LBC Chit Chat #20

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
The Lammster has kept a low profile during the second coming of the future (he hopes) PM. Perhaps he's hoping to remain in the Cabinet of whoever gets the job.
He's such a toady he'll say whatever is necessary to get another cabinet job. I haven't forgotten him around JD Vance. He's such a hypocrite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I can't imagine what job Burnham could possibly find for Calammity David? Maybe he could be Minister for Misspeaks, a new post to which he would be well suited.
There is a parliamentary bill on its way to stop MPs having second jobs. That will make our Bishop of Lamster nervous because if he does get the boot he will not be able to give his Sunday sermons on LBC.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3
There is a parliamentary bill on its way to stop MPs having second jobs. That will make our Bishop of Lamster nervous because if he does get the boot he will not be able to give his Sunday sermons on LBC.
Well without second jobs we won't have any MP as Ministers or on Select Committees....perhaps Mr Burgeon doesn't quite realise how parliament actually works...
 
Mr "Burgeon" must be a Freudian slip? :D Hopefully Andy won't be stockpiling designer t-shirts and posh sandals along with the odd campervan for all those Manc trips.
 
There is a parliamentary bill on its way to stop MPs having second jobs. That will make our Bishop of Lamster nervous because if he does get the boot he will not be able to give his Sunday sermons on LBC.
There is a God..
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Gissa job, Andy...Cringeworthy touting for Cabinet posts by former Starmer stalwarts.

Just pathetic, Burnham should bin the lot of 'em ,reinstate John Healey and Al Carns and call up Lou Haigh and Lucy Powell. Start again and try some new faces.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Despite my dislike of Starmer, if he agreed to it, I'd appoint him Foreign Secretary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I don't think he'd want to serve in any Burnham Government somehow? I think he needs to stay in the background and let AB appoint his own choice.
 
Despite my dislike of Starmer, if he agreed to it, I'd appoint him Foreign Secretary.
I agree with you. he does seem quite comfortable dealing with foreign affairs. I think he would probably be fine as a minister just very weak as a PM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
But would he want to sit on the front bench behind AB?
Probably not but he does seem to have been very good at repairing some damaged relationships between the UK and other countries. Good at being diplomatic and shaking hands with the right people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Starmer isn't a career politician, he'll resign as an MP and go back to defending murderers in the Caribbean. That a by-election will cause problems for the Labour Party with the lunatic Greens favourite to win will make him very happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Probably not but he does seem to have been very good at repairing some damaged relationships between the UK and other countries. Good at being diplomatic and shaking hands with the right people.
Yes but any savvy politician with basic social skills could do that quite easily. It's very easy to be sycophantic as we saw in Starmer's cringeworthy initial contacts with Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Starmer isn't a career politician, he'll resign as an MP and go back to defending murderers in the Caribbean. That a by-election will cause problems for the Labour Party with the lunatic Greens favourite to win will make him very happy.
Starmer isn't a man of integrity. We've seen through the carefully crafted PR image. He's thrown so many of his colleagues under the bus to save his own skin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
Yes but any savvy politician with basic social skills could do that quite easily. It's very easy to be sycophantic as we saw in Starmer's cringeworthy initial contacts with Trump.
True - mostly I'm thinking of how we used to have a shaved snow gorilla/scarecrow hybrid as Foreign Secretary to be honest so I suppose anyone was an upgrade from that.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 2
God knows what Boris got up to behind the scenes and just how badly did he compromise our security. I'm sure he was heavily vetted by us but the man was reckless despite his affability and desire to be Churchillian.

Burnham can't afford to make any mistakes appointing his FS. He needs to be able to work with him/her which would rule out bitter Keir.
 
God knows what Boris got up to behind the scenes and just how badly did he compromise our security.
Huh? I don't recall Boris:
  • Trying to give away British territory (BIOT) to an ally of China and weaken the security of UK and US military bases (and pay for the privilege of doing so) and trample all over the rights of the (former) inhabitants of that territory who want to maintain ties with Britain
  • Approve a security arrangement on a British territory (Gibraltar) that places UK citizens as second class citizens compared to Spanish ones
  • Allow oneself to become a laughing stock in the eyes of the leadership of the UK's most important security partner (USA) and become increasingly irrelevant to global events, such that the only leverage remaining is wheeling out the Royal Family to smooth things over
  • Threaten to cancel a youth mobility scheme (Turing) that covered more countries in order to join a more xenophobic European one at an exorbitant per head cost, which will likely plunge UK youth employment into even further crisis
  • Approve a Chinese embassy building over sensitive digital and financial infrastructure
  • Scrap a third country migrant settlement scheme only to realise two years later that this means more hotels, army bases and HMOs housing unvetted men from countries with differing cultures and questionable views about our country
  • Water down sanctions on Russia, Russian oil, and fail to deter Russian operations in the English Channel
  • Take legal action against UK armed forces, hire an Attorney General who has taken legal action against UK forces, and remove safeguards against retrospective legal attacks on UK forces
  • Allow his energy secretary to prioritise green renewable production over domestic energy security, resilience, and nuclear baseload production etc.
  • Fail to build upon existing trade and security partnerships with Japan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, USA, Middle East, Africa
  • Fail to do anything to safeguard UK democracy from growing trends towards nativist, nationalist, diasporic, tribal and ethnic block voting
  • Further weaken UK domestic food and agricultural production through punitive and blunt tax changes on British family farms
  • Take very limited action to support key allies in Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and UAE whilst they were attacked by Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah etc. and then boast about your inaction as being a strategic 'play' rather than a reality of your impotence or inability to effect anything
  • Fail to fund UK defence sufficiently such that your defence secretary resigns which ultimately leads to the death knell of your premiership
The idea that Keir Starmer is some foreign relation guru is frankly laughable... he constitently acquiesces to the most illogical, one-sided, ill-considered deals entirely on the weak basis of "international law" or "global justice" to appeal to his narrow, middle class Islington world view rather than for the benefit of the wider country.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 7
No..Boris was of course completely honourable and his contacts were of the utmost integrity. Don't forget he was much loved by the people of Ukraine too..

Sorry but I have to disagree with your verdict on Johnson.