around his parents, like little Leo. It's like some unwritten posh people book on how to bring up children.
Do you mean her ‘frock’?Oh my god that new photoshe’s actually holding her dress out as if to say look at me while LH is pushed to the back of the photo facing the wrong way
Wow I forgot that she used to actually be prettyI took a scroll back to the original face days… they definitely overlapped
Very insightful, definitely agree with this - my partner has wealthy parents and this is 100% true in those circles!She's a narcissist, he's a control freak with roid rage.
I used to nanny for seriously upper class families. They saw having children as a duty nothing else. They never showed affection for their children, just contempt for how much of a inconvenience they were. In each of the families I worked for I was one of many members of staff. The children got up after the parents left to do whatever and had to be in bed before they got home again. The only time they spent with their parents was functions and family events. They even had a maid care for them at Christmas.
As soon as they hit 8yrs old they were in boarding school, full time.
One of the boys I looked after never showed any emotion when around his parents, like little Leo. It's like some unwritten posh people book on how to bring up children.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?