I felt bad after reading the article. The topic is more than sad and yet I felt nothing. And I’ve cried watching reels of kittens (and I’m not even a cat person). I thought that my heart had finally turned completely into stone but nope, she managed to turn such a moving topic into waffle (as
@Seven of Nine accurately described the piece).
I imagine that Vogue wanted something from her and she was excited but then they wanted this and we know she’s not wanted to/been able to talk about her dad’s passing (and I respect that) - and so she managed to write about it without really saying anything, instead of turning down the offer.
The small bits that do share anything of substance was already talked about in a video - it seems to have been regurgitated with some Covid sprinkled on top? Maybe I would have felt more if I’d not heard her say similar things before but then is that a me problem rather than any critique of Lizzy? (Yes it’s a me problem - if someone wants to speak about grief and tell the same story 10000000 times then please do.)
and to be clear, this is not about her dad or her grief. I don’t expect her to make me cry so that her article gets more hits. I respected her before for not seemingly exploiting her loss, even though (devastatingly) loads of other (young and not so young) people have had similar losses and would probably be interested in hearing her speak more on the subject.
who’s the waffler now?!? I’ve contradicted myself….in my post and even in my head. I’m mindful that my “critique” comes across like I’m gatekeeping the topic and I’m not (and if I am, I’m sorry, I don’t mean to.)
But I don’t “get” the piece. The only bit I got a clear message about was the promotion of the book at the end. Buy the book.