Omg really?? What type of meals?Until recently I could feed myself for a week on that... but then again I don't buy food out or takeaways
Omg really?? What type of meals?Until recently I could feed myself for a week on that... but then again I don't buy food out or takeaways
Yummy!!! EnjoyI rushed through a couple of chores, food & drinks at the ready, today I got some buttered toffee popcorn!
![]()
It may work as a casual reference.There is almost certainly a very good reason he didn't mention the knife earlier. I don't believe for a second it was an oversight. Choosing to bring it up in closing means there can't be any testimony about it.
That’s what I’m doingWatch them. I’m sure it will be posted here when the verdict is in.![]()
Hmmm, is that good or bad?That DUI guy has just tweeted that apparently the jury haven’t asked one question yet…
I was joking as a lot of us are impatient!Jury have currently been deliberating for 12 hours
It says plaintiffs motion is granted in the documentationDepps team asked for a motion in strike in one comment from ambers teams closing statement where it was said “ their decision would send a message to DV victims everywhere” as inappropriate as it’s a larger social issue. Judge denied as case had already gone to jury.
Maybe keep one of the legal channels up on a tablet?Sisters do I risk watching the soaps? I've missed them the last few weeks, or do I keep law & crime on? I don't know what to do![]()
I‘m not sure what you mean. Both sides are making it “strictly about the op-ed”. They have been given three sentences - one a headline, and the other two part of the text - from the piece and have to decide whether they are defamatory.Not to de rail but I think jury trials are so important. The issue of being judged by your peers to me is paramount. Also because you can bring in your own life experiences into play. I think it's when some very questionable verdicts happen that people question them. Eg OJ
I should have made myself more clear you are right. The 1st Amendment does not give anyone the right to lie with impunity. However defamation, going by the very strict letter of the law is difficult to prove. Rottenborn's technique is to make it strictly about the OP Ed in the Washington Times. If he can keep it that very strict parameter then I believe Amber Heard wins.
Just my opinion. Despite vowing now to watch the trial as you can see I am not fully engrossed in it. Lol.
My cousin is 200hrs into it and loves itI'm just watching an Elden Ring stream - looks like a cool game, but I have serious GFX card envy.
No, we don'tDo we have a rough idea when the verdict might be?
I don’t know it seems like it. When it happen she should have stopped. I would think when out was happening.Is she still on Heard's side? I used to like her before this trial.
So I noticed Team Turd asked for them to award Virginia max of $350k in closing arguments that would be over and above any jury decided award?Extra compensatory damages meant to deter/ punish the wrong doer
What happened? XI really want to have a mega pint but Ive already passed out in TK Maxx today...dont think I could deal with another episode![]()