I'm just bringing
@WillowTree21 's post over, I've been catching up, busy doing an actual job not squeezing my mangled bazookas into what looks like a babybel cheese case.
''I've been talking to someone in 'the know'. I don't know whether she's thick, being advised badly, lying or something fishy. Could be a mixture of them all. She appears to have 150-200K to hand over (to keep the house) & then come to an arrangement with Trustee's. Say's money from her OF's earnings (Can't believe that either) ! She's confident (take that as arrogant/cocky), everything is ok for next Thursday. Well, I don't know much about bankruptcy, but I don't believe SHE can dictate how any money she hands over is used, (if she hands over a large amount of cash, ) & that will suspend the mortgage company from going for repossession.
Then sod all to any other creditors. Tax office I believe would be out to get some cash from her immediately. She's asked for the BH to be private, no press or open court. Can she do that? I had to cut the call short, as had a reminder on phone had dentist appointment, which I forget about - nursing home looming''
I knew she would be arrogant and cocky, I think she does expect things to disappear, she always thinks she should just be allowed to carry on, however she wants. It's huge narcy entitlement and magical thinking.
I thought that trying to pay creditors in an order that benefits you was illegal. Boris Becker got done for that. It's supposed to be the trustee who decides what's paid and when. With her having a voluntary agreement last time, I'm not sure she's at the stage where this could be illegal