Judge said didn’t she? worst driving she’d ever seen,but was fucked from previous judge On case.Regarding skanks motoring offences,,
Skank is a REPEAT OFFENDER and should be jailed.
NO LICENCE.
NO INSURANCE.
DRIVING WHILST DISQUALIFIED.
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE.
FAILING TO NAME THE DRIVER.
ACCIDENT.
SPEEDING.
NO SEATBELT.
USING A MOBILE.
Each of the above skanks been in court for or been done under the single justice act on more than one occasion for each offence. That is a REPEAT OFFENDER and according to the law should have had a custodial sentence.
She wouldn't have needed to be going that fast either. She was drugged and pissed up and it was an unlit road.There were photos of the car on its side. I reckon she hit the verge (probably going too fast just after the bend on a wet road) and it flipped, rolled and then ended up on its side.
View attachment 2937614
That's the thing with skank it's not just 1 or 2 or even a mistake it's blatantly giving the finger to the law, the courts and the judges that skanks been done for each offence 2 or 3 times.
Mind blowing isn't it? No wonder people keep coming up with theories that she is being protected etc. This truly isThat's the thing with skank it's not just 1 or 2 or even a mistake it's blatantly giving the finger to the law, the courts and the judges that skanks been done for each offence 2 or 3 times.
But,but who was the fucker that saved her?strangeShe wouldn't have needed to be going that fast either. She was drugged and pissed up and it was an unlit road.
Huffington Post seems to have the most relevant article...So it was a load of make up shite? But why though,the Bloke that found her disappeared,What was the ‘idea’ of why? Drugs she admitted that but what was the ‘Why’
The fact she was drunk and drugged up was the reason she wasn't injured ... she was unable to tense upLets just say to roll a car at high speed with nothing to stop it, the car would roll several times due to the speed before it finally came to a stop. If you lose control of a car at high speed it does not just fall over on it side it spins and maybe travels for maybe 50 or more metres before it come to a rest. Its also highly unlikely it would do that in a straight line. Plus the reactions of a drunk, drugged up driver would be so slow they would never be able to control anything.
That was at sentencing Dolly,, the loophole lawyer from the previous hearing had already pulled the rehab card on the previous judge, so when skank went for sentencing the new judges hands were tied.Judge said didn’t she? worst driving she’d ever seen,but was fucked from previous judge On case.
You mean this crash?There were pictures in the media of the car on its roof from what I remember
6am is an all-night bender. She should have had the book thrown at her.Huffington Post seems to have the most relevant article...
For friend, read drug dealer...
He added: “As I understand it she had been drinking, she was lonely and she decided to go and see a friend who lived a relatively short distance away and that is when the incident happened.”
Katie Price Told Police She'd Taken Drugs Before Car Crash, Court Hears
The reality TV star allegedly told police officers: "I took drugs, I should not be driving, I admit it all."www.huffingtonpost.co.uk
Plus the fact that she is a narcissist cunt meaning that she doesn't get stressed as normal peeps would.The fact she was drunk and drugged up was the reason she wasn't injured ... she was unable to tense up
By the time her body even reacted to "Something happening", it was over. Very slow reaction times when you are that far off your head.The fact she was drunk and drugged up was the reason she wasn't injured ... she was unable to tense up
She fucking got off fucking ban again..just goes on And on.cunt.6am is an all-night bender. She should have had the book thrown at her.
That was another story that changed 3 times for dramatic effect,,,,But,but who was the fucker that saved her?strange
So dear Stan whatya fink?That was another story that changed 3 times for dramatic effect,,,,
1st. It was a bloke that heard the loud bang and came out his house to Fing skank.
2nd, it was a bloke that was driving to work that found skank sat by the crashed car on the side of the road.
3rd, for skanks C4 documentary, it was the young hero who decided on that morning to drive a different way home from work, found the upturned car with skank inside pleading for help, kicked in the window and heroically lifted skank in his arms and sat nursing her until the ambulance arrived.
That was another story that changed 3 times for dramatic effect,,,,
1st. It was a bloke that heard the loud bang and came out his house to Fing skank.
2nd, it was a bloke that was driving to work that found skank sat by the crashed car on the side of the road.
3rd, for skanks C4 documentary, it was the young hero who decided on that morning to drive a different way home from work, found the upturned car with skank inside pleading for help, kicked in the window and heroically lifted skank in his arms and sat nursing her until the ambulance arrived.
There are sentencing guidelines that have to be adhered to though. They go off the level of alcohol in the blood, not how long someone's been drinking. If she'd caused an accident with another vehicle or injured someone it would have been much worse. This isn't protection, it's just how the law is.6am is an all-night bender. She should have had the book thrown at her.
She admitted to drug taking. There are tests for that too!There are sentencing guidelines that have to be adhered to though. They go off the level of alcohol in the blood, not how long someone's been drinking. If she'd caused an accident with another vehicle or injured someone it would have been much worse. This isn't protection, it's just how the law is.
Drugged up yes, but she'd run out of the marching powder so there's the need for speed!She wouldn't have needed to be going that fast either. She was drugged and pissed up and it was an unlit road.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?