This has turned into an off topic discussion for which I think there are other threads about. Sorry if that sounds like I’m trying to police this thread; I’m not. I know it’s nuanced and hard to separate Kneecap from this but still…
You’d be naive to think a piece of paper would ever take away injustice.Yeah, it goes deep. The separate schooling system, the political system of power sharing and mandatory coalition, leading to numerous Stormont collapses and petty political point scoring.
It’s hard to find balance, I try my best but it’s hard not to get riled. Especially when accused or republican victimhood…. But anyway.
Recently I had a conversation with a friend who happens to be a unionist, about dual language signage in Grand Central Station, they argued Irish language was only representative of republicanism and if dual language signs were going up then there absolutely needed to be a union flag.
My response was fire away, throw it up. I couldn’t give a duck about a flag, it doesn’t threaten me, I see union flags every day and get on with my life. That flag doesn’t represent me, I feel no affinity or loyalty to that it but can I look past it and get on with my day? Yes. It’s not difficult.
But could they accept that actually in one way or another they already speak the Irish language every single day through placenames and the language belongs to all (see Linda Ervine, Kyle Paisley and even the bleeping OO)
No, total unequivocal unacceptence and denial.
Because of ‘every word spoken is a bullet’ blah blah bleeping blah. A quote from what…40 years ago being used as a valid reason. And no current positive leadership on the matter from unionist politicians.
This is a really basic and what should be straightforward issue now Irish is a recognised language in NI and would bring us in line with the UK, but as usual, ‘themmuns’ want it so it’s a no from unionism.
This is one example- point scoring exists on both sides of course but duck it’s frustrating.
It’s people trying to get across why others feel as they do , my first thoughts when I saw the “ only good Tory is a dead one “ was in reference to Maggie Thatcher? Ding Dong the witch is dead is another favourite chant amongst Republicans, over her stance on the hunger strikers, they did bomb the Tory party conference in Brighton.This has turned into an off topic discussion for which I think there are other threads about. Sorry if that sounds like I’m trying to police this thread; I’m not. I know it’s nuanced and hard to separate Kneecap from this but still…
But this is the hate crimeIt makes me so sad to see so many stories about sectarianism in NI recently, for example this weekend https://www.thejournal.ie/three-boys-attacked-in-derry-sectarian-violence-6689954-Apr2025/
I remember post GFA, Omagh etc thinking that it was all mostly resolved and people were coexisting happily despite everything that had happened, save a few die hards and then seeing the Holy Cross school girls being tormented when I wasn't long out of primary school myself led me to realise it went a lot deeper than I could imagine and the troubles would never be over for some people.
Injustice…or….republican victimhoodYou’d be naive to think a piece of paper would ever take away injustice.
Hes acting like we're all sound with what Netanyahu is up to.
They’re claiming “ bad actors “ are to blame? I’d like to see the full context of what they were referring too.Hes acting like we're all sound with what Netanyahu is up to.
Personally I wouldn't support Netanyahu being allowed to play Glastonbury.
You don't get to say "kill your local MP" and then try to claim you have the higher moral ground. As far as I know Jo Cox's husband doesn't have a pro-Israel agenda to prevent them from speaking about Gaza, hes said how damaging what they said was and called out their non apology.
They've wrecked what they claim they were trying to achieve which was bringing attention to the genocide in Gaza by claiming support of terrorist groups and calling for violence.
You’re missing the point. You can’t make a comparison with Netanyahu, who is actively responsible for the murder of thousands of people and Kneecap who have…said words.Hes acting like we're all sound with what Netanyahu is up to.
Personally I wouldn't support Netanyahu being allowed to play Glastonbury.
You don't get to say "kill your local MP" and then try to claim you have the higher moral ground. As far as I know Jo Cox's husband doesn't have a pro-Israel agenda to prevent them from speaking about Gaza, hes said how damaging what they said was and called out their non apology.
They've wrecked what they claim they were trying to achieve which was bringing attention to the genocide in Gaza by claiming support of terrorist groups and calling for violence.
They claimed "kill your local MP " was taken out of context but I don't know what context that would be ok and they didn't explain in what context they meant it that would be okWhat was non apologetic about their apologythey can’t really win can they?
They claimed "kill your local MP " was taken out of context but I don't know what context that would be ok and they didn't explain in what context they meant it that would be ok
From their "apology"
"We also reject any suggestion that we would seek to incite violence against any MP or individual. Ever. An extract of footage, deliberately taken out of all context, is now being exploited and weaponised, as if it were a call to action. This distortion is not only absurd - it is a transparent effort to derail the real conversation. "
Eminem’s music (for one example) is full of references to violence, grape, guns, knives, murder etc. If we were to take every word an artist says literally then there would be nobody left to cancel.![]()
As explained earlier the context was performance. It’s hyperbole. Pomp. Banter. Peacocking. Slabbering. Carrying on.
Call it whatever you want, but you know very well they weren’t actively encouraging or compelling anyone to commit murder ffs.
You’re either pearl clutching or incredibly naive.
Have you ever told a friend you’ll kill them in the context of having a few drinks, having the craic and doing a bit of slabbering
If so- get yourself down to the police station cos you’re nothing but a criminal.
I’m not saying their comments are big, clever, particularly funny or wise, but I recognise that they mean sweet duck all.
I’m yet to see one person who was at the gig in question say they genuinely took the comments as an incitement to murder an MP.
I mean did anyone take that tweet about burning down a refugee hostel as as compelling someone to commit murder? She still got 31 months for a tweet that was deleted fairly shortly afterwards. I have yet to see a single person who saw her tweet and decided to go out and commit arson or murder![]()
As explained earlier the context was performance. It’s hyperbole. Pomp. Banter. Peacocking. Slabbering. Carrying on.
Call it whatever you want, but you know very well they weren’t actively encouraging or compelling anyone to commit murder ffs.
You’re either pearl clutching or incredibly naive.
Have you ever told a friend you’ll kill them in the context of having a few drinks, having the craic and doing a bit of slabbering
If so- get yourself down to the police station cos you’re nothing but a criminal.
I’m not saying their comments are big, clever, particularly funny or wise, but I recognise that they mean sweet duck all.
I’m yet to see one person who was at the gig in question say they genuinely took the comments as an incitement to murder an MP.
I genuinely don’t know the details of what happened so I won’t comment with any conviction but at a quick glance I don’t necessarily agree with that either.I mean did anyone take that tweet about burning down a refugee hostel as as compelling someone to commit murder? She still got 31 months for a tweet that was deleted fairly shortly afterwards. I have yet to see a single person who saw her tweet and decided to go out and commit arson or murder
I'm not saying that incitment to hate laws are proportionate but the idea that they're being targeted unfairly is laughable when people with smaller audiences have faced stiff penalties for saying similar.
Well they are saying there is extra context to it. Given that they have been chanting about Thatcher being dead and no one bats an eye (as someone else mentioned), I suspect that context may be relevantFrom their "apology"
"We also reject any suggestion that we would seek to incite violence against any MP or individual. Ever. An extract of footage, deliberately taken out of all context, is now being exploited and weaponised, as if it were a call to action. This distortion is not only absurd - it is a transparent effort to derail the real conversation. "
Given the airtime their manager has had this past week, he's done nothing but deflect to the situation in Gaza. I don't think many people would dispute that the situation there is awful, but it doesn't answer the question about killing MP's, does it?I suspect that context may be relevant