Re: Hair Burst & Home Bargain
I think with both companies (initially) acknowledging that they are aware of the “indiscretions” of a collaborator, a partner to their businesses, yet continuing to work with her, says to me that:
1. This is just an action to fulfil contractual obligations. Both Hair Burst & Home Bargains must be legally bound here? I can’t imagine any reputable business wanting to associate with a racist, homophobic, bully. Which brings me to the next point:
2. Both Hair Burst and Home Bargains must not have a decent contract in place? One which outlines the termination of contract, in instances where you bring the business into disrepute, where you lie?
They both need a decent legal team, or have someone draw up a decent enforceable contract.
Ultimately she has lied and has been deceitful in trying to “cover her tracks” - which has then implicated others (Kristine) of accusing genuine complainants of lying.
She lied about her racist, homophobic, bullying behaviour and actions, which is ultimately a breakdown in mutual trust and reason enough to terminate a contract.
The fact is she, and those who associate themselves with her, who condone her behaviour, and support her, are morally void and equally horrible people. Read the wiki.