The crime scene was speaking to us brought to you by both Paul and Yuriy, man oh man, if only police work was so easy, lol!
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Really? Jail for what? The offence of....?
How many text messages is not relevant it's the content of them. Your point is what? If she said she hit him once it doesn't count? There might be a confession but it was only a few messages so we can ignore it?
Oh right this is the same argument as Karen uses 'I know i said I hit him but i only said it once.'
Has anyone heard the updates on the Brian Walshe case, man accused of dismembering his wife? They're now looking to get some important evidence (Google searches about body disposal etc) thrown out as it was collected illegally. Guess who the investigating officer was? Bloody Proctor 
I saw that yeah, another mess by the same cops.Has anyone heard the updates on the Brian Walshe case, man accused of dismembering his wife? They're now looking to get some important evidence (Google searches about body disposal etc) thrown out as it was collected illegally. Guess who the investigating officer was? Bloody Proctor
Fanning writing reports 2 years late and backdating them, no chain of custody of evidence again, seizing electronics without warrants.
A lot of the same cops are also linked to the Sandra Birchmore case too. Morrissey still hasn’t charged Matthew Farwell and allegedly made comments at the Quincy caucus that he “believes the medical examiner’s opinion of suicide will be upheld”.
The FBI affidavit on the charges is grim reading.
.....and this is why I don't believe you are a lawyer.....
And this is why none of the cult can answer a simple question.
I am a lawyer. Your belief about what I am means nothing to me. You believe in dog bites and contractors....at least my job is real.
Name the offence please that would result in jail time. Or do you lot just make stuff up?
I like to rely on facts, the law and actual evidence not stuff people just make up off the top of their heads and present as fact.
So tell me which law you are referring to.
Last edited:
Consequences of Unauthorized Disclosure: Leaking privileged communications can have serious legal and ethical repercussions:
- Criminal charges:
Depending on the nature of the leak and applicable laws, the person leaking the information could face criminal charges such as unauthorized access to protected information or obstruction of justice.
- Civil lawsuits:
Clients whose communications have been leaked can sue for damages, including emotional distress, reputational harm, and financial losses.
- Disciplinary actions:
Lawyers who violate attorney-client privilege can face disciplinary actions from their state bar, potentially leading to suspension or disbarment.
.......(we know the lawyer in the Read case did not leak the alleged texts
- Waiver of privilege:
If privileged information is leaked, the attorney-client privilege may be deemed waived, meaning the information can be used against the client in legal proceedings.
.......it's all contained in the Fourth Amendment..... 
You said jail time. Still waiting for you to say what the offence is. What you've said is
*Depending on the nature of the leak and applicable laws"
So what is the applicable law that gives he person jail time please?
Which statute?
Give me chapter and verse on your "jail time" comment.
I'm not interested in the civil consequences or having attorney client privilege explained. You said Jail time.
I'm not listing ALL federal and state laws - however, police have been jailed in the USA for leaking confidential communications between a client and attorney. The criminal charges come under 'obstruction of justice'; 'official misconduct' or 'conspiracy'. For example, in Massachusetts, obstruction of Justice can lead to significant penalties, including probation, through to several years in a state prison (up to 20 years)
Obstruction of justice applies if there's a trial going on. Trial is over.
"Conspiracy" isn't an offence. I thought you did A level law
Also might not be police leaking them.
Forgot to add, it comes under tampering with evidence....and is punishable by one year and one day in federal prison
Yes, conspiracy is a criminal offense in the USA, both at the federal and state levels. It typically involves an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime, along with an overt act by at least one of them to further the agreementObstruction of justice applies if there's a trial going on. Trial is over.
"Conspiracy" isn't an offence. I thought you did A level law
I did A level law....which started with the very boring bills and statutes for the first year.....followed by County Court laws and By-Laws. We briefly touched on criminal law in the second year.......We didn't study American laws....
Conspiracy to commit a particular named offence. 'conspiracy' isn't a crime of itself.
It has to be conspiracy to commit a particular crime. And leaking an email wouldn't be a conspiracy to commit anything unless at least two people were involved.
Perhaps you didn't cover incohate offences in your A level.
It's not evidence. The trial is over.
Carry on throwing nonsense out though and presenting it as statements of facts about US law.
I don't know whether it is a criminal offence that would lead to jail time. That's why I am asking which law would result in jail time for leaking an email. I'm not the one who stated it would but you seem to know all about even though you learned about local bylaws and county courts for your A level....
Anyway ignoring the jail time the leaker would definitely get (according to our US legal expert) - would people believe she did it if her emails to Yanetti were leaked and reveal that she did actually hit John? Or would they find another excuse why she's innocent? A lot of the FKR people still believe Brian Kohberger is innocent. Deluded.
A conspiracy IS an offence - it doesn't need to end in the committing of a crime........I'm wondering where you got your degree?????Obstruction of justice applies if there's a trial going on. Trial is over.
"Conspiracy" isn't an offence. I thought you did A level law
Also might not be police leaking them.
It has to be a conspiracy to commit a crime. It doesn't exist in the abstract. It doesn't need to end in the commission of a crime but it has to be a conspiracy to commit an actual offence.
But hey I've only been a qualified solicitor for 21 years I bow to your A level law knowledge of byelaws and county courts